Economy
Pakistan’s trading partners
There have been questions raised on the extent to which foreign policy of Pakistan should reflect its trading relationships with individual countries, regions, and groups of countries which are members of international organizations? This requires determination of which are the major destinations of the country’s exports, and which are the major origins of our imports? What is the regional and country-wise pattern of our trade surpluses and deficits? And which are the major countries to which our exports have shown faster growth?
The analysis has been undertaken with trade data made available by the SBP in its economic data website. For earlier years, the relevant information has been obtained from the SBP publication, Handbook of Statistics on Pakistan Economy.
The top four export markets of Pakistan in 2020-21 are the EU countries combined, the USA, UK, and China. It is significant that the major destinations of Pakistan’s exports are mostly in Europe and North America. Pakistan has been granted GSP plus status by the European Union with some preferential tariff treatment. Pakistan also has a free trade agreement with China which has been implemented in steps from 2006 onwards.
The combined exports to the 27 EU countries aggregated to $6.4 billion in 2020-21. This represents a share of 25 percent of Pakistan’s total exports. The second largest value of exports is to the USA of $5.0 billion, equivalent to 20 percent of total exports of Pakistan.
The other two relatively large destinations of the country’s exports are the UK and China. Combined, the share of Pakistan’s four major export markets is over 62 percent of total global exports. This highlights the extreme regional concentration of the country’s exports. The share of SAARC countries is only 8 percent, despite presence of the SAFTA free trade agreement. It was somewhat higher when there was trade directly with India.
Turning to the regional distribution of the country’s imports, the sources are more diversified. China is by far the dominant exporter to Pakistan. Imports from China aggregated to $13.2 billion in 2020-21, equivalent to over 25 percent of total imports. The other major exporting countries to Pakistan include the OPEC countries with a share of 24 percent, followed by the EU countries and the USA. Overall, the combined share of these countries is close to 55 percent in total imports of Pakistan.
What has been the growth rate of exports to the major destinations? Between 2012-13 and 2018-19, the fastest cumulative increase over the six years is to the UK of 33 percent, followed by a 32 percent increase to Germany and of 11 percent to the USA. The big declines are to China of 27 percent, to Afghanistan of 37 percent and to the UAE of as much as 57 percent.
By far the largest increase in imports has been from China, which has taken full advantage of the free trade agreement with Pakistan. Between 2012-13 and 2018-19, the cumulative increase has been as much as 133 percent. Now China alone accounts for 30 percent of total imports of Pakistan.
The overall trade deficit of Pakistan was very large in 2020-21 at $26.5 billion, with imports over twice the level of exports. Therefore, the likelihood is high that Pakistan will carry a significant deficit with most of its major trading partners. The country-wise balance of trade is given in the table below.
========================================================================
Table 1
========================================================================
Pakistan's Trade Balance with Major Trading Partners, 2020-21
($ billion)
========================================================================
Exports to Imports from Balance of Trade
========================================================================
China 2.0 13.2 -11.2
USA 5.0 2.4 3.6
EU Countries 6.5 3.7 2.8
Major OPEC Countries 1.9 9.4 -7.5
Others 10.2 28.7 -18.5
========================================================================
Total 25.6 52.1 -26.5
========================================================================
Pakistan has a very large trade deficit with China, equivalent to 42 percent of its global deficit. The deficit has been growing rapidly. Pakistan’s exports to China have been declining while imports have shown fast growth. Today, China’s exports to Pakistan are six times its imports from Pakistan. The time has come for a review of the implementation of the 2006 Trade Agreement between Pakistan and China. Pakistan needs to seek more quid pro quo from China.
The trade surplus with two major trading partners – the USA and the EU countries – is of $3.6 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. These are the bigger markets, especially for textile products. The trading relationship with these countries needs to be preserved and built upon.
Pakistan has preferential access to the EU market through the GSP plus programme since 2014. This allows a large share of Pakistan’s exports to enter EU countries free of duty. Two criteria must be met for continuation of this facility. First, GSP-covered imports should be less than 2 percent of EU’s imports from all GSP beneficiaries. The share currently of Pakistan is 1.6 percent. Second, the seven largest GSP covered products must account for at least 75 percent of Pakistan’s total GSP covered exports to the EU. The share currently of these products is 94 percent.
Further, Pakistan has had to ratify 27 core international conventions and subscribe to binding commitments to implement them effectively. These are mainly UN and ILO conventions and other conventions on environment. The GSP status of Pakistan is periodically reviewed by the EU. Weak areas of implementation by Pakistan relate to gender inequality, workers’ rights, and the presence of child workers.
There has been some focus recently on Pakistan’s trading relationship with Russia. The current volume of trade between the two countries is small with $163 million of exports and $593 million of imports. The imports are largely of wheat. Now with the international trade sanctions on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, new sources of wheat will have to be found when the quantity required could rise to almost 5 million tons given the failure of the current wheat crop.
Via BR
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Pennsylvania’s Economy at a Crossroads: Why Local Signals from WNEP Matter Nationally
Our Editorial Chief and senior columnist’s opinion on how regional shifts in PA reflect the broader U.S. economy.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The U.S. economy is often measured in sweeping national statistics—GDP growth, inflation rates, and interest‑rate decisions. Yet the real pulse of America’s financial health beats in its local communities. Pennsylvania, with its diverse industries and working‑class backbone, offers a telling microcosm of national trends. And through outlets like WNEP, local anxieties and aspirations are broadcast daily, shaping how residents—and by extension, the nation—interpret the state of the economy.
Macro Context: The National Economy Meets Local Reality
At the national level, policymakers are grappling with inflationary pressures, uneven job growth, and questions about consumer confidence. Wall Street analysts debate whether the U.S. economy is heading for a soft landing or a prolonged slowdown. But in Pennsylvania (PA), these abstract debates translate into tangible realities: factory shifts, small business closures, and household budgets stretched thin.
Pennsylvania’s economy has long been a bellwether. Its manufacturing hubs, energy corridors, and healthcare networks mirror the broader U.S. industrial mix. When the state’s job market tightens or consumer spending dips, it often foreshadows national patterns.
“Local economies are the real pulse of national health. Ignoring signals from places like Pennsylvania risks misreading the bigger picture.”
Regional Insights: WNEP and the Pennsylvania Lens
Local news outlets like WNEP play a critical role in contextualising these shifts. Coverage of rising grocery prices, layoffs in regional plants, or new infrastructure projects provides a ground‑level view of the economy that national headlines often miss.
- Manufacturing: Once the backbone of PA’s economy, it now faces global competition and automation challenges.
- Healthcare: A growing sector, yet burdened by staffing shortages and rising costs.
- Logistics & Energy: Pennsylvania’s geographic position makes it a hub for distribution and energy production, sectors that are sensitive to national policy shifts.
By reporting on these industries, WNEP not only informs residents but also contributes to the national narrative.
Business & Consumer Implications
For small businesses in PA, the economy is not an abstract concept—it’s survival. Rising interest rates make borrowing harder, while inflation erodes margins. Consumers, meanwhile, adjust by cutting discretionary spending, delaying home purchases, or seeking additional income streams.
This dynamic reflects a broader truth: the health of the U.S. economy is inextricably linked to the resilience of its local communities. Pennsylvania’s struggles and successes are America’s struggles and successes.
Opinion: The Columnist’s Perspective
As a senior columnist, I argue that local economies are the real pulse of national health. Wall Street optimism often overlooks Main Street realities. Ignoring signals from places like Pennsylvania risks misreading the bigger picture.
Consider this: while national GDP may show growth, if households in Scranton or Harrisburg are tightening belts, the sustainability of that growth is questionable. WNEP’s coverage of local hardships—job losses, rising costs, community resilience—offers insights that policymakers and investors cannot afford to ignore.
The contrarian view here is simple: the economy’s future may be written in Pennsylvania.
Conclusion
Pennsylvania’s economy is not just regional—it is predictive. From manufacturing floors to local newsrooms, the signals emanating from PA offer a window into America’s trajectory. Policymakers, investors, and readers alike must pay attention to these local cues.
As WNEP continues to spotlight the lived realities of Pennsylvanians, the rest of the nation would do well to listen.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Biography
The Steel and Silk: Why Sanae Takaichi is the LDP’s Only True Challenger to the Status Quo
The election of Sanae Takaichi as Japan’s first female prime minister is often framed as a symbolic gender breakthrough. That is a distraction. The real story isn’t her gender; it is her unapologetic, hardline conservative ideology that marks her as the single greatest threat to the LDP’s decades-long pattern of cautious, incremental change. As a protégé of the late Shinzo Abe, Takaichi is not merely maintaining his legacy; she is positioned to accelerate it, using a political momentum that few outside the core conservative base truly appreciate.
Her rise signals a defiant pivot toward a deeply nationalistic, robustly defended, and economically secure Japan—a vision that, if fully executed, would fundamentally reshape domestic policy and regional diplomacy.
Table of Contents
The “Three Pillars” of Takaichi’s Policy: Assertion, Security, and Pragmatism
Unlike her more moderate predecessors, Sanae Takaichi operates from a platform built on three distinct, high-impact policy pillars that resonate powerfully with the party’s core conservative and nationalist wing.
1. The Revived “Sanae-nomics” and Economic Security
Takaichi is a staunch advocate for aggressive public spending and monetary easing, echoing Abe’s economic formula. But her unique addition is the heavy focus on economic security. Having served as the first Minister of Economic Security, she prioritises strengthening domestic supply chains (especially in semiconductors and critical minerals), protecting technology from foreign leakage, and establishing measures to counter techno-economic risks. This is not just about growth; it’s about national resilience. She sees government spending as a strategic tool for “crisis-management investment”, challenging the traditional conservative aversion to large debt.
2. Accelerated Defense and Constitutional Reform
The core of her political identity is an assertive defence posture. Sanae Takaichi has wasted no time in signaling an acceleration of plans to bring defence spending to 2% of GDP, far ahead of previous targets. This is paired with an intent to revise the three core security documents (National Security Strategy, etc.) and a desire to formally establish Japan’s Self-Defence Forces as a national military by revising the pacifist Article 9 of the Constitution. The departure of the restraining influence of the Komeito party from the coalition has cleared the path for a much more proactive foreign and security policy, aligning perfectly with the hawkish stance of the Japan Innovation Party (Ishin), her new coalition partner.
3. Cultural and Social Conservatism
On social matters, Takaichi maintains a firm traditionalist line. She has consistently opposed reforms such as allowing married couples to use separate surnames and is against same-sex marriage. She has also taken a hard-line stance on immigration, calling for tighter visa regulations and a crackdown on illegal migrants. While criticised by liberals, this position strongly appeals to conservative voters who felt abandoned by the LDP in recent elections, aligning with a global trend of cultural conservatism.
The Media Narrative vs. The Ground Truth
Internationally, Sanae Takaichi is often reduced to a simple caricature: a “China hawk” and a historical revisionist due to her regular visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine. While these facts are undeniable, they overshadow the ground truth of her political strength: she is the champion of the LDP’s rank-and-file general membership.
In the LDP leadership race, she consistently secured the most votes from party members around the country. This popularity is significant because it speaks to a deep yearning within the conservative base for a leader who is unreservedly patriotic and willing to push back against foreign and domestic pressures for change. Her victory wasn’t merely a factional deal; it was a powerful expression of the popular will within the conservative heart of the LDP. The party’s decision to rally behind her was, in part, a survival strategy to stem the flow of conservative voters to nascent right-wing parties like Sanseito.
What a “Takaichi Era” Means for Global Powers
The premiership of Sanae Takaichi immediately signals a new phase in Japan’s major diplomatic relationships, particularly with the United States.
Her ideology is arguably better aligned with a potential future US administration that favours nationalism and “America First” policies. Takaichi’s emphasis on a strong, independent Japanese military and her firm stance on economic security and China are seen as appealing to the more transactional, less interventionist wing of American politics. Her early overtures, including gestures of personal affinity and a commitment to strengthening critical mineral supply chains, underscore her pragmatic approach to maintaining the core Japan-US alliance while asserting Japan’s national interests.
However, her hardline approach on Taiwan—breaking with diplomatic tradition by stating a China attack on the island could result in a Japanese military response—has already drawn sharp rebukes from Beijing, leading to increased tensions in the East China Sea. Her tenure is set to redefine Japan’s role, shifting it from a quiet, pacifist partner to an assertive, autonomous actor on the world stage, prioritising national interest with a Margaret Thatcher-like fortitude.
Conclusion: The Defining Choice for Japan
Sanae Takaichi is not a figure who offers compromise. She offers conviction. Her success in leading a minority government will not be defined by legislative consensus but by her ability to generate public support for her bold, conservative vision. Her premiership will be a test of whether Japan’s public is truly ready to sacrifice post-war pacifist and economic norms for a newly assertive national identity.
Do you believe Sanae Takaichi is the future of the LDP, capable of navigating this complex political environment and securing a stable governing majority? Share your perspective on her policy direction.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Economy
📉 UK Economy Unexpectedly Contracted by 0.1% in September: A Canary in the Coal Mine?
The announcement that the UK economy unexpectedly contracted by 0.1% in September 2025 indicates more than just a minor statistical blip. It is a significant signal of underlying fragility within the nation’s economic landscape. While the overall third-quarter GDP growth of a modest 0.1% shielded the country from an immediate technical recession, the monthly September economic decline in the UK paints a much gloomier picture, raising serious questions about the sustainability of the recent, albeit sluggish, recovery.1 For finance and economics readers, this figure demands a deep dive beyond the headline.
Table of Contents
The Significance of the Contraction
A monthly contraction has occurred. This follows a revised flat August and an unadvised fall in July. These are clear signs that the UK economic growth 2025 trajectory is losing steam.2 This is particularly worrying as the UK had been one of the fastest-growing G7 economies earlier in the year.3
The significance lies in the momentum—or lack thereof. Liz McKeown, ONS Director of Economic Statistics, commented that growth slowed further in the third quarter of the year. Both services and construction were weaker than in the previous period.4 There is a fear that the economy is struggling to gain solid traction. This suggests that the recent modest expansion was built on shaky foundations. As we head into the traditionally busy end-of-year period, the nation is potentially vulnerable to further shocks.5
Analyzing the Causes Behind the Unexpected Decline
The primary culprit for the sharp monthly drop in September was unequivocally the production sector, which fell by a stark 2.0%.6 Within this, the manufacturing of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers experienced a monumental 28.6% decline.7
- The Cyber-Attack Shock: Experts attribute a substantial portion of this manufacturing collapse to the crippling cyber-attack on Jaguar Land Rover (JLR). This cyber-attack forced a prolonged shutdown of production lines.8 The ONS highlighted that this one event contributed a negative 9$0.17$ percentage point drag to the monthly GDP figure.10 This highlights a modern, non-traditional threat to economic stability.
- Wider Manufacturing Weakness: While the JLR incident was the most dramatic factor, the production sector weakness was broader.11 The ONS reported a fall in all production subsectors, indicating that broader global headwinds and subdued demand for manufactured products are also weighing heavily.12
- Consumer Caution and Uncertainty: While the services sector managed a slight 0.2% growth in September, overall consumer-facing services fell in the third quarter. High inflation (at 3.8% in September 2025) coupled with political and fiscal uncertainty ahead of the Chancellor’s Autumn Budget likely led to increased caution, with households opting to save more rather than spend.13 This is a crucial factor holding back a broad-based recovery.
Short-Term and Long-Term Impacts
The UK economy contraction in September will have immediate and lasting consequences for key economic players.
1. Businesses
Short-Term: Manufacturers, especially those in the automotive supply chain, face immediate revenue hits. They urgently need to bolster their digital resilience against cyber threats.14 Business confidence is likely to be fragile. Persistent rumours of potential tax hikes in the upcoming Budget could further complicate the situation. These rumours may stifle investment plans.15
Long-Term: The fall in business investment, down 0.3% in Q3, is a major concern. Without sustained private sector investment, the UK’s long-term productivity puzzle will remain unsolved. This puzzle is characterized by stubbornly low growth in output per hour. It will cap the potential for stronger, non-inflationary UK economic growth in 2025 and beyond.
2. Consumers
Short-Term: The simultaneous rise in the unemployment rate to 5% coupled with the weak growth figures confirms a softening labour market.17 This combination of anaemic growth and rising joblessness will undoubtedly dampen wage expectations and consumer confidence, leading to further saving rather than spending.
Long-Term: Stagnant growth and low productivity translate directly into a continuation of the living standards squeeze. This reinforces a trend of real GDP per head growth. The growth is far too weak to deliver meaningful improvements for the average household.
3. Government Policy
The weak data significantly increases the pressure on the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).18 Given the figures, and the narrow 5-4 vote to hold rates at 4.0% in November, expectations for a December rate cut have substantially increased. Markets are now pricing in a reduction to 19$3.75\%$. This is seen as a measure to stimulate activity.20
For the Chancellor, the figures pose a dilemma:
- Fiscal Tightening: To meet fiscal targets, the Chancellor is expected to announce a large package. This will involve fiscal tightening such as tax rises or spending cuts.21
- Growth Trade-Off: However, a significant fiscal contraction could “slam the brakes on the economy.” This makes the already difficult goal of achieving sustainable growth even harder. The UK financial outlook is precarious, and any policy misstep could easily tip the economy into a recession.
Conclusion and Call to Action
The 0.1% UK economy contraction in September is a stark reminder that the journey to robust economic health is far from over. Stripping away the single-event shock of the cyber-attack, the underlying picture remains one of a sluggish economy struggling with low productivity, cautious consumer spending, and the chilling effect of policy uncertainty.
The immediate focus must be on bolstering business confidence—not undermining it with unexpected tax burdens—and strategically targeting investment that addresses long-term structural issues. The upcoming Budget must be a pivotal moment, offering a clear and consistent long-term plan rather than short-sighted measures designed merely to balance the books. The UK financial outlook hinges on whether policymakers view this data as a temporary blip or a critical warning sign that requires a fundamental change in growth strategy.
Will the government seize this moment to outline a bold vision for the future, or will we continue to drift into an era of low growth and rising uncertainty? The answer will define the rest of UK economic growth 2025 and well beyond.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News4 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China5 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada5 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict5 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy4 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Democracy4 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital5 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
