News
TPNW can prevent nuclear disaster in South Asia
The second Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons began at the United Nations Headquarters on 27 November and will continue until 1 December 2023. Ambassador (Dr.) Juan Ramón de la Fuente (Mexico) was elected as President of the Meeting.
António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations calls the Treaty “an important step towards the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons and a strong demonstration of support for multilateral approaches to nuclear disarmament.”

Ambassador Melissa Parke of Australia and the Executive Director of ‘International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons’ (ICAN) warned the world body during the high-level opening statement that “Nuclear-armed states, instead of pursuing disarmament following their legal obligations, are squandering tens of billions of dollars every year to ‘improve’ and expand their arsenals. A theft from the world’s poor. An insult to all who value peace…Some of these same states are also waging wars of aggression – with staggering death tolls and undeniable nuclear risks…Against this backdrop of bloodshed, we must renew our call not only for nuclear disarmament, but also, more broadly, for multilateral approaches to peace and security, and for adherence to the international rule of law, based on the UN Charter.”
“It is worth mentioning here that ICAN was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 for the leadership role it played in achieving Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.“
Arundhati Roy, an Indian novelist and activist was representing the aspirations of hundreds of millions of people all over the world when she wrote in “Cost of Living” that “It is such a supreme folly to believe that nuclear weapons are deadly only if they’re used. The fact that they exist at all, their presence in our lives, will wreak more havoc than we can begin to fathom. Nuclear weapons pervade our thinking. Control our behaviour. Administer our societies. Inform our dreams. They bury themselves like meat hooks deep in the base of our brains. They are purveyors of madness. They are the ultimate colonizer. Whiter than any white man that ever lived. The very heart of whiteness.”
I completely agree with Ms. Roy for her foresight about the danger of the existence of nuclear weapons. Perhaps not by coincidence, the danger of nuclear threat in South Asia should be of paramount interest to the world body. Kashmir is the bone of contention in the nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan. It has been regarded by President Bill Clinton as the most dangerous place on earth. Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, Helen Clark said, “Kashmir is a nuclear flashpoint.” Kashmir is the only nation in the world which is surrounded by three nuclear powers – India, Pakistan & China. Perhaps that was the reason that former President Obama said on November 10, 2010, in New Delhi, “The resolution of Kashmir is in the interest of India, Pakistan and the region and the United States.”
Kashmir currently has more than 900,000 military and paramilitary troops occupying the Valley with no more than 10 million people, a ratio of one soldier for every 10 citizens. However, because of their concentration in the towns and cities, the density is more like 5 to one. Imagine what that would be like on your city block.
Having so many troops in this small country whose size is no greater in square miles than the U.S. state of Tennessee should certainly be a cause for concern by anyone. Why are Indian forces there? Where’s the war? Is neighbouring Pakistan about to invade? Is China? Do they have a similar number of troops amassing at the border? This is more than three times the number of troops the U.S. had at the height of the Iraq War. The answer is None of the Above. It’s a curious fact that we have a very circular problem inherent in a deep paranoia India has long had of an uprising and its use of such troops to maintain control and put down any threat has become a way of life. It’s like avoiding a fire by burning down the house first.
The possibility of such an uprising is greatly enhanced and exacerbated by the presence of these troops and would more likely be a direct provocation for such an uprising and has been. Rather than relieve the pressure in the cooker by taking it off the fire, India’s solution has been to simply turn up the burner. The greatest cause of discontent is this constant abrasive to the social conscience, this erosion of trust in New Delhi, and a pervasive atmosphere of fear. People look for leadership elsewhere in their ranks, and they have. There is a deeply entrenched movement at the grassroots level that has become very influential in being the voice of public opinion.
It is a historical fact that when the Kashmir dispute erupted in 1947-1948, the United States championed the stand that the future status of Kashmir must be ascertained following the wishes and aspirations of the people of the territory. The United States was the principal sponsor of resolution # 47 which was adopted by the Security Council on 21 April 1948 and based on that unchallenged principle. Following the resolution, the United States, a leading member of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP), adhered to that stand. The basic formula for settlement was incorporated in the resolutions of that Commission adopted on 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949.
But India would not then and will not now honour that commitment or admit that its claim to Kashmir is illegitimate. And it will not admit to the world that the people of Kashmir have no faith in Indian democracy. Perhaps India believes that if it keeps repeating the same lie over and over again, that Kashmir is an integral part of India, things will settle down if a few carrots are offered, and the problem will go away.
Who knows it better than India that the cry for azadi (Freedom) in Kashmir has simply gotten louder? As such the level of tensions between India and Kashmir and between India and Pakistan show few signs of letting up any time soon. And ignoring the decades-old problem of refusing to resolve the question of Kashmiri sovereignty and self-determination has not only led to deep unrest among the Kashmiris; it has also led to two wars between India and Pakistan. That they are now both nuclear-armed states raises the stakes dramatically and calls for action to defuse these tensions immediately.
Perhaps it’s time the major powers take this seriously. The answer is plain as day for anyone. Kashmir has international legitimacy. It has international sanctity. It commits the United Nations Security Council. These commitments should once and for all be honoured. The clock is ticking. Every day that passes without a resolution of the Kashmir dispute is one day closer to a cataclysm that will reach far beyond the borders of all countries involved.
Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai is also Secretary General World Kashmir Awareness Forum.
Analysis
The 2026 Medicare Sticker Shock: Why Your COLA Raise Is Already Gone
The Social Security Administration delivered the news retirees desperately wanted to hear: a 2.8% 2026 Social Security COLA increase, designed to shield fixed incomes from persistent inflation. For the average retiree, that translates to roughly a $56 per month increase.
Sounds good, right? Don’t deposit that phantom raise just yet.
As a senior healthcare policy analyst, I can tell you that the accompanying announcement from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the silent thief in the night. The sharp increase in Medicare 2026 premiums is poised to claw back nearly one-third of the entire COLA, leaving millions of seniors with little more than a nominal net increase—and, for some, no increase at all.
The illusion of a raise is quickly yielding to the reality of the healthcare squeeze.
Table of Contents
The Brutal Math: How the Premium Hike Neutralizes the COLA
The key numbers that matter most to retirees on Original Medicare are staggering.
- Old Standard Part B Premium (2025): $185.00
- New Standard Medicare Part B premium 2026: $202.90
- The Difference: An increase of $17.90 per month.
Since the Part B premium is automatically deducted from your Social Security check, this is an immediate, inescapable reduction to your net income.
| Calculation | Monthly Increase | Impact |
| Gross COLA Increase (Avg.) | ~$56.00 | The headline raise. |
| Less: Part B Premium Hike | -$17.90 | The mandatory deduction. |
| Net Gain (Avg.) | ~$38.10 | What’s left for food, gas, and utilities. |
That $17.90 hike consumes approximately 32% of the average retiree’s raise, bringing the effective COLA down from 2.8% to around 2.1%. After a year of intense inflation hitting food, fuel, and housing, this marginal net gain offers almost no genuine retiree inflation protection. It is the largest erosion of the COLA by Medicare premiums since 2017.
The Hidden Costs You Must Also Face
Beyond the standard premium, two other numbers underscore the rising financial pressure:
- Medicare Part B deductible increase: This is rising from $257 to $283. This is the amount you must pay out-of-pocket annually before Part B coverage kicks in.
- Part A Inpatient Deductible: This is also rising to over $1,736 per benefit period. A single, unexpected hospitalization could now cost hundreds of dollars more than it did in 2025.
For those with smaller Social Security checks, the “hold harmless” provision will thankfully prevent your net benefit from decreasing. However, it also means your check essentially won’t grow at all, leaving you with zero net benefit from the COLA to battle rising consumer prices.
📈 The Wealth Penalty: IRMAA Brackets 2026
The squeeze is exponentially tighter for affluent and upper-middle-class retirees who are subject to the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA). This surcharge requires higher earners to pay a larger percentage of the Part B program cost.
The initial IRMAA trigger is now based on your 2024 tax filing.
- IRMAA Trigger 2026 (Single Filers): Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) > $109,000
- IRMAA Trigger 2026 (Joint Filers): MAGI > $218,000
The problem? Many retirees are only slightly above these thresholds, often due to a single, planned event like selling an appreciated asset or executing a small Roth conversion. Falling into that first IRMAA bracket can jump your total Part B monthly premium from $202.90 to $284.10 (and higher tiers escalate steeply from there), completely vaporizing the 2.8% COLA and potentially reducing your actual net monthly income.
Actionable Advice: Three Moves to Protect Your Income Now
The reality of these high Medicare deductible 2026 and premium costs demands a proactive financial stance. Here are three strategies to mitigate the damage:
1. Optimize Your Taxable Income (The IRMAA Strategy)
If you are close to an IRMAA threshold, work immediately with your tax advisor to manage your 2026 IRMAA brackets exposure.
- Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): If you are 70.5 or older, use QCDs from your IRA to satisfy your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD). This lowers your MAGI without generating taxable income.
- Roth Conversions: Strategically time any Roth conversions to stay under the IRMAA limit. A large conversion this year could cost you thousands in surcharges two years from now.
2. Review Your Part D and Medicare Advantage Options
Since this is Open Enrollment Season, don’t default to your old plan.
- Part D Surcharges: IRMAA also applies to Part D prescription drug coverage. Review your Part D plan’s premium and its coverage of your specific medications.
- Medicare Advantage: While not for everyone, many MA plans offer $0 Part B premiums and incorporate Part D coverage, offering a way to avoid the direct Part B premium hike—though you must weigh network restrictions and out-of-pocket limits.
3. File an IRMAA Appeal (The SSA-44)
Did a life-changing event (e.g., stopping work, reduction in work hours, divorce, death of a spouse) significantly reduce your income since 2024? If so, you can file a Form SSA-44 with Social Security to appeal the IRMAA determination based on your current reduced income, potentially lowering your premium tier immediately.
The 2.8% COLA was supposed to be a lifeline against inflation. For millions of American seniors, it will instead be a transfer payment to cover soaring healthcare costs. Planning now is the only way to ensure the net number on your Social Security check is maximized.
Analysis
The Odd Couple: Why the Trump-Mamdani “Bromance” is the Most Honest Thing in Politics Right Now
Let’s be honest: if you had “Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani bonding over utility bills” on your 2025 Bingo card, you’re lying.
But yesterday, the simulation didn’t just glitch; it completely reset.
On Friday, the Oval Office played host to a scene that would make a cable news pundit’s head explode. On one side, President Donald Trump, the avatar of right-wing populism. On the other hand, Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani, a card-carrying Democratic Socialist who campaigned on taxing the rich. By all laws of political physics, this should have been a cage match. It should have been fire and fury.
Instead? It was a bromance.
The Mamdani and Trump meeting wasn’t just cordial; it was arguably the most fascinating political theatre of the year. Watching them sit side-by-side, you didn’t see a clash of civilizations. You saw two guys from Queens who know exactly how to work a room, and who both seemingly hate the exact same people.
Table of Contents
The “Fascist” Pass
The moment that’s going to burn down social media isn’t the policy talk—it’s the joke.
When a reporter from the press pool—voice trembling with the anticipation of a “gotcha” moment—asked Mamdani if he still considered the President a “fascist,” the air left the room. It’s the kind of question designed to blow up a meeting.
But before Mamdani could answer, Trump interrupted. He didn’t rage. He didn’t tweet. He leaned over, patted the Mayor-Elect’s arm like a proud uncle, and dropped the line of the year:
“That’s okay. You can just say yes. It’s easier than explaining it. I don’t mind.”
This is the latest evolution of Trumpism. It’s a level of post-irony that renders the usual resistance attacks useless. By giving Mamdani a permission slip to use the “F-word” (fascism), Trump didn’t just defuse the insult; he owned it. He turned the ultimate condemnation into an inside joke between two guys who understand that labels don’t matter as much as leverage.
For Mamdani, it was a masterclass in pragmatism. He didn’t walk back his beliefs, but he didn’t take the bait. He laughed. And in that laugh, the “Resistance” died a little, and something else—something far more pragmatic—was born.
The Common Enemy: Con Edison
So, what do a billionaire real estate mogul and a socialist tenant organizer talk about when the cameras are off?
Con Edison.
If there is one thing that unites the penthouse and the tenement, it is the absolute hatred of a utility bill that makes no sense. This was the glue of the Trump Zohran summit.
Trump, ever the simplifier, argued that since global fuel prices are down, the rates in New York City must drop. “It’s ridiculous,” he said. Mamdani, who has made public power a central pillar of his platform, nodded vigorously. “Absolutely,” he replied.
This is the common ground that the establishment ignores at its peril. The Con Edison discussion highlights the “Horseshoe Theory” in action—the idea that the far-left and the far-right eventually curve around and meet. Both Trump and Mamdani appeal to voters who feel ripped off by faceless corporations and abandoned by the centrist status quo.
When Mamdani pointed out that “1 in 10” of his voters also pulled the lever for Trump, he wasn’t apologizing; he was stating a fact that Democratic consultants in D.C. are too terrified to admit. The working class doesn’t care about the ideological labels; they care that their lights stay on without bankrupting them.
Queens Recognizes Queens
Perhaps the most surreal moment came when Trump defended Mamdani against his own party. Rep. Elise Stefanik had previously thrown the kitchen sink at Mamdani, labeling him a “Jihadist.”
In a normal timeline, Trump joins the pile-on. But yesterday? He dismissed his loyalist’s attack with a wave of his hand, calling Mamdani a “rational person” and adding, “The better he does, the happier I am.”
Why? Because Stefanik is Washington. Trump and Mamdani are New York. Specifically, they are creatures of the outer boroughs.
There is a specific frequency that New Yorkers operate on—a mix of hustle, bluntness, and a complete lack of patience for decorum. The Zohran Mamdani White House meeting proved that geography is often thicker than ideology. Trump looks at Mamdani and doesn’t see a socialist threat; he sees a guy who won against the odds, a guy who knows how to fight, and a guy who isn’t boring.
The New Face of Populism?
We are witnessing a realignment. The Trump-Mamdani meeting headline isn’t just a fluke; it’s a preview.
We have entered an era where cultural warring takes a backseat to the raw exercise of power against perceived elites. Suppose the new face of populism involves a MAGA president and a socialist mayor teaming up to bully a utility company into lowering rates. In that case, the centrist middle is in big trouble.
The traffic swarm on social media will obsess over the “fascism” joke. Still, the real story is boring, practical, and terrifying for the establishment: Trump and Mamdani agree on more than you think.
And as Trump said, he doesn’t mind if you call him names, as long as you can cut a deal. Welcome to the new New York.
Opinion
The Texans Defense Just Put the AFC on Notice—With or Without Stroud
Josh Allen didn’t just lose a football game on Thursday night; he survived a mugging.
If you watched the Texans vs Bills highlights, you didn’t see a shootout. You saw a statement. You saw a Houston defensive front that smelled blood in the water and a secondary that refused to break. By the time the clock hit zero at NRG Stadium, with the scoreboard reading Texans 23, Bills 19, one thing became violently clear: The Houston Texans are no longer just “C.J. Stroud’s team.”
They are a defensive juggernaut capable of wrecking the AFC playoff picture, regardless of who is under center.
Table of Contents
The “Bullock Breakout” and the Pass Rush Party
Let’s start with the metric that matters most: 8 sacks.
That is not a typo. The Texans’ defensive front, led by the relentless Will Anderson Jr. (who tallied 2.5 sacks and seemingly lived in the Bills’ backfield), turned one of the league’s best quarterbacks into a frantic escape artist. Anderson has now recorded a sack in six straight games, tying a franchise record held by Mario Williams. He isn’t just rushing the passer; he is wrecking game plans.
But the true story of Thursday night was rookie safety Calen Bullock.
- 3 Total Turnovers Forced: Two interceptions and a forced fumble.
- The “Closer”: His interception with 24 seconds left didn’t just pad the stats; it iced the game.
In a league obsessed with offense, DeMeco Ryans has built a unit that wins ugly. When the Bills threatened late, it wasn’t the offense that responded—it was the defense forcing a 4th-and-27 disaster for Buffalo. This is the brand of football that travels well in January.
Davis Mills Did “Just Enough” (And That’s the Point)
Let’s address the elephant in the room: C.J. Stroud was out.
When your franchise quarterback is sidelined with a concussion, the playbook usually shrinks to the size of a napkin. Enter Davis Mills. The backup signal-caller didn’t light up the box score (153 yards, 2 TDs), but he did something far more important: he didn’t lose the game.
- Zero Turnovers: Mills protected the football.
- Red Zone Efficiency: Two first-half touchdown passes gave the defense a lead they could defend.
The “Mills Narrative” isn’t about him being a saviour. It’s about the Texans proving they have the infrastructure to survive adversity. Good teams panic when their star goes down. Great teams lean on their other units. Thursday night proved that Houston is becoming the latter.
The AFC South & Playoff Picture
So, where does this leave the Texans?
At 6-5, they are back above .500 and have firmly re-inserted themselves into the NFL playoff picture AFC. This wasn’t just a win; it was a tiebreaker goldmine against a fellow AFC contender.
With the Jaguars and Colts also fighting for the AFC South crown, this win stabilises the ship. If Stroud returns healthy for the stretch run—paired with this version of the defence—Houston is a dark horse to make a deep run. They just proved they can beat a 7-win Bills team without their best player. Imagine what they can do when he returns.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When will C.J. Stroud return?
C.J. Stroud is currently in the NFL concussion protocol. While there is no official timeline, most players typically miss one week. If he clears protocol, he could return for the Week 13 matchup against the Jaguars.
Are the Texans playoff contenders?
Absolutely. At 6-5 with a tiebreaker win over Buffalo, the Texans are firmly in the Wild Card hunt and still competing for the AFC South title. Their defence (ranking top-5 in sacks) makes them a dangerous matchup for any team.
Who is Calen Bullock?
Calen Bullock is the Texans’ rookie safety out of USC. He was a third-round draft pick in 2024 and has quickly become a playmaker, recording multiple interceptions in his debut season, including the game-sealer against the Bills.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News4 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China4 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada4 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict4 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy4 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Democracy4 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital5 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
