Connect with us

Opinion

US Veto of UAE-led UN Resolution: Implications for Gaza War and Alleged US Support for Brutal Mass Genocide by Israel in Gaza

Published

on

The United States has vetoed a United Nations resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza, which was led by the United Arab Emirates. The resolution called for an immediate cessation of hostilities in Gaza and for the protection of civilians. However, the US argued that the resolution was one-sided and did not address the root causes of the conflict.

This move by the US has raised questions about its stance on the Gaza war and its support for Israel. Many are questioning whether the US is supporting Israel in its alleged mass genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. The veto has also been criticized by other countries, including France and the UK, who have called for an end to the violence in Gaza.

The implications of the US veto are far-reaching and could have a significant impact on the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The question remains whether the US will continue to support Israel in its actions in Gaza or take a more neutral stance in the conflict. The world is watching closely as the situation in Gaza continues to escalate, and the need for a peaceful resolution becomes more urgent.

Background of the US Veto on UAE-Led UN Resolution

On December 08, 2023, the United States vetoed a UN Security Council resolution, which was led by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and demanded an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. The resolution was introduced after weeks of escalating violence in the region, which resulted in numerous civilian deaths and widespread destruction.

The US veto was met with widespread criticism from many countries, including the UAE, which had drafted the resolution. The UAE’s ambassador to the UN, Lana Nusseibeh, expressed disappointment and frustration at the US’s decision, stating that the resolution was a “critical step towards ending the violence and protecting civilians.”

The US’s decision to veto the resolution was largely seen as a show of support for Israel, which had been accused of committing mass genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The US has long been a staunch ally of Israel and has provided the country with significant military and financial support over the years.

The veto also sparked renewed calls for the reform of the UN Security Council, which has been criticized for its inability to effectively address conflicts and crises around the world. Many countries have called for an expansion of the Security Council to include more countries and greater representation from the developing world.

The veto also sparked renewed calls for the reform of the UN Security Council, which has been criticized for its inability to effectively address conflicts and crises around the world. Many countries have called for an expansion of the Security Council to include more countries and greater representation from the developing world.

Overall, the US’s veto of the UAE-led UN resolution has raised important questions about the role of the US in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the effectiveness of the UN Security Council in addressing global crises.

ALSO READ :  China’s Support for Palestine: A Comprehensive Look at the Israel-Gaza War

Implications for the Gaza Conflict

Shift in US Foreign Policy

The US veto on the UAE-led UN resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire has significant implications for the ongoing conflict. The veto indicates a shift in US foreign policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the US appearing to support Israel’s military actions in Gaza.

This shift in policy is likely to have a profound impact on the peace process and the prospects for a resolution to the conflict. The US has traditionally played a key role in brokering peace talks between Israel and Palestine, and its support for Israel is likely to further polarize the two sides.

Impact on Gaza’s Humanitarian Situation

The US veto is also likely to have a significant impact on the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The ongoing conflict has already resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with thousands of civilians killed or injured and many more displaced from their homes.

The US veto is likely to further exacerbate this crisis, as it will make it more difficult for humanitarian aid to reach those in need. The international community has been calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza to allow for the delivery of aid and the evacuation of civilians, but the US veto makes this less likely.

Overall, the implications of the US veto on the UAE-led UN resolution are significant for the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The shift in US foreign policy towards Israel and the impact on the humanitarian situation are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the region.

Broader Geopolitical Consequences

US-Israel Relations

The US veto on the UAE-led UN resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire has significant implications for the US-Israel relations. The US has always been a strong ally of Israel, and its veto on the resolution further solidifies this relationship. However, this move has also raised concerns among other countries in the region, who view the US as supporting Israel’s aggression against Palestine. This could lead to increased tensions between the US and other Middle Eastern countries, which could have negative consequences for the US’s interests in the region.

ALSO READ :  Indian Diplomat summoned to register Pakistan’s strong protest against Ceasefire Violations by India

International Response and Criticism

The US’s veto has been met with widespread criticism from the international community. Many countries have condemned the US’s move, with some calling it a blatant disregard for human rights and a violation of international law. This criticism could further damage the US’s reputation on the global stage, particularly in the eyes of countries that have been affected by the conflict. Additionally, the US’s veto could lead to increased anti-American sentiment in the region, which could have negative consequences for the US’s interests and security in the long run.

Overall, the US’s veto on the UAE-led UN resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire has significant geopolitical consequences. It has further solidified the US-Israel relationship but has also raised concerns and criticism from other countries in the region and the international community.

Analysis of the “Mass Genocide” Accusation

Legal Definitions and Interpretations

The term “genocide” was first defined by the United Nations in 1948 in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. According to this convention, genocide is defined as any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group:

  • Killing members of the group
  • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
  • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
  • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
  • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

Based on this definition, the accusation of “mass genocide” implies that Israel is intentionally committing acts with the intent to destroy the Palestinian people as a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

International Law and War Crimes

Under international law, the intentional targeting of civilians or non-combatants is considered a war crime. The Geneva Conventions prohibit the killing, torture, and ill-treatment of prisoners of war, civilians, and other non-combatants. Additionally, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines war crimes as serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during armed conflict.

Conclusion

The accusation of “mass genocide” suggests that Israel is committing war crimes by intentionally targeting civilians and non-combatants in Gaza. However, it should be noted that determining whether an act constitutes a war crime or genocide requires a thorough investigation and legal analysis of the specific circumstances and intent behind the act.

In conclusion, the accusation of “mass genocide” is a serious allegation that requires careful consideration and investigation. While international law provides a framework for defining and prosecuting acts of genocide and war crimes, it is ultimately up to the international community to hold accountable those responsible for such acts.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Analysis

Brown University Shooting Sparks Renewed Manhunt After Suspect Released

Published

on

Providence, R.I. — The tranquil campus of Brown University was shattered this weekend by a deadly shooting that left two students dead and nine others wounded during final exams. As the community reels from the violence, authorities have reset their manhunt after releasing a previously detained person of interest, citing new evidence that “points in a different direction”.

The shooting occurred Saturday afternoon inside the Barus & Holley engineering building, a hub of student activity and academic rigor. Witnesses described chaos erupting as gunfire rang out during a packed exam session. One student, still visibly shaken, told reporters, “We were just trying to finish our semester. Then everything changed in seconds.”

A Campus in Mourning

Brown University President Christina Paxson issued a statement calling the attack “an unspeakable tragedy,” and announced that classes and exams would be suspended for the week. Vigils have sprung up across campus, with students lighting candles and leaving handwritten notes outside the building where the shooting occurred.

“This is not just a university story,” said Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKee. “This is a story about young lives cut short, families devastated, and a community that deserves answers”.

The Search Intensifies

On Monday, Providence Police released new surveillance footage showing a masked individual dressed in black walking near the scene shortly before the attack. The FBI has joined the investigation, offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the suspect, described as a male approximately 5’8″ with a stocky build.

ALSO READ :  Corporate Accountability: Unmasking the Post Office Scandal and Demanding Change

“This individual definitely targeted Brown University,” said Chief Colonel Oscar L. Perez, Jr. at a press conference. “We are exploring all possible motives, but this was not random”.

The suspect remains at large, and the search has expanded beyond Providence into neighboring states. Federal agents have been deployed to canvass neighborhoods, analyze digital evidence, and follow up on community tips.

A Community Demands Justice

The release of the initial detainee has sparked frustration among students and families, many of whom are demanding transparency and swift justice. “We want to see the individual that pulled the trigger on these young kids apprehended, identified and brought to justice,” said Governor McKee.

Brown University has set up emergency counseling services and a dedicated hotline for students and staff affected by the tragedy. Meanwhile, the broader academic community is grappling with the implications of violence in spaces meant for learning and growth.

What Comes Next

As the investigation unfolds, questions linger: Was this an isolated act or part of a broader threat? What security lapses allowed the gunman to enter a campus building undetected? And how will Brown—and universities nationwide—respond to the growing specter of campus violence?

For now, Providence remains on edge. Helicopters circle overhead, police checkpoints dot the city, and a once-quiet Ivy League campus finds itself at the center of a national reckoning.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Biography

Tributes Pour In for Rob Reiner, 78, as Hollywood Mourns a Storyteller Who Shaped an Era

Published

on

The death of filmmaker Rob Reiner at age 78 has prompted an outpouring of tributes across the entertainment world, as colleagues, actors, and cultural figures reflect on the legacy of a director whose work helped define modern American cinema. Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, were found dead in their Los Angeles home, according to police statements released this week.

Reiner’s passing—under circumstances now the subject of an active homicide investigation—has sent shockwaves through Hollywood and beyond. Authorities confirmed that the couple’s son, Nick Reiner, has been taken into custody and “booked for murder,” though charges have not yet been formally filed. The Los Angeles Police Department has said the case remains open as detectives continue their inquiry.

A Career That Spanned Generations

Rob Reiner’s influence on American storytelling is difficult to overstate. From the comedic brilliance of This Is Spinal Tap to the emotional resonance of Stand By Me, When Harry Met Sally, and A Few Good Men, Reiner’s films became cultural touchstones—quoted, revisited, and taught in film schools for decades.

His work blended humor with humanity, often exploring the fragile, complicated bonds between people. Reiner’s films were rarely just entertainment; they were emotional experiences that lingered.

Colleagues described him as a director with an uncanny ability to draw out vulnerability from actors while maintaining a light, collaborative set. “Rob had a way of making you feel safe enough to take risks,” one longtime collaborator said in a tribute posted shortly after news of his death broke.

ALSO READ :  FOREIGN MINISTER RECEIVES TELEPHONE CALL FROM GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER

A Loss Felt Across Hollywood

As news spread, tributes began flooding social platforms and industry circles. Actors who grew up watching his films shared memories of the first time they encountered The Princess Bride or Misery. Directors spoke of Reiner’s craftsmanship—his ability to move seamlessly between genres without losing his signature warmth.

Industry veterans noted that Reiner’s career bridged eras: from the golden age of network television, where he first gained fame on All in the Family, to the rise of prestige filmmaking in the 1980s and 1990s, and finally to the streaming era, where his classics found new audiences.

His death, many said, marks the end of a particular Hollywood lineage—one rooted in character-driven storytelling, emotional honesty, and a belief that films could be both deeply personal and universally resonant.

A Family Tragedy Under Public Scrutiny

The circumstances surrounding Reiner’s death have added a layer of heartbreak to the tributes. Police confirmed that both Reiner and his wife were found dead in their Brentwood home, and that their son Nick was arrested shortly thereafter. The case has drawn intense media attention, with officials urging the public to allow investigators space to complete their work.

Despite the grim backdrop, those who knew Reiner have focused their public statements on his life rather than the tragedy. “Rob Reiner changed the way America tells stories,” one filmmaker wrote. “His films helped us understand ourselves.”

A Legacy That Will Endure

Reiner’s influence will continue to ripple through Hollywood for generations. His films remain staples of American culture—quoted at weddings, referenced in political debates, and rediscovered by new audiences every year.

ALSO READ :  Cowboys VS 49ers: A Clash of Titans in the NFL

For many, the loss feels personal. Reiner’s work was woven into the fabric of everyday life: the comfort of a familiar line, the catharsis of a well-crafted scene, the joy of a story told with sincerity.

As Hollywood mourns, one truth is clear: Rob Reiner didn’t just make movies. He made memories.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Corruption

Transparency International Pakistan releases NCPS 2025

Published

on

ISLAMABAD—Transparency International Pakistan (TIP) on Tuesday released its comprehensive National Corruption Perception Survey (NCPS) 2025, presenting a mixed picture of public sentiment on corruption, anti-graft efforts, and governance across the country.

The survey, conducted with 4,000 respondents from all four provinces, reveals that while a significant majority of citizens did not report paying a bribe in the last year, three key public sectors—the Police, Tender/Procurement, and the Judiciary—continue to be perceived as the most corruption-prone institutions.

Police Top List Despite Perception Improvement

According to the NCPS 2025 findings, the Police remains the most corrupt sector in the eyes of the public, cited by 24% of respondents nationwide. This is followed by the Tender and Procurement process at 16%, and the Judiciary at 14%.

However, the report highlighted a subtle but “notable” positive shift in public perception regarding the Police, registering a 6% improvement in perceived behaviour and service delivery compared to the previous survey.

Low Bribery Rate vs. High Dissatisfaction

The survey’s most encouraging statistic is that a majority of citizens (66%) reported they did not feel compelled to pay a bribe for public services in the past 12 months, which TIP considers a strong indicator of perceived progress in service delivery. Provincially, Sindh reported the highest rate of citizens encountering a demand for a bribe at 46%.

Despite the low rate of personal bribery, public satisfaction with the government’s overall efforts to combat corruption remains low. A significant 77% of respondents nationwide expressed “low satisfaction” or were “not satisfied” with the government’s anti-corruption drive.

ALSO READ :  The New Great Game: US Retreat vs. China Peace Diplomacy 🕊️

The public identified the three major causes driving corruption as a lack of accountability (15%), lack of transparency and limited access to information (15%), and delays in the disposal of corruption cases (14%).

Demand for Accountability of Anti-Graft Bodies

The survey findings reflect a strong public demand for institutional reform and accountability. An overwhelming 78% of Pakistanis believe that anti-corruption institutions like the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) should themselves be more accountable and transparent.

Citizens also proposed a blueprint for curbing corruption, prioritising:

  • Enhancing accountability (26%)
  • Limiting discretionary powers (23%)
  • Strengthening Right to Information laws (20%)

The report also found a notable lack of awareness regarding reporting channels, with 70% of citizens being unaware of any official corruption reporting mechanism. Furthermore, 42% stated they would feel safe reporting corruption only if strong whistleblower protection laws were in place.

Economic Stability and Political Finance

On economic matters, approximately 58% of respondents indicated that the government has either fully or partially stabilised the economy, crediting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme and the country’s exit from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List. However, 57% reported a decline in their purchasing power over the past year.

The survey also highlighted a strong public desire for clean electoral financing, with a combined 83% of respondents supporting either a complete ban or strict regulation of business funding to political parties.

In response to the report, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed the survey, stating that the large number of respondents who reported not encountering corruption during his government reflects the public’s recognition of the reforms aimed at transparency and economic recovery.

ALSO READ :  Regime change?

For more details on the survey’s public opinion findings, watch this report: Transparency International Report on Corruption – Public Opinion – 9 Dec 2025.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2019-2025 ,The Monitor . All Rights Reserved .

Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading