Opinion
The Peril of National Conservatism: A Call to Action for Liberals
Table of Contents
Introduction
National conservatism is a political ideology that has been gaining momentum globally. It is characterized by a combination of right-wing policies and nationalist rhetoric. While some argue that national conservatism is a legitimate political movement, others believe it poses a growing peril to liberal democracy.

Historically, national conservatism has been associated with authoritarianism and fascism. In recent years, however, it has taken on a more mainstream form, with politicians such as Donald Trump in the United States and Viktor Orbán in Hungary espousing national conservative policies. This shift has led to concerns among liberal thinkers that national conservatism poses a threat to democratic values such as freedom of speech, the rule of law, and minority rights.
Key Takeaways
- National conservatism is a political ideology that combines right-wing policies with nationalist rhetoric.
- Historically associated with authoritarianism and fascism, national conservatism has become more mainstream in recent years.
- Liberal democracies face a growing peril from national conservatism, which poses a threat to democratic values such as freedom of speech, the rule of law, and minority rights.
Historical Context of National Conservatism

Defining National Conservatism
National conservatism is a political ideology that emphasizes preserving traditional values and national identity. It is characterized by a strong sense of patriotism and a belief in the importance of maintaining a strong national identity. National conservatives often advocate for policies that prioritize the interests of their own country over those of other nations.
Evolution from Traditional Conservatism
National conservatism has its roots in traditional conservatism, which emphasizes the importance of preserving traditional values and institutions. However, while traditional conservatism is generally focused on preserving existing social hierarchies and institutions, national conservatism places a greater emphasis on national identity and the preservation of cultural traditions.
The rise of national conservatism can be traced back to the early 20th century when nationalist movements began to gain traction in Europe. These movements were often characterized by a belief in the importance of preserving national identity and traditions and were opposed to the forces of globalization and internationalism.
In recent years, national conservatism has become increasingly popular in many parts of the world, including the United States and Europe. Some have argued that this rise in national conservatism is a response to the perceived threats posed by globalization and immigration, as well as a reaction to the perceived decline of traditional values and institutions.
Overall, the historical context of national conservatism is deeply intertwined with the rise of nationalist movements and the changing political and social landscape of the 20th and 21st centuries.
The Rise of National Conservatism Globally

National conservatism is a political ideology that emphasizes the preservation of national identity, culture, and tradition. It is a reaction to globalization and the perceived threat it poses to national sovereignty. National conservatism has been on the rise globally, particularly in Europe and the United States.
Case Studies of National Conservatism
In Europe, national conservatism has gained traction in countries like Hungary and Poland. These countries have seen a rise in far-right political parties that espouse nationalistic and anti-immigrant rhetoric. In Hungary, the ruling Fidesz party has implemented policies that restrict the rights of refugees and migrants. The party has also cracked down on the media and civil society, leading to concerns about the erosion of democracy in the country.
In the United States, the election of Donald Trump in 2016 marked a shift towards national conservatism. Trump’s “America First” agenda emphasized protectionism, nationalism, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Trump’s rhetoric and policies have been criticized for promoting xenophobia and undermining democratic norms.
Impact on International Relations
The rise of national conservatism has had a significant impact on international relations. Nationalistic policies have led to increased tensions between countries and a decline in global cooperation. For example, the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement and the Iran nuclear deal has been criticized for undermining global efforts to address climate change and prevent nuclear proliferation.
National conservatism has also led to a rise in populism and authoritarianism. Populist leaders often use nationalistic rhetoric to appeal to voters and consolidate power. This has led to concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the rise of authoritarianism in countries like Hungary, Poland, and Turkey.
In conclusion, the rise of national conservatism is a growing peril that threatens to undermine democracy and international cooperation. Liberals need to find a way to counter this trend and promote policies that emphasize inclusivity, diversity, and global cooperation.
Liberal Responses to National Conservatism

Strategies for Countering National Conservatism
There are several strategies that liberals can use to counter national conservatism. One strategy is to promote diversity and inclusion. National conservatism often promotes a narrow view of national identity that excludes many people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. By promoting diversity and inclusion, liberals can show that a nation can be strong and united while still respecting the rights and dignity of all its citizens.
Another strategy is to emphasize the importance of international cooperation. National conservatism often promotes a vision of a world in which nations compete with each other for power and resources. By emphasizing the importance of international cooperation, liberals can show that nations can work together to solve global problems such as climate change, poverty, and disease.
Challenges for Liberal Ideologies
However, countering national conservatism is not without its challenges. One challenge is that national conservatism often appeals to people’s emotions and identity, rather than their rational self-interest. National conservatives often use rhetoric that appeals to people’s sense of pride, patriotism, and belonging. This can be difficult to counter with rational arguments and evidence.
Another challenge is that national conservatism often taps into legitimate concerns that people have about the economy, immigration, and security. Liberals need to acknowledge these concerns and offer solutions that address them in a way that is consistent with liberal values such as human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.
In conclusion, countering national conservatism requires a multifaceted approach that includes promoting diversity and inclusion, emphasizing international cooperation, acknowledging people’s concerns, and offering solutions that are consistent with liberal values. By doing so, liberals can help prevent the spread of national conservatism and promote a more just, peaceful, and prosperous world.
Future Implications

Potential Scenarios for Political Climate
The rise of national conservatism could lead to several potential scenarios in the political climate. If this trend continues, it could lead to an increase in authoritarianism, nationalism, and xenophobia. This could result in a decrease in civil liberties, human rights abuses, and a rise in political violence.
On the other hand, if liberals are successful in countering this trend, it could lead to a more open and inclusive society. This would require a concerted effort to promote progressive values, such as equality, diversity, and democracy. It would also require a willingness to engage with those who hold different views, to build bridges and find common ground.
Role of Media and Education
The media and education will play a crucial role in shaping the future of national conservatism. The media has a responsibility to report on this trend accurately and objectively, to inform the public and to promote democratic values. This will require a commitment to fact-checking, transparency, and accountability.
Education will also be key in countering national conservatism. This will require a focus on critical thinking, media literacy, and civic education. Students should be taught to question authority, challenge assumptions, and engage in constructive dialogue. This will help to build a more informed and engaged citizenry, capable of defending democratic values and resisting authoritarianism.
Overall, the future implications of national conservatism are uncertain. However, this trend poses a significant threat to democratic values and civil liberties. It will require a concerted effort by liberals, the media, and educators to counter this trend and build a more open and inclusive society.
Frequently Asked Questions

How does national conservatism differ from traditional conservatism?
National conservatism is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of national identity, culture, and sovereignty. It is distinct from traditional conservatism in that it places a greater emphasis on the role of the state in promoting and protecting these values. National conservatives tend to be more skeptical of free trade, globalization, and immigration than traditional conservatives, and they often advocate for policies that prioritize the interests of their own country over those of others.
What are the potential risks associated with the rise of national conservatism?
One of the main risks associated with the rise of national conservatism is the potential for increased polarization and division within societies. National conservatism often pits “us” against “them,” and can lead to the demonization of minorities and other groups that are seen as threats to national identity. This can create a climate of fear and intolerance that can be harmful to democracy and social cohesion.
In what ways can liberal ideologies effectively counter the spread of national conservatism?
There are several ways in which liberal ideologies can effectively counter the spread of national conservatism. One approach is to emphasize the importance of diversity, inclusivity, and tolerance. This can help to promote a sense of unity and common purpose that transcends national boundaries. Another approach is to focus on economic policies that promote shared prosperity and reduce inequality, which can help to address some of the underlying grievances that fuel national conservatism.
What historical precedents exist for the current surge in national conservatism?
There are several historical precedents for the current surge in national conservatism, including the rise of fascism and authoritarianism in the early 20th century, and the emergence of nationalist movements in Europe and Asia in the post-World War II era. These movements often emerged in response to perceived threats to national identity and sovereignty, and were characterized by a rejection of liberal democracy and a preference for strong, centralized leadership.
How is national conservatism impacting international relations and global politics?
National conservatism is having a significant impact on international relations and global politics. It is contributing to a shift away from multilateralism and towards a more transactional approach to diplomacy, with countries prioritizing their own interests over those of the international community. This can lead to increased tensions and conflicts between nations, and may make it more difficult to address global challenges such as climate change and economic inequality.
What strategies are being implemented by national conservative movements to gain political influence?
National conservative movements are using a variety of strategies to gain political influence, including appealing to nationalist sentiment, promoting anti-immigrant and anti-globalization policies, and cultivating relationships with other right-wing movements around the world. They are also using social media and other digital platforms to spread their message and mobilize supporters, and are often adept at exploiting populist grievances to gain political power.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Corruption
Transparency International Pakistan releases NCPS 2025
ISLAMABAD—Transparency International Pakistan (TIP) on Tuesday released its comprehensive National Corruption Perception Survey (NCPS) 2025, presenting a mixed picture of public sentiment on corruption, anti-graft efforts, and governance across the country.
The survey, conducted with 4,000 respondents from all four provinces, reveals that while a significant majority of citizens did not report paying a bribe in the last year, three key public sectors—the Police, Tender/Procurement, and the Judiciary—continue to be perceived as the most corruption-prone institutions.
Table of Contents
Police Top List Despite Perception Improvement
According to the NCPS 2025 findings, the Police remains the most corrupt sector in the eyes of the public, cited by 24% of respondents nationwide. This is followed by the Tender and Procurement process at 16%, and the Judiciary at 14%.
However, the report highlighted a subtle but “notable” positive shift in public perception regarding the Police, registering a 6% improvement in perceived behaviour and service delivery compared to the previous survey.
Low Bribery Rate vs. High Dissatisfaction
The survey’s most encouraging statistic is that a majority of citizens (66%) reported they did not feel compelled to pay a bribe for public services in the past 12 months, which TIP considers a strong indicator of perceived progress in service delivery. Provincially, Sindh reported the highest rate of citizens encountering a demand for a bribe at 46%.
Despite the low rate of personal bribery, public satisfaction with the government’s overall efforts to combat corruption remains low. A significant 77% of respondents nationwide expressed “low satisfaction” or were “not satisfied” with the government’s anti-corruption drive.
The public identified the three major causes driving corruption as a lack of accountability (15%), lack of transparency and limited access to information (15%), and delays in the disposal of corruption cases (14%).
Demand for Accountability of Anti-Graft Bodies
The survey findings reflect a strong public demand for institutional reform and accountability. An overwhelming 78% of Pakistanis believe that anti-corruption institutions like the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) should themselves be more accountable and transparent.
Citizens also proposed a blueprint for curbing corruption, prioritising:
- Enhancing accountability (26%)
- Limiting discretionary powers (23%)
- Strengthening Right to Information laws (20%)
The report also found a notable lack of awareness regarding reporting channels, with 70% of citizens being unaware of any official corruption reporting mechanism. Furthermore, 42% stated they would feel safe reporting corruption only if strong whistleblower protection laws were in place.
Economic Stability and Political Finance
On economic matters, approximately 58% of respondents indicated that the government has either fully or partially stabilised the economy, crediting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme and the country’s exit from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List. However, 57% reported a decline in their purchasing power over the past year.
The survey also highlighted a strong public desire for clean electoral financing, with a combined 83% of respondents supporting either a complete ban or strict regulation of business funding to political parties.
In response to the report, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed the survey, stating that the large number of respondents who reported not encountering corruption during his government reflects the public’s recognition of the reforms aimed at transparency and economic recovery.
For more details on the survey’s public opinion findings, watch this report: Transparency International Report on Corruption – Public Opinion – 9 Dec 2025.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Breaking News
Japan Earthquake Today: Tsunami Warnings, Vigilance, and Resilience
As breaking news spread that a powerful 7.6-magnitude earthquake struck northeastern Japan today, triggering tsunami warnings and mass evacuations. Stay informed about the latest updates, safety measures, and historical context.
Japan earthquake today has once again reminded the world of the country’s vulnerability to seismic activity. Late on December 8, 2025, a 7.6 magnitude earthquake struck off the northeastern coast near Aomori, prompting widespread tsunami warnings and urgent evacuation orders.
Japan, located in the seismically active “Ring of Fire,” is no stranger to earthquakes and tsunamis. Yet each tremor brings renewed urgency, fear, and resilience. This article provides a step-by-step breakdown of the latest events, the science behind earthquake and tsunami warnings, and the human stories of vigilance and survival.
Table of Contents
The Earthquake in Japan Today
- Magnitude: 7.6 (USGS, JMA reports)
- Time: 11:15 p.m. local time, December 8, 2025
- Epicenter: ~80 km offshore Aomori Prefecture
- Depth: ~33–44 km below the surface
- Impact: Shaking rated “upper 6” on Japan’s 1–7 intensity scale — nearly impossible to stand without crawling.
Residents reported violent shaking, falling furniture, and broken windows. Several injuries were confirmed in Aomori, with at least 33 people hurt across northern Japan.
Tsunami Warning Japan Earthquake
The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) issued a tsunami warning immediately after the quake. Waves between 20–70 cm were observed at ports in Aomori and Hokkaido. Authorities warned of possible waves up to 3 meters (10 feet).
Although tsunami alerts were later lifted, officials urged continued vigilance due to aftershocks and the risk of a “megaquake”.
Human Impact and Evacuations
- Evacuations: ~90,000 residents ordered to leave coastal areas.
- Infrastructure: Train services were disrupted, power outages were reported, and fires broke out in Aomori.
- Nuclear Safety: Plants in northeastern Japan conducted urgent safety checks.
Families fled to higher ground, clutching emergency kits. Elderly residents were assisted by volunteers, while schools and community centers opened as shelters.
Historical Context: Earthquakes and Tsunamis in Japan
Japan has faced devastating quakes before:
- 2011 Tōhoku Earthquake & Tsunami: Magnitude 9.0, killed nearly 20,000 people.
- 1995 Kobe Earthquake: Magnitude 6.9, killed over 6,000.
These events shaped Japan’s disaster preparedness, from strict building codes to nationwide drills.
Science Behind Tsunami Warnings
Tsunamis occur when undersea quakes displace water. Japan’s advanced monitoring systems detect seismic waves and issue alerts within minutes. The tsunami warning Japan earthquake system is among the most sophisticated globally, saving countless lives.
Vigilance and Preparedness
Authorities emphasised vigilance:
- Keep emergency kits ready.
- Know evacuation routes.
- Follow official alerts, not rumours.
Preparedness is cultural in Japan — schools, offices, and households regularly practice drills.
Global Reactions
International leaders expressed solidarity. Aid organisations offered support, while neighbouring countries monitored for possible tsunami impacts.
Conclusion
The earthquake in Japan today is a stark reminder of nature’s power and the importance of vigilance. While tsunami warnings have been lifted, aftershocks remain a risk. Japan’s resilience, preparedness, and community spirit continue to inspire the world.
FAQs (SEO Boost Section)
Q1: Was there a tsunami in Japan today? Yes, small waves were observed, but major tsunami warnings have been lifted.
Q2: How strong was the earthquake in Japan today? It was a magnitude 7.6 quake, one of the strongest in recent years.
Q3: What should people do during a tsunami warning? Evacuate to higher ground immediately, stay tuned to official alerts, and avoid coastal areas.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Entertainment
How Netflix Stole Warner Bros from David Ellison: Old Hollywood’s Miscalculation
For two decades, Netflix has been dismissed as a disruptor that would eventually plateau. Legacy Hollywood believed its dominance was temporary, a fad that would fade once the old guard flexed its muscle. Yet in 2025, the streaming pioneer pulled off a coup that stunned the industry: Netflix outmanoeuvred David Ellison’s Skydance and secured Warner Bros, rewriting the rules of entertainment economics.
Table of Contents
Macro Context: Streaming’s Rise and Hollywood’s Decline
The streaming wars have reshaped the global media landscape. Netflix, once a DVD‑by‑mail service, now commands billions in revenue and a subscriber base that dwarfs traditional cable. Meanwhile, legacy studios like Warner Bros Discovery struggled under debt, fragmented audiences, and outdated business models.
David Ellison’s Skydance, backed by ambition and capital, seemed poised to rescue Warner Bros. Yet Netflix’s strategic patience, global reach, and ability to monetise content across platforms proved decisive.
David Ellison’s Bid: Ambition Meets Reality
Ellison’s attempt to acquire Warner Bros was emblematic of Hollywood’s old guard—ambitious, well‑funded, but ultimately constrained by legacy thinking. Skydance’s merger talks with Paramount highlighted Ellison’s vision of building a modern studio empire. But when it came to Warner Bros, Netflix’s agility and scale proved insurmountable.
- Skydance Strategy: Focused on blockbuster franchises and traditional studio models.
- Netflix Strategy: Leveraged global subscriber data, AI‑driven content recommendations, and diversified revenue streams.
- Outcome: Ellison underestimated Netflix’s ability to play the long game.
Warner Bros: A Legacy Studio Recast
Warner Bros, once synonymous with Hollywood glamour, became a symbol of industry decline. Debt burdens, misaligned leadership, and fragmented IP portfolios left it vulnerable. Netflix’s acquisition was not just a business deal—it was a cultural takeover.
By absorbing Warner Bros, Netflix gained access to iconic franchises, a century of cinematic heritage, and a foothold in theatrical distribution. More importantly, it signaled that streaming had officially eclipsed legacy Hollywood.
Opinion: Why Old Hollywood Misread Netflix
As a senior columnist, I argue that Hollywood underestimated Netflix’s long game. For years, executives dismissed streaming as secondary to theatrical releases. They failed to grasp that Netflix was not just a content distributor—it was a data‑driven entertainment ecosystem.
Netflix’s ability to predict audience behavior, scale globally, and monetize IP across formats gave it an edge Ellison and others could not match. The Warner Bros deal is proof that the future belongs to platforms that combine technology with storytelling.
Conclusion
Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros is more than a headline—it’s a turning point. David Ellison’s failed bid underscores the limits of old‑guard Hollywood thinking. The lesson is clear: streaming is not the future, it is the present.
For policymakers, investors, and audiences, the message is unmistakable: Netflix didn’t just buy Warner Bros—it rewrote the rules of Hollywood.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News4 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China5 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada5 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict5 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy4 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Democracy4 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital5 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
