Connect with us

Digital

Social Media and polarization of society

Published

on

Social Media has witnessed a mushroom growth that has impacted the discourse of political, cultural and religious systems by providing the equal opportunity of freedom of expression and of sharing an opinion or viewpoint on any issue.

Social Media has played a greater role in rightwing politics that paved the way for populist politicians to reach out to their voters.

Though Social Media has connected the people around the world, at the same time, it is causing division or disintegration and facilitating the social media lobbyists to polarize the communication so much the people support the arguments or opinions or political tirades against leaders without fact checking.

The world has been rocked by social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube because the users of these social networks have already surpassed millions and are growing, but due to the limited regulatory framework, fake news, cyberbullying, extremism and terrorism has reached new heights.

The influencers’ interactions with social media users have polarized the political and social circles that led to the formation of online echo chambers, a tactic of social media recommendations by politicians to influence the users to strengthen their narrative regardless of facts that whether it is right or wrong, but it is knit in a manner that echo chambers appear to be normal for the people thus changing the way of thinking and increasing the supporters base.

The echo chambers post such content that we enjoy a lot while reading, while keeping us away from the content that may stir a debate or arguments or expression of our disagreement over certain social, economic, religious, cultural or policy matters.

The echo chambers keep ideas flowing on a regular basis to the one side –the positive side of the argument, while its negative side is deliberately concealed to hide the facts.

This is the big issue that might be discussed with students, who should be informed and taught at school, college or degree level so that positive and constructive use of this digital medium could be ensured.

Social media connectivity around the world is undoubtedly amazing but the problems it created for both people and students are very dangerous, and need to be addressed and regulated.

Digital media, especially social media, for a long time remained unbridled to post any content that may fall in the purview of hatred, racism, bullying, derogatory remarks, character assault, rebellion, or anti-state elements instigating people to create chaos using the olive branch of social media. Since it was not monitored given the type of content being circulated and the information of people posting such content, including their motives behind such content as may have a constant flow of information that is recommended by the users pretending to be professionals, experts and mentors.

Alarmingly, people without fact-checking go on sharing the content and thus creating hype for such an issue as does not have a basis and was the result of a conspiracy to exert pressure on some person or leaders to get some favours.

The schools and colleges should chalk out the initiative to create awareness and practice of fair use so that social platforms should not post single or one-sided opinions or arguments but should welcome both so that positive use could be ensured. This will further the importance of social media.

Sometimes, the active echo chambers or volcanoes erupt over such issues as may be beneficial for the wider circle of society, but this finds serious criticism masterminded by people with an individual approach. They term it detrimental for them since it did not serve their interests, though it might have been beneficial for general people.

ALSO READ :  Managing Human Resource in Multiple Environments: The Challenges and Possibilities

Humans have an intuitional inclination to communicate with like-minded people or the people with the same choices on social media, thus the echo chambers get even stronger. The discourse that discourages dissenting voices always comes under fire from the thinkers and intellectuals of the nation since it is tantamount to concealing the facts from the people.

The world is coming closer after the covid-19 pandemic that engulfed the entire world, bringing misery and economic crisis. The social media debates go with biased and unbiased approaches regarding getting the vaccine. Some optimists termed it great, while some pessimists or biased approaches raised questions.

The echo chambers try to influence their opinions and win support.Similarly, echo chambers of both Democrats and Republicans only canvassed for their candidates but the leaders instigated the masses to attack Capitol Hill through social media and emotional speeches using their influence on social media, especially Twitter .

Some researchers have found that echo chambers influence people to win support but social media influencers have a follower-base of millions, and may polarize the public and politics, since influencers share success stories like internet marketers compelling you to buy their products.

The opinion leaders and experts reveal that for the last two decades, the percentage of American people having consistently holding liberal or conservative beliefs— rather than a blend of the two, which is the case for most people— has increased from 10 percent to over 20. Beliefs about the other side are becoming more negative creating an alarming situation.

Since 1994, the number of people who see the opposing political party as a threat to “the nation’s well-being or security” has doubled, which heralds how deepening polarization has predictable results raising eyebrows.

The government shutdowns, violent protests, scathing attacks on elected officials, the capitol Hill incident –all indicate that social media have been polarizing the political system and divided the nation each passing day due to echo chambers of both mainstream parties regarding the issues of health, security, human rights, employment and environment.

According to evidence from empirical research conducted on US politicians, politicians following extreme ideologies attracted a larger public audience than those who were moderate, which is the real example of echo chambers.

Usually, messages containing extreme thoughts, emotional instigation, patriotism, or criticizing the opposition received a warm welcome on social media platforms than those messages reflecting merely information.

The polarization of issues and political ideology will have serious repercussions in future that should be addressed on a timely basis so that societies could be saved from further isolation and disintegration.

The issues could be resolved through educating the people and creating awareness about the fair and professional use of social media channels for advocacy for winning support for legislation, an issue, a policy or employment.

Instead of showing the dark side of the issue, we have to educate people regarding both pros and cons of matters of importance for the general public rather than misleading the people with biased approaches to oppose the initiative of the government, community or civil society for the general benefit.

ALSO READ :  WHATSAPP Privacy Concerns Affecting Public Data -MOIT&T Pakistan

Social Media network operators are the bigwigs and the most influential in this.They cannot be controlled but only  be regulated by framing such laws that  may ensure fair use of this digital platform and are careful so that users may not face any legal issue by discussing sensitive issues such as desecration of holy places, religions, personalities, anti-state tirades, rebellion, terrorism, extremism and so on. The sensitive issue may stir protests and cause legal proceedings, if the cyber-regulatory laws are implemented to discourage the influence of one-sided opinions or campaigns.

We cannot deny the importance of social media platforms as they provide equal opportunity to people to express and share their thoughts or opinions, but safe and thoughtful use of these platforms will encourage healthy discourse and prove pivotal in promoting dialogue to discuss social, economical and cultural issues peacefully without hitting the sentiments of other communities.

Thus, echo chambers will be less powerful to build a narrative that is appealing but the readers will be engaging themselves in the debates that need interaction.

Undoubtedly, social media platforms have changed the political and social approach of the people and enabled face-to-face digital interaction through video and audio conference calls, so their fair use will mitigate their cons manifold.

The social media networks apply algorithms to connect you with like-minded people but it is up to you whether your engagement in communication is either unbiased or biased.

Social media should be promoting positive discourse to explore the political and economic solutions to the problems of people by reflecting the two sides of the coin so that the discourse be constructive and problem-solving. Social media has given a voice to marginalized people and governments are compelled to resolve the issues of people on a priority basis due to trending topics of social media.

Even the populist leaders may face resistance from social media as the public makes the most of the freedom of expression and criticizes the role of politicians for their failure to address the issues of the public.

In recent times, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have been creating history in highlighting issues of both public and national interest but at the same time such platforms have been taken by storm by those influencers who continue to feed the news about their vested interests and create psychosocial hype for any issue that may jolt the power corridors of Government.

The politicians always take to Twitter for their precise viewpoint and policy debate and are usually followed by millions of followers. Even the print and electronic media take the tweets as policy statements or the narrative of some party or group.

The schools and colleges should chalk out the initiative to create awareness and practice of fair use so that social platforms should not post single or one-sided opinions or arguments but should welcome both so that positive use could be ensured. This will further the importance of social media.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Digital

Google Pixel 8 Pro: Unveiling the Enhanced Pixel Experience with the New Pixel Launcher Update in Response to Digital Markets Act

Published

on

Introduction

In response to the Digital Markets Act, Google has released a major update for its Pixel phones, namely the Google Pixel 8 Pro, amid the ever-evolving world of technology and law. The user experience has been altered with this update, primarily concentrating on the home screen with the redesigned Pixel launcher. Let’s examine this clever new feature’s specifics and ramifications.

Understanding the Digital Markets Act

The Digital Markets Act is a legislative initiative impacting users within the European Union. It aims to regulate large tech companies’ behaviour, including Google, to ensure fair competition and protect consumers’ interests. While currently affecting EU users, other countries like the U.S., U.K., and beyond are closely monitoring these developments for potential adoption of similar laws.

Evolution of Google Pixel Experience

Google’s Pixel phones have been known for their clean Android experience and timely updates. With each iteration, Google strives to enhance user satisfaction by introducing new features and improvements. The Pixel 8 Pro continues this tradition by refining the user interface with a focus on the home screen.

Unveiling the New Pixel Launcher

The centrepiece of this update is the Pixel launcher, which serves as the gateway to the phone’s functionalities. The new launcher offers a more intuitive and personalized experience, catering to users’ preferences and habits. From enhanced customization options to improved organization features, users can expect a seamless interaction with their device.

ALSO READ :  Novak Djokovic Outlasts Stan Wawrinka at Wimbledon 2023, Secures Fourth-Round Spot

Key Features of the Updated Pixel Launcher

  1. Enhanced Personalization: Users can now customize their home screen layout, widgets, and app icons to reflect their unique style and needs.
  2. Smart Suggestions: The launcher intelligently predicts apps and actions based on usage patterns, streamlining daily tasks for increased efficiency.
  3. Improved Organization: With better categorization of apps and notifications, users can easily navigate through their digital ecosystem without clutter.
  4. Integration with Google Services: Seamless integration with Google’s ecosystem enhances productivity and connectivity across devices.

Implications for Users

The updated Pixel launcher not only elevates the user experience but also aligns with regulatory requirements set forth by the Digital Markets Act. By offering more control and transparency over data usage and app recommendations, Google aims to foster trust among users while complying with evolving regulatory standards.

Future Outlook

As governments worldwide observe the impact of the Digital Markets Act on tech giants like Google, discussions around similar regulations are gaining momentum. The proactive approach taken by Google in updating its Pixel phones sets a precedent for other companies to adapt to changing regulatory landscapes while prioritizing user satisfaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the introduction of the new Pixel launcher in the Google Pixel 8 Pro marks a significant step towards enhancing user experience and complying with regulatory frameworks like the Digital Markets Act. By embracing innovation and user-centric design, Google continues to set benchmarks in the smartphone industry while navigating complex legal landscapes with agility and foresight.

By combining technological advancements with regulatory compliance, Google paves the way for a more transparent and user-friendly digital future.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Andrew Kang Buys Original Pepe NFT for Undisclosed Sum at Sotheby’s Sale

Published

on

Andrew Kang, co-founder of Mechanism Capital, has acquired the original Pepe NFT for an undisclosed amount in a Sotheby’s sale. The NFT was last sold for a staggering $3.5 million in October 2021. The purchase of the original Pepe NFT by Kang has created a buzz in the crypto community, with many speculating on the significance of the purchase.

Andrew Kang buys Pepe NFT at Sotheby's from 3AC estate. Mechanism Capital co-founder involved

Pepe the Frog, a cartoon character created by artist Matt Furie, became an internet sensation in the early 2000s. The Pepe NFT was created in 2016 as a digital representation of the character and quickly gained popularity in the crypto world. The purchase of the original Pepe NFT is significant as it is considered a piece of internet history and a symbol of the early days of NFTs.

Key Takeaways

  • Andrew Kang, co-founder of Mechanism Capital, has acquired the original Pepe NFT for an undisclosed amount in a Sotheby’s sale.
  • The Pepe NFT is considered a piece of internet history and a symbol of the early days of NFTs.
  • Kang’s acquisition of the original Pepe NFT has created a buzz in the crypto community.

Andrew Kang’s Acquisition

Andrew Kang acquires Pepe NFT from 3AC estate at Sotheby's sale. Mechanism Capital co-founder involved

Mechanism Capital co-founder Andrew Kang recently made an undisclosed purchase of the original Pepe NFT from 3AC estate in Sotheby’s sale. The NFT was last sold for $3.5 million in October 2021.

Mechanism Capital’s Involvement

Mechanism Capital is a cryptocurrency investment firm that manages a portfolio of digital assets. Andrew Kang is one of the co-founders of the firm, and his acquisition of the original Pepe NFT demonstrates the firm’s interest in investing in the NFT market.

Sotheby’s Sale Details

The original Pepe NFT was sold by 3AC estate in Sotheby’s sale, which is a well-known auction house for fine art and other collectibles. The sale was held in October 2021, and the NFT was reportedly purchased for $3.5 million at the time.

Andrew Kang’s acquisition of the original Pepe NFT highlights the growing interest in NFTs and their potential as an investment vehicle. The purchase also demonstrates the increasing involvement of cryptocurrency investment firms in the NFT market.

ALSO READ :  17 Sundance-Winning Films Everyone Should Watch: A Professional List

Historical Context of Pepe NFT

Andrew Kang buys original Pepe NFT at Sotheby's sale. Mechanism Capital co-founder. Historical context

Pepe NFT is a digital asset that gained popularity in the crypto art world due to its unique and humorous design. The character, Pepe the Frog, was created by artist Matt Furie in 2005 as part of his comic series, Boy’s Club. However, the character was later adopted by certain online communities and became associated with controversial political movements.

In recent years, Pepe NFTs have become highly sought after by collectors and investors alike. The original Pepe NFT was created by Furie in 2015 and was sold in an auction for $1,025 in 2016. Since then, the value of Pepe NFTs has skyrocketed, with some fetching millions of dollars in sales.

Previous Sale in October 2021

The Pepe NFT that Andrew Kang recently purchased was last sold for $3.5 million in October 2021. The sale was conducted by Sotheby’s, a renowned auction house that has been actively involved in the sale of NFTs. The auction was part of a larger sale by 3AC Estate, a crypto art collection managed by the venture firm, 3AC.

The sale of the Pepe NFT generated significant buzz in the crypto art community, with many speculating that it could break previous records for NFT sales. The final price of the NFT was not disclosed, but it is believed to have sold for a substantial amount.

Overall, the sale of the original Pepe NFT highlights the growing interest in crypto art and the potential for significant financial gains for collectors and investors. As the market for NFTs continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how prices and demand for these digital assets change over time.

The Significance of NFT Purchases

Andrew Kang buys original Pepe NFT at Sotheby's sale for Mechanism Capital co-founder

NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, have been making headlines in the art world and beyond. These digital assets use blockchain technology to verify ownership and authenticity, creating a new market for unique and collectible items. The purchase of the original Pepe NFT by Andrew Kang is just one example of the growing interest in this emerging field.

One significant aspect of NFT purchases is the potential for artists to earn more money from their work. With traditional art sales, artists often receive only a fraction of the final sale price. However, with NFTs, artists can receive a percentage of each subsequent sale, providing a new revenue stream and a way to protect their intellectual property.

Another important factor is the role of NFTs in the broader digital economy. As more transactions move online, NFTs offer a way to create scarcity and value in a digital space. This has implications for everything from gaming to social media, as creators and users seek ways to monetize their content.

ALSO READ :  Digital Pakistan Internship Portal Launched

Overall, the purchase of the original Pepe NFT by Andrew Kang highlights the growing interest and potential of NFTs in the art world and beyond. As the technology continues to evolve and gain traction, it will be interesting to see how it transforms the way we think about ownership, value, and creativity in the digital age.

Frequently Asked Questions

Andrew Kang buys Pepe NFT from 3AC estate at Sotheby's sale for Mechanism Capital

What is the significance of the original Pepe NFT?

The original Pepe NFT is considered a significant piece of digital art history and is widely recognized as the first-ever rare Pepes NFT. The Pepes NFTs were created in 2016 as a parody of the popular internet meme, Pepe the Frog. The original Pepe NFT is a one-of-a-kind piece of art that has been highly sought after by collectors in the NFT community.

Who is Andrew Kang and what is his association with Mechanism Capital?

Andrew Kang is a co-founder of Mechanism Capital, a cryptocurrency investment firm. He is a well-known figure in the NFT community and has been actively involved in NFT investments and collections. Kang’s purchase of the original Pepe NFT highlights his interest in acquiring rare and significant pieces of digital art.

How does the sale of the original Pepe NFT reflect on the current NFT market trends?

The sale of the original Pepe NFT for an undisclosed sum highlights the growing demand for rare and unique NFTs. The NFT market has seen a surge in popularity in recent years, with high-profile sales and auctions attracting significant attention from investors and collectors. The sale of the original Pepe NFT is a testament to the growing interest in NFTs as a viable investment opportunity.

What was the previous sale price of the original Pepe NFT, and how does it compare to the latest sale?

The original Pepe NFT was last sold for $3.5 million in October 2021. The latest sale price of the NFT has not been disclosed. However, the fact that the NFT was sold for an undisclosed sum suggests that it was likely sold for a higher price than the previous sale.

What role did Sotheby’s play in the sale of the original Pepe NFT from the 3AC estate?

Sotheby’s, the well-known auction house, facilitated the sale of the original Pepe NFT from the 3AC estate. The auction house has been actively involved in the sale of high-profile NFTs, including the sale of the world’s first NFT artwork by Beeple for $69 million in March 2021. Sotheby’s involvement in the sale of the original Pepe NFT highlights the growing interest in NFTs among traditional art collectors and investors.

Can you explain the impact of high-profile NFT sales on the digital art community?

High-profile NFT sales have had a significant impact on the digital art community, bringing increased attention and recognition to the medium. The sale of high-profile NFTs has also led to increased demand for digital art, with artists and collectors alike looking to capitalize on the growing interest in the medium. The sale of the original Pepe NFT is just one example of the impact that NFTs are having on the wider art world, as traditional art collectors and investors begin to take notice of the potential of this emerging asset class.

Continue Reading

China

The Battle Over TikTok: Can the Company Fight Back?

Published

on

pexels-photo-5081920.jpeg

The battle over TikTok has raged for months as the United States government has grown increasingly concerned about the potential security risks posed by the popular social media app’s Chinese ownership. In August 2020, President Trump signed an executive order that would have banned TikTok in the US unless its ownership was transferred to an American company. A federal judge later blocked the order, but the threat of a ban has loomed over the app ever since.

A tense standoff in Congress as lawmakers debate the fate of TikTok, with the app's Chinese owner at the center of the controversy

Recently, the US Congress took a first step towards forcing TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sell the app. The move came in the form of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which was signed into law in December 2020. The law requires foreign companies listed on US stock exchanges to comply with US auditing regulations or face delisting. ByteDance is currently in the process of exploring options to comply with the law, including a possible sale of TikTok to a US buyer.

Key Takeaways

  • The US government has been concerned about the security risks posed by TikTok’s Chinese ownership, and the threat of a ban has loomed over the app for months.
  • The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act requires foreign companies listed on US stock exchanges to comply with US auditing regulations or face delisting, which could force ByteDance to sell TikTok to a US buyer.
  • The battle over TikTok highlights the economic and political stakes of technology ownership and raises important questions about legislative actions and corporate responses to national security concerns.

Legislative Actions

US Congress passed a bill targeting TikTok's Chinese owner. The scene shows lawmakers debating and voting on the legislation

The battle over TikTok has led to a series of legislative actions by the US Congress. In August 2020, Congress took the first step towards forcing the app’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to divest TikTok’s US operations to a US-based company. This was in response to concerns over national security and the potential for user data to be accessed by the Chinese government.

Congressional Steps Toward Divestment

The divestment order was issued by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a government agency responsible for reviewing foreign investment in US companies. This order required ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US operations within 90 days, or face a ban on the app in the US.

In response, ByteDance filed a lawsuit challenging the divestment order, arguing that it was not given due process and that the order was politically motivated. However, the lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in December 2020.

Legal Implications

The battle over TikTok has raised important legal questions about the relationship between national security and foreign investment in the US. The divestment order issued by CFIUS was based on concerns over national security, but it is unclear whether such concerns can be used to justify forcing a foreign company to sell its US operations.

ALSO READ :  Will Donald Trump be President in 2024? Examining the Odds and Challenges

Moreover, the battle over TikTok has highlighted the challenges of regulating social media platforms that are owned by foreign companies. TikTok’s Chinese ownership has raised concerns over the potential for user data to be accessed by the Chinese government, leading to calls for greater regulation of social media platforms.

Overall, the battle over TikTok has demonstrated the complex legal and regulatory challenges posed by foreign investment in the US, particularly in the technology sector. While Congress has taken steps towards divesting TikTok’s US operations, the legal implications of such actions remain unclear.

Corporate Response

US Congress confronts TikTok's Chinese owner in a corporate showdown

Company’s Defense Strategy

TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, has vowed to fight back against the US Congress’s decision to force it to sell off the app’s US operations. The company is reportedly considering several options to defend itself, including legal action, lobbying efforts, and potential partnerships with US companies.

ByteDance has argued that the move by Congress is politically motivated and violates the company’s rights. The company has also emphasized that TikTok’s US user data is stored in the US and is not subject to Chinese government control.

To bolster its defence, ByteDance has hired a team of high-profile lawyers, including former US Solicitor General Theodore Olson. The company is also reportedly exploring potential partnerships with US companies, such as Microsoft, to help address concerns about data security.

Public Relations Efforts

In addition to its legal and lobbying efforts, ByteDance has launched a public relations campaign to defend the app and its Chinese ownership. The company has emphasized TikTok’s popularity and cultural impact, highlighting its role in promoting diversity and creativity.

ByteDance has also sought to distance itself from the Chinese government, emphasizing that it operates independently and is not subject to Chinese censorship laws. The company has also emphasized its commitment to data privacy and security, noting that it stores user data in the US and other countries outside of China.

Despite these efforts, ByteDance faces an uphill battle to defend TikTok’s US operations. The company will need to address concerns about data security and potential Chinese government influence, while also convincing US lawmakers and regulators that it can operate independently and in the best interests of US users.

Economic and Political Stakes

US Congress debates TikTok's fate, symbolized by a scale weighing economic and political stakes

The battle over TikTok has major economic and political implications for both the United States and China. With more than 91 million users in the US alone, TikTok has become a significant player in the social media landscape, and its popularity has made it a target of concern for US lawmakers. The recent moves by the US Congress to force the app’s Chinese owner to sell it off have raised questions about the future of the app and its impact on US-China relations.

Impact on US-China Relations

The battle over TikTok has the potential to further strain already tense relations between the US and China. The Trump administration has been vocal in its criticism of China, and the move to force the sale of TikTok is just the latest in a series of actions taken against Chinese companies. The Chinese government has responded with its own set of measures, including new restrictions on US tech companies operating in China.

ALSO READ :  Digital Pakistan Internship Portal Launched

The ongoing battle over TikTok has also highlighted concerns about data privacy and security. US lawmakers have raised concerns about the app’s data collection practices and the potential for the Chinese government to access user data. China has denied any wrongdoing and has accused the US of using national security concerns as a pretext for protectionism.

Consequences for Global Markets

The battle over TikTok has wider implications for global markets. The app’s popularity has made it a significant player in the social media landscape, and its forced sale could have ripple effects on the tech industry as a whole. The move could also have implications for other Chinese companies operating in the US, and could lead to a wider crackdown on Chinese investment in the US.

The battle over TikTok is likely to continue for some time, and the outcome is far from certain. However, the economic and political stakes are high, and the impact of the battle could be felt for years to come.

Frequently Asked Questions

US Congress confronts TikTok's Chinese owner in a battle

What is the rationale behind the US Congress’s move to force a sale of TikTok?

The US Congress has expressed concerns about the potential national security risks posed by TikTok’s ownership by Chinese company ByteDance. Lawmakers have cited fears that TikTok’s data collection practices may be used by the Chinese government to gather sensitive information on US citizens. The move to force a sale of TikTok is seen as a way to mitigate these risks.

What is the status of the legislation aimed at banning TikTok?

As of the current date, no legislation has been passed to ban TikTok in the US. However, the US Department of Commerce has taken steps to restrict the app’s use in the country. In September 2020, the Department announced that it would ban TikTok from US app stores, though this decision was later temporarily blocked by a federal judge.

How might TikTok’s ownership respond to the US legislative actions?

TikTok’s ownership has previously pushed back against US legislative actions aimed at restricting the app’s use. The company has argued that it operates independently of the Chinese government and has taken steps to distance itself from its Chinese roots, including hiring US-based executives and establishing a US-based subsidiary. However, it remains to be seen how the company will respond to the latest legislative actions aimed at forcing a sale of the app.

What are the potential consequences for users if TikTok is banned in the US?

If TikTok is banned in the US, users may lose access to the app’s social media features, including the ability to create and share short-form videos. However, it is worth noting that TikTok’s popularity has led to the emergence of several alternative social media apps that offer similar features, such as Instagram’s Reels and Byte, which was created by the co-founder of Vine.

Has any legislation been passed to date regarding the prohibition of TikTok?

As of the current date, no legislation has been passed to prohibit the use of TikTok in the US. However, the US government has taken steps to restrict the app’s use, including the aforementioned ban on TikTok in US app stores.

Which other countries have taken steps to ban or restrict TikTok?

Several other countries, including India and Pakistan, have taken steps to ban or restrict TikTok over concerns about national security and user privacy. In India, TikTok was banned in June 2020, along with several other Chinese-owned apps. In Pakistan, the government has announced plans to ban TikTok unless the app takes steps to address concerns about “obscenity and immorality.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2019-2024 ,The Monitor . All Rights Reserved .