Connect with us


TPNW can prevent nuclear disaster in South Asia



The second Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons began at the United Nations Headquarters on 27 November and will continue until 1 December 2023. Ambassador (Dr.) Juan Ramón de la Fuente (Mexico) was elected as President of the Meeting.

António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations calls the Treaty “an important step towards the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons and a strong demonstration of support for multilateral approaches to nuclear disarmament.”

Ambassador Melissa Parke of Australia and the Executive Director of ‘International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons’ (ICAN) warned the world body during the high-level opening statement that “Nuclear-armed states, instead of pursuing disarmament following their legal obligations, are squandering tens of billions of dollars every year to ‘improve’ and expand their arsenals. A theft from the world’s poor. An insult to all who value peace…Some of these same states are also waging wars of aggression – with staggering death tolls and undeniable nuclear risks…Against this backdrop of bloodshed, we must renew our call not only for nuclear disarmament, but also, more broadly, for multilateral approaches to peace and security, and for adherence to the international rule of law, based on the UN Charter.”

It is worth mentioning here that ICAN was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 for the leadership role it played in achieving Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

Arundhati Roy, an Indian novelist and activist was representing the aspirations of hundreds of millions of people all over the world when she wrote in “Cost of Living” that “It is such a supreme folly to believe that nuclear weapons are deadly only if they’re used. The fact that they exist at all, their presence in our lives, will wreak more havoc than we can begin to fathom. Nuclear weapons pervade our thinking. Control our behaviour. Administer our societies. Inform our dreams. They bury themselves like meat hooks deep in the base of our brains. They are purveyors of madness. They are the ultimate colonizer. Whiter than any white man that ever lived. The very heart of whiteness.”

I completely agree with Ms. Roy for her foresight about the danger of the existence of nuclear weapons. Perhaps not by coincidence, the danger of nuclear threat in South Asia should be of paramount interest to the world body. Kashmir is the bone of contention in the nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan. It has been regarded by President Bill Clinton as the most dangerous place on earth. Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, Helen Clark said, “Kashmir is a nuclear flashpoint.” Kashmir is the only nation in the world which is surrounded by three nuclear powers – India, Pakistan & China. Perhaps that was the reason that former President Obama said on November 10, 2010, in New Delhi, “The resolution of Kashmir is in the interest of India, Pakistan and the region and the United States.”

ALSO READ :  Oscar Nominations 2024: Top Contenders for Winning the Award

Kashmir currently has more than 900,000 military and paramilitary troops occupying the Valley with no more than 10 million people, a ratio of one soldier for every 10 citizens. However, because of their concentration in the towns and cities, the density is more like 5 to one. Imagine what that would be like on your city block.

Having so many troops in this small country whose size is no greater in square miles than the U.S. state of Tennessee should certainly be a cause for concern by anyone. Why are Indian forces there? Where’s the war? Is neighbouring Pakistan about to invade? Is China? Do they have a similar number of troops amassing at the border? This is more than three times the number of troops the U.S. had at the height of the Iraq War. The answer is None of the Above. It’s a curious fact that we have a very circular problem inherent in a deep paranoia India has long had of an uprising and its use of such troops to maintain control and put down any threat has become a way of life. It’s like avoiding a fire by burning down the house first.

The possibility of such an uprising is greatly enhanced and exacerbated by the presence of these troops and would more likely be a direct provocation for such an uprising and has been. Rather than relieve the pressure in the cooker by taking it off the fire, India’s solution has been to simply turn up the burner. The greatest cause of discontent is this constant abrasive to the social conscience, this erosion of trust in New Delhi, and a pervasive atmosphere of fear. People look for leadership elsewhere in their ranks, and they have. There is a deeply entrenched movement at the grassroots level that has become very influential in being the voice of public opinion.

ALSO READ :  Sources Reveal New Details on Trump's Inaction During Jan. 6 Insurrection

It is a historical fact that when the Kashmir dispute erupted in 1947-1948, the United States championed the stand that the future status of Kashmir must be ascertained following the wishes and aspirations of the people of the territory. The United States was the principal sponsor of resolution # 47 which was adopted by the Security Council on 21 April 1948 and based on that unchallenged principle. Following the resolution, the United States, a leading member of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP), adhered to that stand.  The basic formula for settlement was incorporated in the resolutions of that Commission adopted on 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949.

But India would not then and will not now honour that commitment or admit that its claim to Kashmir is illegitimate. And it will not admit to the world that the people of Kashmir have no faith in Indian democracy. Perhaps India believes that if it keeps repeating the same lie over and over again, that Kashmir is an integral part of India, things will settle down if a few carrots are offered, and the problem will go away.

Who knows it better than India that the cry for azadi (Freedom) in Kashmir has simply gotten louder? As such the level of tensions between India and Kashmir and between India and Pakistan show few signs of letting up any time soon. And ignoring the decades-old problem of refusing to resolve the question of Kashmiri sovereignty and self-determination has not only led to deep unrest among the Kashmiris; it has also led to two wars between India and Pakistan. That they are now both nuclear-armed states raises the stakes dramatically and calls for action to defuse these tensions immediately.

Perhaps it’s time the major powers take this seriously. The answer is plain as day for anyone. Kashmir has international legitimacy. It has international sanctity. It commits the United Nations Security Council. These commitments should once and for all be honoured. The clock is ticking. Every day that passes without a resolution of the Kashmir dispute is one day closer to a cataclysm that will reach far beyond the borders of all countries involved.

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai is also Secretary General World Kashmir Awareness Forum.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply


How Breaking Up GE Saved the Company: Analysis of the Three New Companies’ Shares



Larry Culp, the CEO of General Electric, has been credited with saving the company by breaking it up. General Electric, once the most valuable company in the world, had been struggling for years due to poor management decisions and a lack of focus. However, Culp’s bold decision to break up the company into three separate entities has breathed new life into the struggling conglomerate.

A broken chain with the initials "GE" lies in pieces, while a figure in the distance works to piece it back together

The breakup strategy involved spinning off GE’s healthcare and oil and gas businesses, leaving behind a leaner, more focused company that can better compete in today’s fast-paced business environment. The move was met with scepticism at first, with many analysts questioning whether it was the right decision. However, Culp’s vision has paid off, as shares of the three new companies have been performing well, and investors are beginning to take notice.

The impact on shareholders has been positive, with many seeing a significant increase in the value of their investments. The future of GE looks bright, with the company now better positioned to take advantage of emerging technologies and trends. While there are still challenges ahead, Culp’s leadership and strategic vision have put General Electric back on track.

  • Larry Culp saved GE by breaking it up into three separate entities.
  • The breakup strategy has resulted in positive outcomes for shareholders.
  • The future of GE looks bright, with the company now better positioned to take advantage of emerging technologies and trends.

The Breakup Strategy

A crumbling puzzle of interconnected gears, each labeled with a different division of General Electric, symbolizing the impending breakup of the company

Larry Culp, the CEO of General Electric (GE), took a bold step to save the company from its financial troubles by breaking it up. This strategy involved spinning off the non-core businesses of the conglomerate and focusing on the core businesses that had the potential to generate profits. The following are the key steps that Larry Culp took to implement his breakup strategy.

Identifying the Core Businesses

Larry Culp identified the core businesses of GE that had the potential to generate profits. These businesses included aviation, healthcare, and power. He decided to focus on these businesses and divest the non-core businesses that were not generating profits. This allowed GE to reduce its debt and focus on the businesses that had the potential to generate profits.

ALSO READ :  Google Tributes Farooq Qaiser's 78th Birthday with Doodle

The Spin-Off Process

The spin-off process involved creating three new companies out of the existing businesses of GE. These companies were GE Aviation, GE Healthcare, and GE Power. The spin-off process was completed in March 2019, and the three new companies started trading as independent entities. This allowed the new companies to focus on their core businesses and generate profits.

Financial Restructuring

The breakup strategy also involved financial restructuring. This included reducing debt, improving cash flow, and strengthening the balance sheet. The financial restructuring allowed GE to reduce its debt burden and improve its financial position. This, in turn, allowed the company to focus on its core businesses and generate profits.

In conclusion, Larry Culp’s breakup strategy saved GE from its financial troubles by focusing on the core businesses and divesting the non-core businesses. The strategy allowed GE to reduce its debt burden, improve its financial position, and focus on the businesses that had the potential to generate profits.

Impact on Shareholders

GE's transformation depicted through shattered company logo, symbolizing Culp's breakup strategy. Shareholders' reaction evident in falling stock prices

Larry Culp’s decision to break up General Electric (GE) had a significant impact on the company’s shareholders. The move was aimed at unlocking value for investors by creating three independent companies. This section explores the impact of the breakup on GE’s stock performance and investor confidence.

Stock Performance

The breakup of GE has been well-received by investors, with the stock price rising by over 30% since the announcement. The three new companies – GE Aviation, GE Healthcare, and GE Renewable Energy – are expected to have strong growth prospects, which has contributed to the positive sentiment among investors.

Investor Confidence

The breakup of GE has also helped to restore investor confidence in the company. Prior to the breakup, GE had been struggling with a range of issues, including high levels of debt and underperforming businesses. The breakup has allowed GE to focus on its core businesses, which is expected to lead to improved financial performance.

Investors are also optimistic about the leadership of Larry Culp, who has a track record of turning around struggling companies. Culp’s decision to break up GE has been seen as a bold move that demonstrates his commitment to creating value for shareholders.

Overall, the breakup of GE has had a positive impact on the company’s shareholders. The move has unlocked value for investors and restored confidence in the company’s future prospects.

The Future of GE

General Electric's breakup: shattered logo pieces, scattered across a futuristic cityscape, with a sense of both chaos and potential

Independent Companies

Larry Culp’s decision to break up General Electric into three independent companies – GE Aviation, GE Healthcare, and GE Power – has been a significant move to restructure the company. It is expected that the new independent companies will be more agile, efficient, and able to focus on their respective businesses. The move will enable each company to make decisions based on their unique needs and priorities, which will result in better performance and growth.

ALSO READ :  US warns of 'consequences' if China abandons trade deal

Market Predictions

The market is optimistic about the future of the three independent companies. According to a report by SSRN, breaking up GE would be challenging because of the financials of its units. However, the report also suggests that the future of the other businesses will be determined by Michael Culp’s ability to execute his plan successfully.

The report also indicates that the shares of the three new companies look attractive, which is a good sign for investors. It is expected that the companies will be able to generate strong cash flows and returns, which will drive their growth in the future.

Overall, the future of GE looks promising, and the decision to break up the company is expected to yield positive results. The independent companies will be able to focus on their businesses and make decisions based on their unique needs and priorities, which will result in better performance and growth. Investors are optimistic about the future of the new companies, and it is expected that they will generate strong cash flows and returns, which will drive their growth in the future.

Frequently Asked Questions

GE's logo shattered into pieces, symbolizing the company's breakup. The pieces lay scattered on the ground, representing the end of an era

How will GE’s breakup impact current shareholders?

GE’s breakup will have a significant impact on current shareholders. The company plans to spin off its healthcare, aviation, and energy businesses into separate companies, which will each have their own stock. Current GE shareholders will receive shares in each of the new companies, and the value of their holdings will depend on the performance of each individual company.

What are the expected benefits of splitting GE into separate companies?

Breaking up GE is expected to create more focused and efficient businesses, with each company able to better allocate resources and focus on its core competencies. The move is also expected to unlock value for shareholders, as each company will be better positioned to compete in its respective market.

What will be the focus of each company formed from GE’s breakup?

The healthcare company will focus on medical technology and life sciences, while the aviation company will focus on aircraft engines and related services. The energy company will focus on power generation, renewable energy, and grid solutions.

How does the spinoff affect GE’s long-term business strategy?

The spinoff is part of a broader effort by GE to restructure its business and focus on its core competencies. The company has struggled in recent years, and the spinoff is seen as a way to streamline operations and improve profitability.

What are the timelines for GE’s planned spinoffs?

The spinoff of GE’s healthcare business is expected to be completed in 2020, while the aviation and energy spinoffs are expected to be completed in 2023.

How will the market valuation of the new GE companies compare to the original?

It is difficult to predict how the market valuation of the new GE companies will compare to the original. However, the spinoff is expected to unlock value for shareholders, and each company will be better positioned to compete in its respective market.

Continue Reading


Decoding Delay: How SCOTUS Impacted Trump’s Election Legal Battles



men and a woman protesting in front of the supreme court of the united states


In the aftermath of the 2020 US Presidential election, one of the most contentious in recent history, former President Donald Trump and his legal team pursued various avenues to challenge the results. Among these efforts, a significant focus was placed on legal battles that made their way to the highest court in the land – the US Supreme Court. This article delves into how the Supreme Court’s actions, or lack thereof, contributed to delaying Trump’s legal reckoning over the 2020 election.

The Context: Trump’s Legal Challenges Post-Election
Following his defeat in the 2020 Presidential election to Joe Biden, Donald Trump and his legal team embarked on a series of legal challenges aimed at overturning the results. Allegations of widespread voter fraud and irregularities formed the basis of these challenges, with Trump and his supporters claiming that the election had been stolen.

The Supreme Court’s Role: A Critical Juncture
As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court holds immense power and influence over legal matters of national significance. In the wake of Trump’s legal challenges, many looked to the Court to provide clarity and resolution to the disputes surrounding the election.

1: The Texas Lawsuit and SCOTUS’ Decision
One of the most high-profile cases brought before the Supreme Court was Texas v. Pennsylvania, where Texas sought to challenge the election results in several battleground states. The lawsuit alleged that these states had violated the Constitution in their conduct of the election. However, in a controversial move, the Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, declining to hear it on its merits.

ALSO READ :  Turkey in the Black Sea Region: Risks for Russia?

2: Lack of Clarity on Election Law
One key aspect that emerged from the Supreme Court’s handling of post-election cases was its reluctance to wade into disputes involving state election laws. The Court’s decisions highlighted a hesitancy to intervene in what it deemed as matters best left to state legislatures.

3: Impact on Trump’s Legal Strategy
The Supreme Court’s actions, or lack thereof, had a significant impact on Trump’s legal strategy post-election. With several key cases either dismissed or not taken up by the Court, Trump and his legal team faced setbacks in their efforts to challenge the election results through judicial means.

In conclusion, the US Supreme Court played a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of Trump’s legal challenges following the 2020 election. By choosing not to intervene in certain cases or dismissing others on procedural grounds, the Court effectively delayed any potential legal reckoning for Trump over his claims of election fraud. As we reflect on this chapter in American political history, it becomes clear that even the highest court in the land is not immune to controversy and scrutiny.

Continue Reading


Navigating Market Volatility: A Comprehensive Analysis of PCE Inflation Data, Fedspeak, and Dell Earnings




In the dynamic world of finance, staying informed about key indicators and events is crucial for making sound investment decisions. This article delves into the significance of Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data, Fedspeak, and Dell earnings, offering insights on what to watch for in these areas.

Understanding PCE Inflation Data:
PCE inflation data is a vital economic indicator that measures changes in prices faced by consumers for goods and services. Analyzing this data provides valuable insights into consumer spending patterns, inflation trends, and overall economic health. Investors closely monitor PCE inflation data as it influences monetary policy decisions by central banks like the Federal Reserve.

Interpreting Fedspeak:
“Fedspeak” refers to the public statements made by Federal Reserve officials regarding monetary policy, economic outlook, and interest rates. These statements are scrutinized by market participants for clues about future policy actions. Understanding Fedspeak requires interpreting the nuances of language used by Fed officials to gauge their sentiment and potential policy shifts.

Impact of Dell Earnings on Markets:
Dell Technologies, a prominent player in the technology sector, regularly reports its earnings which can have a significant impact on stock prices and market sentiment. Investors analyze Dell’s financial performance, revenue growth, and guidance to assess the company’s health and industry trends. Positive earnings results from Dell can boost investor confidence in the tech sector while disappointing figures may lead to market volatility.

Key Factors to Watch:

  • PCE Inflation Trends: Keep an eye on PCE inflation data releases to gauge consumer spending behavior and inflationary pressures.
  • Fedspeak Statements: Monitor speeches and comments from Federal Reserve officials for insights into future monetary policy decisions.
  • Dell Earnings Report: Stay informed about Dell’s earnings announcements to understand tech sector performance and broader market implications.
ALSO READ :  Paralysis in Congress Makes America a Dysfunctional Superpower: An Analysis

Strategies for Investors:

  • Diversification: Spread investments across different asset classes to mitigate risks associated with market volatility.
  • Stay Informed: Regularly follow updates on PCE inflation data, Fedspeak, and corporate earnings reports to make informed investment decisions.
  • Long-Term Perspective: Focus on long-term investment goals rather than short-term market fluctuations driven by events like earnings releases.

In conclusion, staying abreast of key economic indicators like PCE inflation data, interpreting Fedspeak accurately, and monitoring corporate earnings such as Dell’s can provide valuable insights for investors navigating volatile markets. By understanding the implications of these factors and adopting sound investment strategies, individuals can make informed decisions to achieve their financial goals amidst market uncertainties.

Continue Reading




Copyright © 2019-2024 ,The Monitor . All Rights Reserved .