Connect with us

Analysis

Pakistan’s Education Conundrum: Challenges and Strategic Solutions for Reform

Published

on

Pakistan’s education system faces serious challenges that stop many children from getting the learning they need. Millions of young students, especially those aged 5 to 16, remain out of school. This crisis is not just about numbers but the deep-rooted issues like low public spending, outdated policies, and poor quality in teaching that affect the country’s future.

Understanding what causes these problems and how they affect society is key to finding real solutions. This article explores why Pakistan’s education system is struggling and what steps might help fix it.

These challenges create a cycle where poverty and illiteracy keep reinforcing each other. Despite some efforts, the system struggles to offer the skills and knowledge students need to succeed in today’s world.

The core problem is that Pakistan’s education system is trapped between a lack of funding, ineffective management, and growing inequality that limits access for many children.

Key Takeaways

  • Many children in Pakistan cannot access basic education due to financial and social barriers.
  • The education system suffers from poor quality and weak management.
  • Effective reforms require better funding, improved policies, and focus on equal access.

Current State of Education in Pakistan

Pakistan faces several major challenges in education, including limited access to schools, poor quality of learning institutions, insufficient teacher training, and a wide gap between urban and rural education. These issues greatly affect enrollment, learning outcomes, and future opportunities for millions of children.

Access to Schools

Access to education in Pakistan remains a major barrier. Over 25 million children are out of school, with the highest numbers in rural and remote areas. Many regions lack enough schools, especially for girls. Social and economic factors also prevent attendance. Families often prioritize work over education due to poverty.

Limited public funding restricts new school construction. Transportation and unsafe routes to schools keep children, particularly girls, away. While urban areas tend to have better infrastructure, rural regions face severe school shortages. This results in over 36% of children nationwide not attending school.

Quality of Educational Institutions

The quality of education across Pakistan’s schools varies widely and often remains poor. Many schools suffer from outdated textbooks, weak curricula, and lack of basic facilities. Proper learning environments are rare, with overcrowded classrooms and insufficient learning materials common.

Government schools generally provide lower-quality education compared to private institutions, although private schools often charge fees that many families cannot afford. Low learning outcomes persist. Students frequently leave school without mastering essential skills like reading and math.

Teacher Training and Capacity

Teacher quality in Pakistan is a critical issue. Most teachers receive limited training, which affects their ability to engage students or deliver effective lessons. Many are not updated on modern teaching methods, reducing classroom effectiveness.

Low salaries demotivate teachers and contribute to absenteeism. In rural areas, finding qualified teachers is even harder. Many educators lack confidence in handling diverse student needs or managing classrooms. Training programs exist but are inconsistent and underfunded, leading to gaps in teacher performance.

Urban-Rural Disparities

Education access and quality vary sharply between urban and rural areas. Cities benefit from better infrastructure, more schools, and higher teacher availability. Private schooling options are more common, offering better resources and learning environments.

Rural communities face severe disadvantages. Schools are scarce, poorly maintained, and lack trained teachers. Cultural norms may discourage girls’ education. These disparities reinforce cycles of poverty and limit social mobility in rural populations.

AspectUrban AreasRural Areas
School AvailabilityGenerally adequateVery limited
Teacher QualityHigher training levelsOften underqualified
InfrastructureBetter facilities and resourcesPoor or missing basic facilities
Female EnrollmentHigher compared to ruralMuch lower, with cultural barriers

Historical Context and Policy Evolution

Pakistan’s education system has deep roots in its colonial past, influencing how schools and curricula developed after independence. Over time, the government introduced various reforms aimed at addressing challenges like low literacy and uneven quality. However, the success of these reforms depended heavily on how policies were implemented across regions.

Legacy of Colonial Education Frameworks

Pakistan inherited an education system designed primarily to serve colonial interests rather than national development. The British focused on creating a small educated elite to work in administration. This left a fragmented structure, with limited access for the majority of the population. The curriculum emphasized rote learning and ignored local languages and cultures.

ALSO READ :  The Unforgettable Disregard: A Moral Crisis in the West's Treatment of Palestinians

After 1947, the country struggled to reshape this inherited system. Many schools remained urban and elite-focused, while rural areas lacked facilities. The colonial legacy also left a strong divide between English-medium and vernacular schools. This historical setup created long-term challenges in expanding quality education to all segments of society.

Major Education Reforms

Since independence, Pakistan has launched several major reforms to improve education access, quality, and relevance. Key policies included the 1972 National Education Policy, which aimed to standardize curricula and expand primary education. The 1992 policy introduced a shift toward decentralization and greater involvement of provincial governments.

Reforms also focused on religious education integration, skill-based learning, and literacy enhancement programs. Despite these efforts, inconsistent funding and political changes often disrupted progress. Policies oscillated between centralized control and decentralized initiatives, creating confusion among administrators and schools.

YearKey ReformFocus
1972National Education PolicyCurriculum standardization
1992Decentralization reformProvincial control & autonomy
2009Literacy & skill programsImproving youth literacy rates

Government Policy Implementation

The effectiveness of education policies in Pakistan has been limited by poor implementation. Challenges include insufficient funding, lack of trained teachers, and weak monitoring systems. Many policies remain on paper without clear follow-up or resources to back them up.

Regional disparities also affect implementation. Provinces with less infrastructure struggle to apply national policies effectively. Political instability and frequent changes in education leadership further disrupt continuity. Additionally, bureaucratic delays and corruption have slowed the development of schools and teaching quality.

Efforts to involve local communities and private sectors have grown but are uneven. Successful policy implementation requires consistent support, accountability, and adapting strategies to local needs.

Socioeconomic Barriers to Learning

Access to education in Pakistan is deeply affected by economic conditions, social customs, and geography. These factors create obstacles that keep many children from fully benefiting from schooling. Poverty limits resources, cultural gender roles affect who attends school, and where a child lives influences education quality.

Poverty and Affordability

Many families in Pakistan live below the poverty line, which makes it hard to afford school expenses like uniforms, books, and transportation. Even when tuition is free, indirect costs can be too high for poor households.

Children from low-income families often must work to support their families. This reduces their time and energy for learning. Schools in poorer areas also lack basic facilities and trained teachers.

Because of these issues, dropout rates are high among children from poor families, especially after primary school. Poverty also affects nutrition and health, which impacts concentration and attendance in school.

Gender Inequality

In many parts of Pakistan, girls face more barriers to education than boys. Cultural norms often prioritize boys’ schooling and encourage girls to stay at home or marry early.

Safety concerns, lack of female teachers, and distant schools discourage families from sending girls to school. This limits girls’ access to education beyond the elementary level in some regions.

Girls who do attend school often study in overcrowded or poorly resourced environments. Gender bias in textbooks and teaching methods can also affect how girls learn and perform.

Regional Disparities

Education quality and access vary widely between urban and rural areas. Cities generally have better schools, more teachers, and stronger infrastructure.

Rural areas often suffer from fewer schools, poorly trained teachers, and lack of basic facilities like clean water and electricity. Many schools in these areas are difficult to reach, especially for girls.

Regions affected by conflict or poverty have even lower enrollment rates. These geographic differences create unequal opportunities for children based solely on where they live.

FactorUrban AreasRural Areas
School QuantityMany schoolsFew schools
Teaching QualityGenerally better-trainedOften untrained or absent
FacilitiesAdequate facilitiesPoor or missing facilities
SafetyRelatively saferConcerns over travel safety

Curriculum and Language Challenges

Pakistan’s education faces major hurdles with language choice, curriculum design, and textbook quality. These factors affect how well students learn and how the system adapts to diverse needs across the country.

Medium of Instruction Dilemma

The main languages used in schools are Urdu and English, while over 70 regional languages are spoken nationwide. This creates a gap for many children who speak local languages at home. When taught in Urdu or English, these students often struggle to understand and keep up.

The lack of early education in native languages limits student engagement and learning outcomes. Schools rarely switch to regional languages or use bilingual teaching methods. Resistance from teachers, limited resources, and policy gaps make introducing local languages difficult.

ALSO READ :  🇺🇸 Washington's Civil War Over Israel: How the 'America First' Fissure is Reshaping the GOP

Without proper support, many learners face disadvantages that widen educational inequality. Bridging this language gap is key to improving access and success rates in schools.

Curriculum Relevance

Much of Pakistan’s curriculum is outdated and does not reflect local culture or current global knowledge. Subjects often focus on rote memorization rather than critical thinking or practical skills.

The Single National Curriculum aims to standardize content but faces uneven implementation, with rural areas lacking enough materials and trained teachers. Political influences sometimes shape curricula that prioritize ideology over quality education.

There is a growing call for curricula that relate better to students’ lives and future job markets. This requires frequent updates and inclusion of diverse regional perspectives.

Textbook Quality

Textbooks in Pakistan vary widely in quality and relevance. Many contain errors, outdated information, and politically biased content. Poor production standards reduce durability and usability.

Access to quality books is uneven, especially in remote or underfunded schools. Some areas rely on secondhand or unofficial materials. Teachers report lacking adequate, clear resources to deliver lessons effectively.

Efforts to improve textbook content and distribution need to focus on accurate information, cultural inclusion, and alignment with modern teaching methods. Enhancing textbook quality can significantly impact student learning outcomes.

Public vs Private Sector Education

Pakistan’s education system is divided mainly into public and private sectors. Public schools are run by the government and aim to provide free or low-cost education. Private schools charge tuition and often have better facilities and resources but are less affordable for many families.

Key Differences:

AspectPublic SchoolsPrivate Schools
CostLow or freeExpensive, varies widely
QualityVaries, often limitedGenerally better, but inconsistent
Teacher TrainingOften lacks investmentMore focus on faculty development
AccessibilityMore accessible to low-income familiesMostly for middle and upper income groups

Private schools in Pakistan often outperform public schools in student results. This is partly due to better resources, smaller class sizes, and more qualified teachers. However, quality control in private education is inconsistent because of weak regulation.

Public schools face challenges like underfunding and overcrowding. Many lack basic infrastructure and qualified teachers. This contributes to a significant gap in educational outcomes between the two sectors.

Both sectors play important roles. Public schools serve the majority of children, while private schools cater to those who can afford them. There is growing support for public-private partnerships to improve quality and access in public education. Community involvement and government support are seen as crucial steps to bridge this divide.

Impact of Technology and Innovation

Technology is changing how education works in Pakistan, but the effects are uneven. Some students gain greatly from new learning tools, while others still lack access to basic digital resources. Innovations like AI and mobile learning hold promise but face obstacles tied to infrastructure and policy.

Digital Divide

The digital divide in Pakistan shows a clear gap between urban and rural areas. Many rural regions lack reliable internet and electricity, making it hard for students to benefit from online learning or digital tools. Urban schools tend to have better access to computers and mobile devices, giving their students an advantage.

This gap also affects gender equity. Girls in remote areas often face more barriers to technology access, which limits their education opportunities. Poor infrastructure and high costs intensify these challenges.

Efforts to close this divide include government and NGO projects aimed at expanding internet access and providing affordable devices. Still, significant work remains to ensure equal digital learning chances nationwide.

E-Learning Initiatives

Pakistan has introduced several e-learning programs to support education through technology. Projects like DigiSkills offer free online courses that teach digital and technical skills to young people, preparing them for jobs.

The Learning Passport, backed by UNICEF, targets marginalized children, providing digital education resources that reach beyond traditional schools. This helps children, especially girls, overcome logistical and social barriers.

These initiatives use mobile-friendly platforms and multimedia to engage students. However, challenges such as teacher training, content relevance, and internet reliability need ongoing attention to maximize impact.

Pathways Forward and Proposed Solutions

Addressing Pakistan’s education challenges requires targeted steps in policy, community support, and future planning. Solutions must improve access, teacher quality, infrastructure, and technology while involving local stakeholders. Each approach plays a key role in building a more effective system.

Policy Recommendations

Effective policies need clear focus on funding, training, and curriculum updates. Increasing budget allocation to education is essential to fix poor infrastructure and provide learning materials. Teacher training programs must prioritize skills for active, project-based learning rather than rote methods.

Curriculum reforms should align with modern needs, including digital literacy and critical thinking. Policies should promote gender equality and accessibility to ensure no group is left behind.

Regular monitoring and evaluation can track progress and reveal gaps. Using data to guide decisions helps avoid repeating past mistakes and allocates resources efficiently.

Community Involvement

Local communities play a crucial role in supporting schools and boosting enrollment. Community engagement can improve accountability and encourage parental involvement, which affects student attendance and success.

School management committees should include parents and local leaders. Their participation helps adapt education to community needs and values.

Awareness campaigns can promote the importance of education, especially for girls, to overcome cultural barriers.

Partnering with non-profits and private sectors can bring extra resources and innovation. Community-backed initiatives tend to be more sustainable and responsive.

Future Outlook

Technology and research-driven policies will shape Pakistan’s education future. Integrating digital tools can expand access to remote areas and support personalized learning.

Investing in education research provides evidence-based approaches to reform. This data-backed method helps create resilient systems able to adjust to challenges like natural disasters or economic shifts.

The growing young population demands faster, scalable solutions. Emphasizing skills for the job market will link education more directly to economic growth.

Sustained political will is critical. Without ongoing commitment, progress will remain slow, and disparities will persist.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Analysis

Folsom High School Football: More Than a Game, It’s an Economic Engine

Published

on

High school football is often dismissed as a pastime, a Friday night ritual confined to bleachers and scoreboards. Yet in towns like Folsom, California, the sport has become a socioeconomic engine. Folsom High School football is not just about touchdowns—it’s about recruitment pipelines, local business growth, and the cultural identity of a community.

Macro Context: The Business of High School Sports

Across the United States, high school athletics are evolving into a billion‑dollar ecosystem. Sponsorships, streaming rights, and recruitment networks are reshaping what was once purely extracurricular. For policymakers and business leaders, this shift demands attention: sports are no longer just about play, they are about economics.

Folsom High School football exemplifies this transformation. With a legacy of championships and a reputation as a California high school football powerhouse, the Bulldogs have become a case study in how athletics ripple into broader economic and cultural spheres.

Regional Insights: Folsom’s Legacy

The Bulldogs’ record speaks for itself: multiple state titles, nationally ranked players, and a program that consistently feeds talent into college football. But the legacy extends beyond the field.

  • Recruitment Pipeline: Folsom’s roster has produced athletes who go on to Division I programs, drawing scouts and media attention.
  • Community Identity: Friday night games are cultural events, uniting families, alumni, and local businesses.
  • Media Reach: Coverage of the Bulldogs amplifies Folsom’s profile, positioning the town as a hub of athletic excellence.

Keywords like Folsom Bulldogs football schedule and Folsom football state championship history are not just search terms—they are markers of a program that commands attention.

ALSO READ :  UN Failure to Contain Israel: The Way Forward on War Crimes and Genocide in Gaza

Business & Community Impact

The economic footprint of Folsom football is undeniable. Local restaurants see surges in sales on game nights. Merchandising—from jerseys to branded gear—creates revenue streams. Sponsorships tie local businesses to the prestige of the Bulldogs, reinforcing community bonds.

Beyond dollars, the program fosters youth development. Student‑athletes learn discipline, teamwork, and resilience—skills that translate into workforce readiness. For parents and educators, the balance between academics and athletics is a constant negotiation, but one that underscores the broader value of sports.

Opinion: The Columnist’s Perspective

As a senior columnist, I argue that high school football is undervalued as an economic driver. Folsom proves that sports can shape workforce pipelines, community identity, and local business ecosystems.

The contrarian view is clear: policymakers and business leaders should treat high school athletics as strategic investments. Ignoring programs like Folsom’s risks overlooking a vital engine of socioeconomic growth.

While Wall Street debates interest rates and GDP, the real story of resilience and identity is unfolding under Friday night lights.

Conclusion

Folsom High School football is not just about wins—it’s about shaping California’s economy and culture. From recruitment pipelines to local business surges, the Bulldogs embody the intersection of sport and society.

The lesson is simple: sports are a mirror of our priorities and potential. And in Folsom, that reflection is bright, bold, and instructive for the nation.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Pennsylvania’s Economy at a Crossroads: Why Local Signals from WNEP Matter Nationally

Published

on

Our Editorial Chief and senior columnist’s opinion on how regional shifts in PA reflect the broader U.S. economy.

Introduction

The U.S. economy is often measured in sweeping national statistics—GDP growth, inflation rates, and interest‑rate decisions. Yet the real pulse of America’s financial health beats in its local communities. Pennsylvania, with its diverse industries and working‑class backbone, offers a telling microcosm of national trends. And through outlets like WNEP, local anxieties and aspirations are broadcast daily, shaping how residents—and by extension, the nation—interpret the state of the economy.

Macro Context: The National Economy Meets Local Reality

At the national level, policymakers are grappling with inflationary pressures, uneven job growth, and questions about consumer confidence. Wall Street analysts debate whether the U.S. economy is heading for a soft landing or a prolonged slowdown. But in Pennsylvania (PA), these abstract debates translate into tangible realities: factory shifts, small business closures, and household budgets stretched thin.

Pennsylvania’s economy has long been a bellwether. Its manufacturing hubs, energy corridors, and healthcare networks mirror the broader U.S. industrial mix. When the state’s job market tightens or consumer spending dips, it often foreshadows national patterns.

Regional Insights: WNEP and the Pennsylvania Lens

Local news outlets like WNEP play a critical role in contextualising these shifts. Coverage of rising grocery prices, layoffs in regional plants, or new infrastructure projects provides a ground‑level view of the economy that national headlines often miss.

  • Manufacturing: Once the backbone of PA’s economy, it now faces global competition and automation challenges.
  • Healthcare: A growing sector, yet burdened by staffing shortages and rising costs.
  • Logistics & Energy: Pennsylvania’s geographic position makes it a hub for distribution and energy production, sectors that are sensitive to national policy shifts.
ALSO READ :  Trump vs. Biden: A Presidential Rematch - Campaign Strategies, Key Issues, and Election Predictions

By reporting on these industries, WNEP not only informs residents but also contributes to the national narrative.

Business & Consumer Implications

For small businesses in PA, the economy is not an abstract concept—it’s survival. Rising interest rates make borrowing harder, while inflation erodes margins. Consumers, meanwhile, adjust by cutting discretionary spending, delaying home purchases, or seeking additional income streams.

This dynamic reflects a broader truth: the health of the U.S. economy is inextricably linked to the resilience of its local communities. Pennsylvania’s struggles and successes are America’s struggles and successes.

Opinion: The Columnist’s Perspective

As a senior columnist, I argue that local economies are the real pulse of national health. Wall Street optimism often overlooks Main Street realities. Ignoring signals from places like Pennsylvania risks misreading the bigger picture.

Consider this: while national GDP may show growth, if households in Scranton or Harrisburg are tightening belts, the sustainability of that growth is questionable. WNEP’s coverage of local hardships—job losses, rising costs, community resilience—offers insights that policymakers and investors cannot afford to ignore.

The contrarian view here is simple: the economy’s future may be written in Pennsylvania.

Conclusion

Pennsylvania’s economy is not just regional—it is predictive. From manufacturing floors to local newsrooms, the signals emanating from PA offer a window into America’s trajectory. Policymakers, investors, and readers alike must pay attention to these local cues.

As WNEP continues to spotlight the lived realities of Pennsylvanians, the rest of the nation would do well to listen.

Continue Reading

AI

US Stock Market Forecast 2026: Wall Street Eyes Double-Digit Gains Amid ‘AI Bubble’ Anxiety

Published

on

Executive Summary: Key Takeaways

  • Bullish Consensus: Major banks including Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, and JPMorgan project the S&P 500 could breach 8,000 by 2026, implying double-digit upside.
  • The “Capex” Conundrum: Big Tech is on track to spend over $400 billion on AI infrastructure, sparking fears of a 2000-style dot-com crash if ROI lags.
  • Sector Rotation: Smart money is looking beyond the “Magnificent Seven” to utilities, industrials, and defense stocks that power the physical AI build-out.
  • Fed Pivot: Falling interest rates in 2026 are expected to provide a critical tailwind for valuations, potentially offsetting slowing AI growth rates.

The Lead: A Market Divided

Wall Street has drawn a line in the sand for 2026, and the numbers are aggressively bullish. Despite a creeping sense of vertigo among retail investors and murmurs of an “AI bubble” in institutional circles, the heavyweights of global finance are betting on a roaring continuation of the bull market.

The central conflict defining the 2026 US Stock Market Forecast is a high-stakes tug-of-war: On one side, massive liquidity injections and corporate tax tailwinds are driving S&P 500 projections to record highs. On the other, the sheer scale of Tech sector CapEx—spending money that hasn’t yet returned a profit—is creating a fragility not seen since the late 1990s.

The Bull Case: Why Banks Are Betting on 8,000

The bullish thesis isn’t just about blind optimism; it is grounded in liquidity and earnings broadening.

ALSO READ :  The Unforgettable Disregard: A Moral Crisis in the West's Treatment of Palestinians

Morgan Stanley has set a towering target of 7,800, citing a “market-friendly policy mix” and the potential for corporate tax reductions to hit the bottom line. Their analysts argue that we are entering a phase of “positive operating leverage,” where companies trim fat and boost margins even if top-line revenue slows.

Deutsche Bank is even more aggressive, eyeing 8,000 by year-end 2026. Their rationale hinges on a successful “soft landing” orchestrated by the Federal Reserve. As rates stabilize and eventually fall, the cost of capital decreases, fueling P/E expansion not just in tech, but across the S&P 493 (the rest of the index).

JPMorgan offers a nuanced “Base Case” of 7,500, but their “Bull Case” aligns with the 8,000 predictions. Their strategists highlight that earnings growth is projected to hit 13-15% over the next two years. Crucially, they believe this growth is broadening. It is no longer just about Nvidia selling chips; it is about banks, healthcare firms, and retailers deploying those chips to cut costs.

The Bear Counter-Argument: The $400 Billion Question

While the targets are high, the floor is shaky. The “Elephant in the Room” is the unprecedented rate of spending on Artificial Intelligence without commensurate revenue.

Collectively, hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta) are pacing toward $400 billion in annual capital expenditures. This “Capex Supercycle” has investors jittery. Recent reports of slowing growth in Microsoft’s Azure AI division—missing analyst estimates—have acted as a tremor, hinting that the seemingly infinite demand for AI might have a ceiling.

The fear mirrors the Dot-com Bubble. In 2000, companies overbuilt fiber-optic networks anticipating traffic that didn’t arrive for years. Today, the risk is that companies are overbuilding data centers for AI models that businesses aren’t yet ready to monetize. If Big Tech margins compress due to this spending, the S&P 500—weighted heavily in these names—could face a correction of 10-20%, a risk explicitly acknowledged by executives at Goldman Sachs.

ALSO READ :  China's Heartbreak: The unforgettable Nanjing Massacre

Sector Watch: Where the Real Value Hides

If the tech trade is crowded, where is the “smart money” moving for 2026?

  • Utilities & Energy: AI models are thirsty. They require massive amounts of electricity. Utilities are no longer just defensive dividend plays; they are growth engines essential for the AI grid.
  • Industrials: The physical build-out of data centers requires HVAC systems, steel, and logistics. This “pick and shovel” approach offers exposure to the AI theme without the valuation premium of a software stock.
  • Defense & Aerospace: With geopolitical fragmentation continuing, defense spending is becoming a structural growth story, detached from the vagaries of the consumer economy.

Wall Street Consensus: 2025 vs. 2026 Targets

The table below illustrates the widening gap between current trading levels and the street’s 2026 optimism.

Bank / Firm2025 Year-End Outlook2026 Price TargetPrimary Catalyst
Deutsche Bank~7,0008,000Robust earnings growth & AI adoption
Morgan Stanley~6,8007,800Tax cuts & Fed easing
Wells Fargo~6,9007,800Inflation stabilization
JPMorgan~6,7007,500 – 8,000Broadening earnings (Base vs Bull case)
HSBC~6,7007,500Two-speed economic growth

Conclusion: Navigating the “Wall of Worry”

The consensus for 2026 is clear: the path of least resistance is up, but the ride will be volatile. The projected double-digit gains are contingent on two factors: the Federal Reserve cutting rates without reigniting inflation, and Big Tech proving that their billions in AI spending can generate real cash flow.

For the savvy investor, 2026 is not the year to chase an index fund blindly. It is the year to look for cyclical rotation—investing in the companies that build the grid, finance the expansion, and secure the borders, while keeping a watchful eye on the valuations of the Magnificent Seven.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2019-2025 ,The Monitor . All Rights Reserved .

Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading