News
Is the U.S.-India Partnership on Shaky Ground? Biden Declines New Delhi Invitation Amidst Foiled Assassination Plot
Table of Contents
Introduction
The U.S.-India partnership has been a cornerstone of American foreign policy in Asia, with both countries sharing common interests in economic, security, and diplomatic spheres. However, recent developments have raised questions about the future of this strategic relationship. U.S. President Joe Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to visit India has been interpreted by some as a sign of a rift between the two nations. Moreover, the discovery of a foiled assassination plot targeting a Sikh separatist in the United States, allegedly orchestrated by an Indian official, has further strained the relationship.
The implications of these events have been widely debated, with some suggesting that the U.S.-India partnership is on shaky ground. India’s government has downplayed the significance of the assassination plot, but the incident has raised concerns about India’s commitment to democratic values and human rights. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has raised the issue with Indian officials at the highest levels, indicating that the plot could have serious consequences for the bilateral relationship.

Key Takeaways
- Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to India has raised concerns about the future of the U.S.-India partnership.
- The foiled assassination plot targeting a Sikh separatist in the U.S. has strained the relationship and raised questions about India’s commitment to democratic values and human rights.
- The incident could have serious consequences for the bilateral relationship, a cornerstone of American foreign policy in Asia.
Context of U.S.-India Relations
The United States and India have had a complex relationship over the years. The two countries have had their fair share of ups and downs, but the relationship has been on an upward trajectory in recent years. The relationship has been strengthened by several factors, including shared economic interests, a common commitment to democracy, and a growing strategic partnership.
The U.S.-India relationship has been characterized by several key developments over the years. In the 1990s, the two countries began to build closer ties, driven by shared economic interests and a desire to counterbalance China’s growing influence in the region. This led to the signing of the U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Agreement in 2008, which was a major milestone in the relationship.
Since then, the relationship has continued to grow, with the two countries working together on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change. In 2021, President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed the importance of the Quad in supporting a free, open, inclusive, and resilient Indo-Pacific.
However, recent events have raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India relationship. In December 2023, an assassination plot targeting a Sikh leader was foiled by U.S. authorities. While the plot was not officially linked to the Indian government, it has raised concerns about the potential impact on the relationship. As a result, President Biden declined an invitation to visit New Delhi, and Modi’s government has judged that the incident won’t have serious consequences.
Despite these challenges, the U.S.-India relationship remains an important one, with significant implications for both countries and the broader region. As the two countries continue to navigate these challenges, it will be important to maintain open lines of communication and work together to address shared challenges.
Biden’s Declined Invitation: Implications and Analysis
President Biden’s recent decision to decline an invitation to visit New Delhi has raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India partnership. The invitation was extended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who hoped to strengthen ties between the two countries. However, Biden’s decision to decline the invitation has been interpreted by some as a sign that the partnership may be on shaky ground.
One factor that may have influenced Biden’s decision is the recent assassination plot against a Sikh leader in the United States, which was reportedly foiled by U.S. authorities. The plot is believed to have been orchestrated by individuals with links to the Indian government, which has caused tension between the two countries. Modi’s government has downplayed the incident, but some analysts believe that it may have contributed to Biden’s decision to decline the invitation.
Despite this setback, the U.S.-India partnership remains an important strategic relationship for both countries. The two countries have a shared interest in promoting regional stability and economic growth and have worked together on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change.
Moving forward, it will be important for both countries to continue to build on this partnership, even in the face of challenges. This may require a renewed commitment to dialogue and diplomacy, as well as a willingness to address difficult issues head-on. Ultimately, the success of the U.S.-India partnership will depend on the ability of both countries to work together in a constructive and collaborative manner.
Assassination Plot: Repercussions and India’s Stance
The recent assassination plot of a Sikh activist on U.S. soil has raised questions about the stability of the U.S.-India partnership. While U.S. authorities foiled the plot, Modi’s government has judged that it won’t have serious consequences.
According to an article in Foreign Policy, Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to New Delhi has been seen as a snub by some in India. However, the Modi government has downplayed the significance of this and has emphasized that the U.S.-India partnership is strong.
The Indian government has denied any involvement in the assassination plot and has stated that it is committed to maintaining a strong relationship with the United States. As reported by Reuters, the Indian government has taken steps to reassure the United States that it is committed to fighting terrorism and maintaining a strong partnership.
Despite this, the assassination plot has highlighted some of the challenges in the U.S.-India relationship. As reported by The New York Times, the plot has exposed the fragility of the U.S. ties with India. The article argues that the U.S. needs to be more cautious in its relationship with India and that it needs to be aware of the potential risks involved.
Overall, while the assassination plot has raised concerns about the U.S.-India partnership, both governments have emphasized that they are committed to maintaining a strong relationship. However, the incident has highlighted some of the challenges and risks involved in this relationship, and it remains to be seen how these will be addressed in the future.
Strategic Interests and Challenges
The U.S.-India partnership has been a cornerstone of the United States foreign policy in the Indo-Pacific region. Both countries have been working closely on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change. However, recent events have raised questions about the future of this partnership.
One of the key challenges facing the U.S.-India partnership is the growing influence of China in the region. China’s aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea and its Belt and Road Initiative have raised concerns among U.S. policymakers. India, too, has been wary of China’s growing influence in the region. As a result, the U.S. and India have been working together to counter China’s influence.
Another challenge facing the U.S.-India partnership is the recent assassination plot that was foiled by U.S. intelligence agencies. The plot, which was allegedly masterminded by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), targeted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While the plot was foiled, it has raised questions about the security of the U.S.-India partnership. The fact that the U.S. was able to uncover the plot has led some in India to question whether the U.S. can be trusted as a reliable partner.
Despite these challenges, the U.S.-India partnership remains vital to both countries’ strategic interests. The two countries have a shared interest in promoting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. They also have a shared interest in countering terrorism, promoting economic growth, and addressing climate change. As such, the U.S.-India partnership will likely continue to grow and evolve in the coming years.
Economic Ties and Trade Agreements
The U.S.-India partnership has been regarded as one of the most important relationships in the world, with both countries being major economies and trading partners. In 2021, the two countries announced a partnership for global good, with a focus on building a strategic partnership and working together with regional groupings, including ASEAN and Quad [1].
Underscoring the close bilateral economic and trade relationship, the United States and India terminated six WTO disputes in June 2023, and India removed retaliatory tariffs on select U.S. products [2]. This move was seen as a significant step towards improving economic ties between the two countries.
In addition, the U.S. and India have been partnering on Open RAN field trials and rollouts, including scaled deployments, in both countries with operators and vendors of both markets, backed by U.S. and Indian government support [3]. This partnership is expected to enhance the development of 5G technology and strengthen trade relations between the two countries.
Despite these positive developments, the recent decline of President Biden’s invitation to visit New Delhi and the U.S.-foiled assassination plot have raised concerns about the stability of the U.S.-India partnership. However, it remains to be seen whether these events will have any significant impact on the economic ties and trade agreements between the two countries.
Defence and Security Cooperation
The United States and India have made significant progress in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region. The two countries have been rapidly expanding their military cooperation, with a senior Defense Department official calling it a “transformational moment” in the U.S.-India defence partnership.
However, recent events have raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India partnership. President Biden declined an invitation to visit India, citing scheduling conflicts. Additionally, a U.S.-foiled assassination plot has strained relations between the two countries.
Despite these recent developments, the United States and India remain committed to promoting policies that facilitate greater technology sharing, co-development, and defence trade. The two countries have also been working to deepen their overall relationship, with a focus on defense and security cooperation.
The U.S.-India partnership is critical to promoting regional stability and security. As such, both countries need to continue to work together to address any challenges that may arise and to deepen their cooperation in defence and security matters.
Diplomatic Perspectives and Future Engagements
The recent decline of US President Joe Biden’s invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has raised questions about the future of the US-India partnership. The decision comes after the US foiled an assassination plot against Modi, which has been downplayed by the Indian government as having no serious consequences.
Despite the setback, both countries remain committed to strengthening their partnership. In a joint statement released in June 2023, the US and India pledged to deepen their cooperation in areas such as defence, trade, and climate change. The statement also reiterated their shared commitment to democratic values and the rule of law.
Moving forward, the US and India will need to navigate several challenges to maintain their partnership. One of the biggest obstacles is India’s growing ties with China, which has caused concern in Washington. The US has also been critical of India’s human rights record, particularly in the disputed region of Kashmir.
Conclusion
To address these issues, both countries will need to engage in frank and open dialogue. They will also need to work together to find common ground on issues of mutual concern. This could involve increased collaboration on regional security issues, such as counterterrorism and maritime security.
Overall, while the US-India partnership may face some challenges in the years ahead, both countries remain committed to deepening their cooperation. As they work to address their differences and build on their shared values, they will continue to play a critical role in shaping the future of the Indo-Pacific region.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Corruption
Transparency International Pakistan releases NCPS 2025
ISLAMABAD—Transparency International Pakistan (TIP) on Tuesday released its comprehensive National Corruption Perception Survey (NCPS) 2025, presenting a mixed picture of public sentiment on corruption, anti-graft efforts, and governance across the country.
The survey, conducted with 4,000 respondents from all four provinces, reveals that while a significant majority of citizens did not report paying a bribe in the last year, three key public sectors—the Police, Tender/Procurement, and the Judiciary—continue to be perceived as the most corruption-prone institutions.
Table of Contents
Police Top List Despite Perception Improvement
According to the NCPS 2025 findings, the Police remains the most corrupt sector in the eyes of the public, cited by 24% of respondents nationwide. This is followed by the Tender and Procurement process at 16%, and the Judiciary at 14%.
However, the report highlighted a subtle but “notable” positive shift in public perception regarding the Police, registering a 6% improvement in perceived behaviour and service delivery compared to the previous survey.
Low Bribery Rate vs. High Dissatisfaction
The survey’s most encouraging statistic is that a majority of citizens (66%) reported they did not feel compelled to pay a bribe for public services in the past 12 months, which TIP considers a strong indicator of perceived progress in service delivery. Provincially, Sindh reported the highest rate of citizens encountering a demand for a bribe at 46%.
Despite the low rate of personal bribery, public satisfaction with the government’s overall efforts to combat corruption remains low. A significant 77% of respondents nationwide expressed “low satisfaction” or were “not satisfied” with the government’s anti-corruption drive.
The public identified the three major causes driving corruption as a lack of accountability (15%), lack of transparency and limited access to information (15%), and delays in the disposal of corruption cases (14%).
Demand for Accountability of Anti-Graft Bodies
The survey findings reflect a strong public demand for institutional reform and accountability. An overwhelming 78% of Pakistanis believe that anti-corruption institutions like the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) should themselves be more accountable and transparent.
Citizens also proposed a blueprint for curbing corruption, prioritising:
- Enhancing accountability (26%)
- Limiting discretionary powers (23%)
- Strengthening Right to Information laws (20%)
The report also found a notable lack of awareness regarding reporting channels, with 70% of citizens being unaware of any official corruption reporting mechanism. Furthermore, 42% stated they would feel safe reporting corruption only if strong whistleblower protection laws were in place.
Economic Stability and Political Finance
On economic matters, approximately 58% of respondents indicated that the government has either fully or partially stabilised the economy, crediting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme and the country’s exit from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List. However, 57% reported a decline in their purchasing power over the past year.
The survey also highlighted a strong public desire for clean electoral financing, with a combined 83% of respondents supporting either a complete ban or strict regulation of business funding to political parties.
In response to the report, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed the survey, stating that the large number of respondents who reported not encountering corruption during his government reflects the public’s recognition of the reforms aimed at transparency and economic recovery.
For more details on the survey’s public opinion findings, watch this report: Transparency International Report on Corruption – Public Opinion – 9 Dec 2025.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Entertainment
How Netflix Stole Warner Bros from David Ellison: Old Hollywood’s Miscalculation
For two decades, Netflix has been dismissed as a disruptor that would eventually plateau. Legacy Hollywood believed its dominance was temporary, a fad that would fade once the old guard flexed its muscle. Yet in 2025, the streaming pioneer pulled off a coup that stunned the industry: Netflix outmanoeuvred David Ellison’s Skydance and secured Warner Bros, rewriting the rules of entertainment economics.
Table of Contents
Macro Context: Streaming’s Rise and Hollywood’s Decline
The streaming wars have reshaped the global media landscape. Netflix, once a DVD‑by‑mail service, now commands billions in revenue and a subscriber base that dwarfs traditional cable. Meanwhile, legacy studios like Warner Bros Discovery struggled under debt, fragmented audiences, and outdated business models.
David Ellison’s Skydance, backed by ambition and capital, seemed poised to rescue Warner Bros. Yet Netflix’s strategic patience, global reach, and ability to monetise content across platforms proved decisive.
David Ellison’s Bid: Ambition Meets Reality
Ellison’s attempt to acquire Warner Bros was emblematic of Hollywood’s old guard—ambitious, well‑funded, but ultimately constrained by legacy thinking. Skydance’s merger talks with Paramount highlighted Ellison’s vision of building a modern studio empire. But when it came to Warner Bros, Netflix’s agility and scale proved insurmountable.
- Skydance Strategy: Focused on blockbuster franchises and traditional studio models.
- Netflix Strategy: Leveraged global subscriber data, AI‑driven content recommendations, and diversified revenue streams.
- Outcome: Ellison underestimated Netflix’s ability to play the long game.
Warner Bros: A Legacy Studio Recast
Warner Bros, once synonymous with Hollywood glamour, became a symbol of industry decline. Debt burdens, misaligned leadership, and fragmented IP portfolios left it vulnerable. Netflix’s acquisition was not just a business deal—it was a cultural takeover.
By absorbing Warner Bros, Netflix gained access to iconic franchises, a century of cinematic heritage, and a foothold in theatrical distribution. More importantly, it signaled that streaming had officially eclipsed legacy Hollywood.
Opinion: Why Old Hollywood Misread Netflix
As a senior columnist, I argue that Hollywood underestimated Netflix’s long game. For years, executives dismissed streaming as secondary to theatrical releases. They failed to grasp that Netflix was not just a content distributor—it was a data‑driven entertainment ecosystem.
Netflix’s ability to predict audience behavior, scale globally, and monetize IP across formats gave it an edge Ellison and others could not match. The Warner Bros deal is proof that the future belongs to platforms that combine technology with storytelling.
Conclusion
Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros is more than a headline—it’s a turning point. David Ellison’s failed bid underscores the limits of old‑guard Hollywood thinking. The lesson is clear: streaming is not the future, it is the present.
For policymakers, investors, and audiences, the message is unmistakable: Netflix didn’t just buy Warner Bros—it rewrote the rules of Hollywood.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Folsom High School Football: More Than a Game, It’s an Economic Engine
High school football is often dismissed as a pastime, a Friday night ritual confined to bleachers and scoreboards. Yet in towns like Folsom, California, the sport has become a socioeconomic engine. Folsom High School football is not just about touchdowns—it’s about recruitment pipelines, local business growth, and the cultural identity of a community.
Table of Contents
Macro Context: The Business of High School Sports
Across the United States, high school athletics are evolving into a billion‑dollar ecosystem. Sponsorships, streaming rights, and recruitment networks are reshaping what was once purely extracurricular. For policymakers and business leaders, this shift demands attention: sports are no longer just about play, they are about economics.
Folsom High School football exemplifies this transformation. With a legacy of championships and a reputation as a California high school football powerhouse, the Bulldogs have become a case study in how athletics ripple into broader economic and cultural spheres.
Regional Insights: Folsom’s Legacy
The Bulldogs’ record speaks for itself: multiple state titles, nationally ranked players, and a program that consistently feeds talent into college football. But the legacy extends beyond the field.
- Recruitment Pipeline: Folsom’s roster has produced athletes who go on to Division I programs, drawing scouts and media attention.
- Community Identity: Friday night games are cultural events, uniting families, alumni, and local businesses.
- Media Reach: Coverage of the Bulldogs amplifies Folsom’s profile, positioning the town as a hub of athletic excellence.
Keywords like Folsom Bulldogs football schedule and Folsom football state championship history are not just search terms—they are markers of a program that commands attention.
Business & Community Impact
The economic footprint of Folsom football is undeniable. Local restaurants see surges in sales on game nights. Merchandising—from jerseys to branded gear—creates revenue streams. Sponsorships tie local businesses to the prestige of the Bulldogs, reinforcing community bonds.
Beyond dollars, the program fosters youth development. Student‑athletes learn discipline, teamwork, and resilience—skills that translate into workforce readiness. For parents and educators, the balance between academics and athletics is a constant negotiation, but one that underscores the broader value of sports.
Opinion: The Columnist’s Perspective
As a senior columnist, I argue that high school football is undervalued as an economic driver. Folsom proves that sports can shape workforce pipelines, community identity, and local business ecosystems.
The contrarian view is clear: policymakers and business leaders should treat high school athletics as strategic investments. Ignoring programs like Folsom’s risks overlooking a vital engine of socioeconomic growth.
While Wall Street debates interest rates and GDP, the real story of resilience and identity is unfolding under Friday night lights.
Conclusion
Folsom High School football is not just about wins—it’s about shaping California’s economy and culture. From recruitment pipelines to local business surges, the Bulldogs embody the intersection of sport and society.
The lesson is simple: sports are a mirror of our priorities and potential. And in Folsom, that reflection is bright, bold, and instructive for the nation.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News4 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China5 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada5 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict5 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy4 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Democracy4 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital5 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
