News
Is the U.S.-India Partnership on Shaky Ground? Biden Declines New Delhi Invitation Amidst Foiled Assassination Plot
Table of Contents
Introduction
The U.S.-India partnership has been a cornerstone of American foreign policy in Asia, with both countries sharing common interests in economic, security, and diplomatic spheres. However, recent developments have raised questions about the future of this strategic relationship. U.S. President Joe Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to visit India has been interpreted by some as a sign of a rift between the two nations. Moreover, the discovery of a foiled assassination plot targeting a Sikh separatist in the United States, allegedly orchestrated by an Indian official, has further strained the relationship.
The implications of these events have been widely debated, with some suggesting that the U.S.-India partnership is on shaky ground. India’s government has downplayed the significance of the assassination plot, but the incident has raised concerns about India’s commitment to democratic values and human rights. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has raised the issue with Indian officials at the highest levels, indicating that the plot could have serious consequences for the bilateral relationship.

Key Takeaways
- Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to India has raised concerns about the future of the U.S.-India partnership.
- The foiled assassination plot targeting a Sikh separatist in the U.S. has strained the relationship and raised questions about India’s commitment to democratic values and human rights.
- The incident could have serious consequences for the bilateral relationship, a cornerstone of American foreign policy in Asia.
Context of U.S.-India Relations
The United States and India have had a complex relationship over the years. The two countries have had their fair share of ups and downs, but the relationship has been on an upward trajectory in recent years. The relationship has been strengthened by several factors, including shared economic interests, a common commitment to democracy, and a growing strategic partnership.
The U.S.-India relationship has been characterized by several key developments over the years. In the 1990s, the two countries began to build closer ties, driven by shared economic interests and a desire to counterbalance China’s growing influence in the region. This led to the signing of the U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Agreement in 2008, which was a major milestone in the relationship.
Since then, the relationship has continued to grow, with the two countries working together on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change. In 2021, President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed the importance of the Quad in supporting a free, open, inclusive, and resilient Indo-Pacific.
However, recent events have raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India relationship. In December 2023, an assassination plot targeting a Sikh leader was foiled by U.S. authorities. While the plot was not officially linked to the Indian government, it has raised concerns about the potential impact on the relationship. As a result, President Biden declined an invitation to visit New Delhi, and Modi’s government has judged that the incident won’t have serious consequences.
Despite these challenges, the U.S.-India relationship remains an important one, with significant implications for both countries and the broader region. As the two countries continue to navigate these challenges, it will be important to maintain open lines of communication and work together to address shared challenges.
Biden’s Declined Invitation: Implications and Analysis
President Biden’s recent decision to decline an invitation to visit New Delhi has raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India partnership. The invitation was extended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who hoped to strengthen ties between the two countries. However, Biden’s decision to decline the invitation has been interpreted by some as a sign that the partnership may be on shaky ground.
One factor that may have influenced Biden’s decision is the recent assassination plot against a Sikh leader in the United States, which was reportedly foiled by U.S. authorities. The plot is believed to have been orchestrated by individuals with links to the Indian government, which has caused tension between the two countries. Modi’s government has downplayed the incident, but some analysts believe that it may have contributed to Biden’s decision to decline the invitation.
Despite this setback, the U.S.-India partnership remains an important strategic relationship for both countries. The two countries have a shared interest in promoting regional stability and economic growth and have worked together on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change.
Moving forward, it will be important for both countries to continue to build on this partnership, even in the face of challenges. This may require a renewed commitment to dialogue and diplomacy, as well as a willingness to address difficult issues head-on. Ultimately, the success of the U.S.-India partnership will depend on the ability of both countries to work together in a constructive and collaborative manner.
Assassination Plot: Repercussions and India’s Stance
The recent assassination plot of a Sikh activist on U.S. soil has raised questions about the stability of the U.S.-India partnership. While U.S. authorities foiled the plot, Modi’s government has judged that it won’t have serious consequences.
According to an article in Foreign Policy, Biden’s decision to decline an invitation to New Delhi has been seen as a snub by some in India. However, the Modi government has downplayed the significance of this and has emphasized that the U.S.-India partnership is strong.
The Indian government has denied any involvement in the assassination plot and has stated that it is committed to maintaining a strong relationship with the United States. As reported by Reuters, the Indian government has taken steps to reassure the United States that it is committed to fighting terrorism and maintaining a strong partnership.
Despite this, the assassination plot has highlighted some of the challenges in the U.S.-India relationship. As reported by The New York Times, the plot has exposed the fragility of the U.S. ties with India. The article argues that the U.S. needs to be more cautious in its relationship with India and that it needs to be aware of the potential risks involved.
Overall, while the assassination plot has raised concerns about the U.S.-India partnership, both governments have emphasized that they are committed to maintaining a strong relationship. However, the incident has highlighted some of the challenges and risks involved in this relationship, and it remains to be seen how these will be addressed in the future.
Strategic Interests and Challenges
The U.S.-India partnership has been a cornerstone of the United States foreign policy in the Indo-Pacific region. Both countries have been working closely on a range of issues, including defence, trade, and climate change. However, recent events have raised questions about the future of this partnership.
One of the key challenges facing the U.S.-India partnership is the growing influence of China in the region. China’s aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea and its Belt and Road Initiative have raised concerns among U.S. policymakers. India, too, has been wary of China’s growing influence in the region. As a result, the U.S. and India have been working together to counter China’s influence.
Another challenge facing the U.S.-India partnership is the recent assassination plot that was foiled by U.S. intelligence agencies. The plot, which was allegedly masterminded by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), targeted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While the plot was foiled, it has raised questions about the security of the U.S.-India partnership. The fact that the U.S. was able to uncover the plot has led some in India to question whether the U.S. can be trusted as a reliable partner.
Despite these challenges, the U.S.-India partnership remains vital to both countries’ strategic interests. The two countries have a shared interest in promoting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. They also have a shared interest in countering terrorism, promoting economic growth, and addressing climate change. As such, the U.S.-India partnership will likely continue to grow and evolve in the coming years.
Economic Ties and Trade Agreements
The U.S.-India partnership has been regarded as one of the most important relationships in the world, with both countries being major economies and trading partners. In 2021, the two countries announced a partnership for global good, with a focus on building a strategic partnership and working together with regional groupings, including ASEAN and Quad [1].
Underscoring the close bilateral economic and trade relationship, the United States and India terminated six WTO disputes in June 2023, and India removed retaliatory tariffs on select U.S. products [2]. This move was seen as a significant step towards improving economic ties between the two countries.
In addition, the U.S. and India have been partnering on Open RAN field trials and rollouts, including scaled deployments, in both countries with operators and vendors of both markets, backed by U.S. and Indian government support [3]. This partnership is expected to enhance the development of 5G technology and strengthen trade relations between the two countries.
Despite these positive developments, the recent decline of President Biden’s invitation to visit New Delhi and the U.S.-foiled assassination plot have raised concerns about the stability of the U.S.-India partnership. However, it remains to be seen whether these events will have any significant impact on the economic ties and trade agreements between the two countries.
Defence and Security Cooperation
The United States and India have made significant progress in promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region. The two countries have been rapidly expanding their military cooperation, with a senior Defense Department official calling it a “transformational moment” in the U.S.-India defence partnership.
However, recent events have raised questions about the future of the U.S.-India partnership. President Biden declined an invitation to visit India, citing scheduling conflicts. Additionally, a U.S.-foiled assassination plot has strained relations between the two countries.
Despite these recent developments, the United States and India remain committed to promoting policies that facilitate greater technology sharing, co-development, and defence trade. The two countries have also been working to deepen their overall relationship, with a focus on defense and security cooperation.
The U.S.-India partnership is critical to promoting regional stability and security. As such, both countries need to continue to work together to address any challenges that may arise and to deepen their cooperation in defence and security matters.
Diplomatic Perspectives and Future Engagements
The recent decline of US President Joe Biden’s invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has raised questions about the future of the US-India partnership. The decision comes after the US foiled an assassination plot against Modi, which has been downplayed by the Indian government as having no serious consequences.
Despite the setback, both countries remain committed to strengthening their partnership. In a joint statement released in June 2023, the US and India pledged to deepen their cooperation in areas such as defence, trade, and climate change. The statement also reiterated their shared commitment to democratic values and the rule of law.
Moving forward, the US and India will need to navigate several challenges to maintain their partnership. One of the biggest obstacles is India’s growing ties with China, which has caused concern in Washington. The US has also been critical of India’s human rights record, particularly in the disputed region of Kashmir.
Conclusion
To address these issues, both countries will need to engage in frank and open dialogue. They will also need to work together to find common ground on issues of mutual concern. This could involve increased collaboration on regional security issues, such as counterterrorism and maritime security.
Overall, while the US-India partnership may face some challenges in the years ahead, both countries remain committed to deepening their cooperation. As they work to address their differences and build on their shared values, they will continue to play a critical role in shaping the future of the Indo-Pacific region.
Analysis
The 2026 Medicare Sticker Shock: Why Your COLA Raise Is Already Gone
The Social Security Administration delivered the news retirees desperately wanted to hear: a 2.8% 2026 Social Security COLA increase, designed to shield fixed incomes from persistent inflation. For the average retiree, that translates to roughly a $56 per month increase.
Sounds good, right? Don’t deposit that phantom raise just yet.
As a senior healthcare policy analyst, I can tell you that the accompanying announcement from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the silent thief in the night. The sharp increase in Medicare 2026 premiums is poised to claw back nearly one-third of the entire COLA, leaving millions of seniors with little more than a nominal net increase—and, for some, no increase at all.
The illusion of a raise is quickly yielding to the reality of the healthcare squeeze.
Table of Contents
The Brutal Math: How the Premium Hike Neutralizes the COLA
The key numbers that matter most to retirees on Original Medicare are staggering.
- Old Standard Part B Premium (2025): $185.00
- New Standard Medicare Part B premium 2026: $202.90
- The Difference: An increase of $17.90 per month.
Since the Part B premium is automatically deducted from your Social Security check, this is an immediate, inescapable reduction to your net income.
| Calculation | Monthly Increase | Impact |
| Gross COLA Increase (Avg.) | ~$56.00 | The headline raise. |
| Less: Part B Premium Hike | -$17.90 | The mandatory deduction. |
| Net Gain (Avg.) | ~$38.10 | What’s left for food, gas, and utilities. |
That $17.90 hike consumes approximately 32% of the average retiree’s raise, bringing the effective COLA down from 2.8% to around 2.1%. After a year of intense inflation hitting food, fuel, and housing, this marginal net gain offers almost no genuine retiree inflation protection. It is the largest erosion of the COLA by Medicare premiums since 2017.
The Hidden Costs You Must Also Face
Beyond the standard premium, two other numbers underscore the rising financial pressure:
- Medicare Part B deductible increase: This is rising from $257 to $283. This is the amount you must pay out-of-pocket annually before Part B coverage kicks in.
- Part A Inpatient Deductible: This is also rising to over $1,736 per benefit period. A single, unexpected hospitalization could now cost hundreds of dollars more than it did in 2025.
For those with smaller Social Security checks, the “hold harmless” provision will thankfully prevent your net benefit from decreasing. However, it also means your check essentially won’t grow at all, leaving you with zero net benefit from the COLA to battle rising consumer prices.
📈 The Wealth Penalty: IRMAA Brackets 2026
The squeeze is exponentially tighter for affluent and upper-middle-class retirees who are subject to the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA). This surcharge requires higher earners to pay a larger percentage of the Part B program cost.
The initial IRMAA trigger is now based on your 2024 tax filing.
- IRMAA Trigger 2026 (Single Filers): Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) > $109,000
- IRMAA Trigger 2026 (Joint Filers): MAGI > $218,000
The problem? Many retirees are only slightly above these thresholds, often due to a single, planned event like selling an appreciated asset or executing a small Roth conversion. Falling into that first IRMAA bracket can jump your total Part B monthly premium from $202.90 to $284.10 (and higher tiers escalate steeply from there), completely vaporizing the 2.8% COLA and potentially reducing your actual net monthly income.
Actionable Advice: Three Moves to Protect Your Income Now
The reality of these high Medicare deductible 2026 and premium costs demands a proactive financial stance. Here are three strategies to mitigate the damage:
1. Optimize Your Taxable Income (The IRMAA Strategy)
If you are close to an IRMAA threshold, work immediately with your tax advisor to manage your 2026 IRMAA brackets exposure.
- Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): If you are 70.5 or older, use QCDs from your IRA to satisfy your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD). This lowers your MAGI without generating taxable income.
- Roth Conversions: Strategically time any Roth conversions to stay under the IRMAA limit. A large conversion this year could cost you thousands in surcharges two years from now.
2. Review Your Part D and Medicare Advantage Options
Since this is Open Enrollment Season, don’t default to your old plan.
- Part D Surcharges: IRMAA also applies to Part D prescription drug coverage. Review your Part D plan’s premium and its coverage of your specific medications.
- Medicare Advantage: While not for everyone, many MA plans offer $0 Part B premiums and incorporate Part D coverage, offering a way to avoid the direct Part B premium hike—though you must weigh network restrictions and out-of-pocket limits.
3. File an IRMAA Appeal (The SSA-44)
Did a life-changing event (e.g., stopping work, reduction in work hours, divorce, death of a spouse) significantly reduce your income since 2024? If so, you can file a Form SSA-44 with Social Security to appeal the IRMAA determination based on your current reduced income, potentially lowering your premium tier immediately.
The 2.8% COLA was supposed to be a lifeline against inflation. For millions of American seniors, it will instead be a transfer payment to cover soaring healthcare costs. Planning now is the only way to ensure the net number on your Social Security check is maximized.
Analysis
The Odd Couple: Why the Trump-Mamdani “Bromance” is the Most Honest Thing in Politics Right Now
Let’s be honest: if you had “Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani bonding over utility bills” on your 2025 Bingo card, you’re lying.
But yesterday, the simulation didn’t just glitch; it completely reset.
On Friday, the Oval Office played host to a scene that would make a cable news pundit’s head explode. On one side, President Donald Trump, the avatar of right-wing populism. On the other hand, Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani, a card-carrying Democratic Socialist who campaigned on taxing the rich. By all laws of political physics, this should have been a cage match. It should have been fire and fury.
Instead? It was a bromance.
The Mamdani and Trump meeting wasn’t just cordial; it was arguably the most fascinating political theatre of the year. Watching them sit side-by-side, you didn’t see a clash of civilizations. You saw two guys from Queens who know exactly how to work a room, and who both seemingly hate the exact same people.
Table of Contents
The “Fascist” Pass
The moment that’s going to burn down social media isn’t the policy talk—it’s the joke.
When a reporter from the press pool—voice trembling with the anticipation of a “gotcha” moment—asked Mamdani if he still considered the President a “fascist,” the air left the room. It’s the kind of question designed to blow up a meeting.
But before Mamdani could answer, Trump interrupted. He didn’t rage. He didn’t tweet. He leaned over, patted the Mayor-Elect’s arm like a proud uncle, and dropped the line of the year:
“That’s okay. You can just say yes. It’s easier than explaining it. I don’t mind.”
This is the latest evolution of Trumpism. It’s a level of post-irony that renders the usual resistance attacks useless. By giving Mamdani a permission slip to use the “F-word” (fascism), Trump didn’t just defuse the insult; he owned it. He turned the ultimate condemnation into an inside joke between two guys who understand that labels don’t matter as much as leverage.
For Mamdani, it was a masterclass in pragmatism. He didn’t walk back his beliefs, but he didn’t take the bait. He laughed. And in that laugh, the “Resistance” died a little, and something else—something far more pragmatic—was born.
The Common Enemy: Con Edison
So, what do a billionaire real estate mogul and a socialist tenant organizer talk about when the cameras are off?
Con Edison.
If there is one thing that unites the penthouse and the tenement, it is the absolute hatred of a utility bill that makes no sense. This was the glue of the Trump Zohran summit.
Trump, ever the simplifier, argued that since global fuel prices are down, the rates in New York City must drop. “It’s ridiculous,” he said. Mamdani, who has made public power a central pillar of his platform, nodded vigorously. “Absolutely,” he replied.
This is the common ground that the establishment ignores at its peril. The Con Edison discussion highlights the “Horseshoe Theory” in action—the idea that the far-left and the far-right eventually curve around and meet. Both Trump and Mamdani appeal to voters who feel ripped off by faceless corporations and abandoned by the centrist status quo.
When Mamdani pointed out that “1 in 10” of his voters also pulled the lever for Trump, he wasn’t apologizing; he was stating a fact that Democratic consultants in D.C. are too terrified to admit. The working class doesn’t care about the ideological labels; they care that their lights stay on without bankrupting them.
Queens Recognizes Queens
Perhaps the most surreal moment came when Trump defended Mamdani against his own party. Rep. Elise Stefanik had previously thrown the kitchen sink at Mamdani, labeling him a “Jihadist.”
In a normal timeline, Trump joins the pile-on. But yesterday? He dismissed his loyalist’s attack with a wave of his hand, calling Mamdani a “rational person” and adding, “The better he does, the happier I am.”
Why? Because Stefanik is Washington. Trump and Mamdani are New York. Specifically, they are creatures of the outer boroughs.
There is a specific frequency that New Yorkers operate on—a mix of hustle, bluntness, and a complete lack of patience for decorum. The Zohran Mamdani White House meeting proved that geography is often thicker than ideology. Trump looks at Mamdani and doesn’t see a socialist threat; he sees a guy who won against the odds, a guy who knows how to fight, and a guy who isn’t boring.
The New Face of Populism?
We are witnessing a realignment. The Trump-Mamdani meeting headline isn’t just a fluke; it’s a preview.
We have entered an era where cultural warring takes a backseat to the raw exercise of power against perceived elites. Suppose the new face of populism involves a MAGA president and a socialist mayor teaming up to bully a utility company into lowering rates. In that case, the centrist middle is in big trouble.
The traffic swarm on social media will obsess over the “fascism” joke. Still, the real story is boring, practical, and terrifying for the establishment: Trump and Mamdani agree on more than you think.
And as Trump said, he doesn’t mind if you call him names, as long as you can cut a deal. Welcome to the new New York.
Opinion
The Texans Defense Just Put the AFC on Notice—With or Without Stroud
Josh Allen didn’t just lose a football game on Thursday night; he survived a mugging.
If you watched the Texans vs Bills highlights, you didn’t see a shootout. You saw a statement. You saw a Houston defensive front that smelled blood in the water and a secondary that refused to break. By the time the clock hit zero at NRG Stadium, with the scoreboard reading Texans 23, Bills 19, one thing became violently clear: The Houston Texans are no longer just “C.J. Stroud’s team.”
They are a defensive juggernaut capable of wrecking the AFC playoff picture, regardless of who is under center.
Table of Contents
The “Bullock Breakout” and the Pass Rush Party
Let’s start with the metric that matters most: 8 sacks.
That is not a typo. The Texans’ defensive front, led by the relentless Will Anderson Jr. (who tallied 2.5 sacks and seemingly lived in the Bills’ backfield), turned one of the league’s best quarterbacks into a frantic escape artist. Anderson has now recorded a sack in six straight games, tying a franchise record held by Mario Williams. He isn’t just rushing the passer; he is wrecking game plans.
But the true story of Thursday night was rookie safety Calen Bullock.
- 3 Total Turnovers Forced: Two interceptions and a forced fumble.
- The “Closer”: His interception with 24 seconds left didn’t just pad the stats; it iced the game.
In a league obsessed with offense, DeMeco Ryans has built a unit that wins ugly. When the Bills threatened late, it wasn’t the offense that responded—it was the defense forcing a 4th-and-27 disaster for Buffalo. This is the brand of football that travels well in January.
Davis Mills Did “Just Enough” (And That’s the Point)
Let’s address the elephant in the room: C.J. Stroud was out.
When your franchise quarterback is sidelined with a concussion, the playbook usually shrinks to the size of a napkin. Enter Davis Mills. The backup signal-caller didn’t light up the box score (153 yards, 2 TDs), but he did something far more important: he didn’t lose the game.
- Zero Turnovers: Mills protected the football.
- Red Zone Efficiency: Two first-half touchdown passes gave the defense a lead they could defend.
The “Mills Narrative” isn’t about him being a saviour. It’s about the Texans proving they have the infrastructure to survive adversity. Good teams panic when their star goes down. Great teams lean on their other units. Thursday night proved that Houston is becoming the latter.
The AFC South & Playoff Picture
So, where does this leave the Texans?
At 6-5, they are back above .500 and have firmly re-inserted themselves into the NFL playoff picture AFC. This wasn’t just a win; it was a tiebreaker goldmine against a fellow AFC contender.
With the Jaguars and Colts also fighting for the AFC South crown, this win stabilises the ship. If Stroud returns healthy for the stretch run—paired with this version of the defence—Houston is a dark horse to make a deep run. They just proved they can beat a 7-win Bills team without their best player. Imagine what they can do when he returns.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When will C.J. Stroud return?
C.J. Stroud is currently in the NFL concussion protocol. While there is no official timeline, most players typically miss one week. If he clears protocol, he could return for the Week 13 matchup against the Jaguars.
Are the Texans playoff contenders?
Absolutely. At 6-5 with a tiebreaker win over Buffalo, the Texans are firmly in the Wild Card hunt and still competing for the AFC South title. Their defence (ranking top-5 in sacks) makes them a dangerous matchup for any team.
Who is Calen Bullock?
Calen Bullock is the Texans’ rookie safety out of USC. He was a third-round draft pick in 2024 and has quickly become a playmaker, recording multiple interceptions in his debut season, including the game-sealer against the Bills.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News4 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China4 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada4 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict4 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy4 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Democracy4 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital5 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
