Connect with us

Economy

The Ukraine War’s economic consequences for developing countries

Published

on

Developing countries in general, and especially those which are net importers of oil are in a real fix as to how to manage macroeconomic challenges like high inflation, balance of payments concerns, and debt sustainability, on one hand, and on the other make needed development expenditures, especially in the health  sector, along with providing enough stimulus, and subsidy to support people in the lower income echelons, which are many and most likely quite rapidly rising in numbers over the pandemic.- Advertisement –

War in Ukraine has made all this all the more difficult, and as Jayati Ghosh rightly pointed, requires a significant amount of support from both rich, advanced countries, and multilateral institutions. Yet this support in any significant way, has remained mostly eluded over the many months during the pandemic. On top of that, oil prices which took a nose-dive and settled to around $20 a barrel in around the later part of April 2020, saw a fast-paced rise in the later part of the same year, due to demand improvement, but sadly also significantly at the back of artificially reduced supply.

Resultantly, oil prices had already risen to above $90 a barrel before the war began, and have now seen reaching around $130 a barrel. Imagine the precarious situation in which developing countries find themselves. For how long they can manage pressures on fiscal balance on account of providing subsidies, and on the balance of payments on account of higher import costs?

Pakistan imported around 80-90 percent of its total wheat imports from Russia and Ukraine in 2020, and therefore a war has meant that the country is likely to face longer timelines, and higher prices with regard to wheat that needs to be imported.

And cutting development expenditures would mean a negative impact on growth recovery, and overall fall into stagflationary consequences. The war will likely exacerbate these pressures on macroeconomic accounts, with consequences of such rise in commodity prices already producing ripples in the political domains of developing countries in general; a repeat of similar consequences seen as the commodity prices increased as an outcome of the Global Financial Crisis of late 2000s.

ALSO READ :  Unveiling the Megacities: A Comprehensive Look at the World's Urban Giants

Criticising this rather self-centred approach by OPEC+ group of countries, a recent Financial Times (FT) quoted the head of International Energy Agency (IEA) in an article ‘IEA ready to release more oil to ease soaring energy prices, says chief’ recently as follows: ‘The head of the International Energy Agency said the group’s members were ready to release more oil from emergency stockpiles to ease soaring energy prices, as he criticised Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for refusing to pump more crude.

Fatih Birol said the co-ordinated release last week by the US and other big energy-consuming nations of 60mn barrels was an “initial response” and that the IEA was ready to do “everything” to reduce the volatility in energy markets driven by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.’

A global commodity supply shock had already sky-rocketed food prices, and the war will only add to it, for instance in terms of essential natured commodities like wheat and fertilizer. The same article by Jayati Ghosh pointed out in this regard ‘Before the war, Ukraine was the world’s fifth-largest wheat exporter, and also a major exporter of barley, corn, rapeseed, and sunflower oil.

The prices of these commodities in global trade have risen significantly, adding to recent increases in crop prices generally. …Crop production in developing countries could also be hit by fertilizer shortages. Russia, the world’s largest wheat exporter, is also a major fertilizer producer, and disruptions to these exports will push global food prices even higher.’

Highlighting the rising level of commodity prices, a March 3 FT published article ‘Commodity prices soar to highest level since 2008 over Russia supply fear’ indicated ‘The S&P GSCI index, a broad barometer for the price of global raw materials, has jumped 16 per cent this week, leaving it on track for the sharpest rise on records dating back to 1970, according to Refinitiv data.

ALSO READ :  Finance Secretary chairs the meeting of National Price Monitoring Committee (NPMC)

It is now at its highest level since 2008. US oil prices also hit the highest level since 2008 on Thursday. Wheat futures in Chicago shot above $12 a bushel. Other commodities including aluminium and coal have also soared this week, in a move that will have profound effects on global businesses and consumers.’- Advertisement –

Similarly, another FT article ‘Food crisis looms as Ukrainian wheat shipments grind to halt’ pointed out with regard to rising food prices that ‘Russia and Ukraine supply almost a third of the world’s wheat exports and since the Russian assault on its neighbour, ports on the Black Sea have come to a virtual standstill.

As a result, wheat prices have soared to record highs, overtaking levels seen during the food crisis of 2007-08. …The surge in prices will fuel soaring food inflation – already at a seven-year high of 7.8 per cent in January – and the biggest impact will be on the food security of poorer grain importers, warned analysts and food aid organisations.

’ As per the same article, Pakistan imported around 80-90 percent of its total wheat imports from Russia and Ukraine in 2020, and therefore a war has meant that the country is likely to face longer timelines, and higher prices with regard to wheat that needs to be imported.

Courtesy : PT


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Analysis

Pennsylvania’s Economy at a Crossroads: Why Local Signals from WNEP Matter Nationally

Published

on

Our Editorial Chief and senior columnist’s opinion on how regional shifts in PA reflect the broader U.S. economy.

Introduction

The U.S. economy is often measured in sweeping national statistics—GDP growth, inflation rates, and interest‑rate decisions. Yet the real pulse of America’s financial health beats in its local communities. Pennsylvania, with its diverse industries and working‑class backbone, offers a telling microcosm of national trends. And through outlets like WNEP, local anxieties and aspirations are broadcast daily, shaping how residents—and by extension, the nation—interpret the state of the economy.

Macro Context: The National Economy Meets Local Reality

At the national level, policymakers are grappling with inflationary pressures, uneven job growth, and questions about consumer confidence. Wall Street analysts debate whether the U.S. economy is heading for a soft landing or a prolonged slowdown. But in Pennsylvania (PA), these abstract debates translate into tangible realities: factory shifts, small business closures, and household budgets stretched thin.

Pennsylvania’s economy has long been a bellwether. Its manufacturing hubs, energy corridors, and healthcare networks mirror the broader U.S. industrial mix. When the state’s job market tightens or consumer spending dips, it often foreshadows national patterns.

Regional Insights: WNEP and the Pennsylvania Lens

Local news outlets like WNEP play a critical role in contextualising these shifts. Coverage of rising grocery prices, layoffs in regional plants, or new infrastructure projects provides a ground‑level view of the economy that national headlines often miss.

  • Manufacturing: Once the backbone of PA’s economy, it now faces global competition and automation challenges.
  • Healthcare: A growing sector, yet burdened by staffing shortages and rising costs.
  • Logistics & Energy: Pennsylvania’s geographic position makes it a hub for distribution and energy production, sectors that are sensitive to national policy shifts.
ALSO READ :  China's Industrial Profits Set to Rebound in 2024 with Up to 11% Increase Due to Improved US Export Outlook

By reporting on these industries, WNEP not only informs residents but also contributes to the national narrative.

Business & Consumer Implications

For small businesses in PA, the economy is not an abstract concept—it’s survival. Rising interest rates make borrowing harder, while inflation erodes margins. Consumers, meanwhile, adjust by cutting discretionary spending, delaying home purchases, or seeking additional income streams.

This dynamic reflects a broader truth: the health of the U.S. economy is inextricably linked to the resilience of its local communities. Pennsylvania’s struggles and successes are America’s struggles and successes.

Opinion: The Columnist’s Perspective

As a senior columnist, I argue that local economies are the real pulse of national health. Wall Street optimism often overlooks Main Street realities. Ignoring signals from places like Pennsylvania risks misreading the bigger picture.

Consider this: while national GDP may show growth, if households in Scranton or Harrisburg are tightening belts, the sustainability of that growth is questionable. WNEP’s coverage of local hardships—job losses, rising costs, community resilience—offers insights that policymakers and investors cannot afford to ignore.

The contrarian view here is simple: the economy’s future may be written in Pennsylvania.

Conclusion

Pennsylvania’s economy is not just regional—it is predictive. From manufacturing floors to local newsrooms, the signals emanating from PA offer a window into America’s trajectory. Policymakers, investors, and readers alike must pay attention to these local cues.

As WNEP continues to spotlight the lived realities of Pennsylvanians, the rest of the nation would do well to listen.

Continue Reading

Biography

The Steel and Silk: Why Sanae Takaichi is the LDP’s Only True Challenger to the Status Quo

Published

on

The election of Sanae Takaichi as Japan’s first female prime minister is often framed as a symbolic gender breakthrough. That is a distraction. The real story isn’t her gender; it is her unapologetic, hardline conservative ideology that marks her as the single greatest threat to the LDP’s decades-long pattern of cautious, incremental change. As a protégé of the late Shinzo Abe, Takaichi is not merely maintaining his legacy; she is positioned to accelerate it, using a political momentum that few outside the core conservative base truly appreciate.

Her rise signals a defiant pivot toward a deeply nationalistic, robustly defended, and economically secure Japan—a vision that, if fully executed, would fundamentally reshape domestic policy and regional diplomacy.

The “Three Pillars” of Takaichi’s Policy: Assertion, Security, and Pragmatism

Unlike her more moderate predecessors, Sanae Takaichi operates from a platform built on three distinct, high-impact policy pillars that resonate powerfully with the party’s core conservative and nationalist wing.

1. The Revived “Sanae-nomics” and Economic Security

Takaichi is a staunch advocate for aggressive public spending and monetary easing, echoing Abe’s economic formula. But her unique addition is the heavy focus on economic security. Having served as the first Minister of Economic Security, she prioritises strengthening domestic supply chains (especially in semiconductors and critical minerals), protecting technology from foreign leakage, and establishing measures to counter techno-economic risks. This is not just about growth; it’s about national resilience. She sees government spending as a strategic tool for “crisis-management investment”, challenging the traditional conservative aversion to large debt.

ALSO READ :  🎯 Babar Azam Century Drought ENDS: Maestro Equals Saeed Anwar’s Pakistan ODI Record

2. Accelerated Defense and Constitutional Reform

The core of her political identity is an assertive defence posture. Sanae Takaichi has wasted no time in signaling an acceleration of plans to bring defence spending to 2% of GDP, far ahead of previous targets. This is paired with an intent to revise the three core security documents (National Security Strategy, etc.) and a desire to formally establish Japan’s Self-Defence Forces as a national military by revising the pacifist Article 9 of the Constitution. The departure of the restraining influence of the Komeito party from the coalition has cleared the path for a much more proactive foreign and security policy, aligning perfectly with the hawkish stance of the Japan Innovation Party (Ishin), her new coalition partner.

3. Cultural and Social Conservatism

On social matters, Takaichi maintains a firm traditionalist line. She has consistently opposed reforms such as allowing married couples to use separate surnames and is against same-sex marriage. She has also taken a hard-line stance on immigration, calling for tighter visa regulations and a crackdown on illegal migrants. While criticised by liberals, this position strongly appeals to conservative voters who felt abandoned by the LDP in recent elections, aligning with a global trend of cultural conservatism.

The Media Narrative vs. The Ground Truth

Internationally, Sanae Takaichi is often reduced to a simple caricature: a “China hawk” and a historical revisionist due to her regular visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine. While these facts are undeniable, they overshadow the ground truth of her political strength: she is the champion of the LDP’s rank-and-file general membership.

In the LDP leadership race, she consistently secured the most votes from party members around the country. This popularity is significant because it speaks to a deep yearning within the conservative base for a leader who is unreservedly patriotic and willing to push back against foreign and domestic pressures for change. Her victory wasn’t merely a factional deal; it was a powerful expression of the popular will within the conservative heart of the LDP. The party’s decision to rally behind her was, in part, a survival strategy to stem the flow of conservative voters to nascent right-wing parties like Sanseito.

ALSO READ :  SadaPay to launch e-money services in Pakistan after Green Signal from SBP

What a “Takaichi Era” Means for Global Powers

The premiership of Sanae Takaichi immediately signals a new phase in Japan’s major diplomatic relationships, particularly with the United States.

Her ideology is arguably better aligned with a potential future US administration that favours nationalism and “America First” policies. Takaichi’s emphasis on a strong, independent Japanese military and her firm stance on economic security and China are seen as appealing to the more transactional, less interventionist wing of American politics. Her early overtures, including gestures of personal affinity and a commitment to strengthening critical mineral supply chains, underscore her pragmatic approach to maintaining the core Japan-US alliance while asserting Japan’s national interests.

However, her hardline approach on Taiwan—breaking with diplomatic tradition by stating a China attack on the island could result in a Japanese military response—has already drawn sharp rebukes from Beijing, leading to increased tensions in the East China Sea. Her tenure is set to redefine Japan’s role, shifting it from a quiet, pacifist partner to an assertive, autonomous actor on the world stage, prioritising national interest with a Margaret Thatcher-like fortitude.

Conclusion: The Defining Choice for Japan

Sanae Takaichi is not a figure who offers compromise. She offers conviction. Her success in leading a minority government will not be defined by legislative consensus but by her ability to generate public support for her bold, conservative vision. Her premiership will be a test of whether Japan’s public is truly ready to sacrifice post-war pacifist and economic norms for a newly assertive national identity.

Do you believe Sanae Takaichi is the future of the LDP, capable of navigating this complex political environment and securing a stable governing majority? Share your perspective on her policy direction.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Economy

📉 UK Economy Unexpectedly Contracted by 0.1% in September: A Canary in the Coal Mine?

Published

on

close up photo of monitor

The announcement that the UK economy unexpectedly contracted by 0.1% in September 2025 indicates more than just a minor statistical blip. It is a significant signal of underlying fragility within the nation’s economic landscape. While the overall third-quarter GDP growth of a modest 0.1% shielded the country from an immediate technical recession, the monthly September economic decline in the UK paints a much gloomier picture, raising serious questions about the sustainability of the recent, albeit sluggish, recovery.1 For finance and economics readers, this figure demands a deep dive beyond the headline.

The Significance of the Contraction

A monthly contraction has occurred. This follows a revised flat August and an unadvised fall in July. These are clear signs that the UK economic growth 2025 trajectory is losing steam.2 This is particularly worrying as the UK had been one of the fastest-growing G7 economies earlier in the year.3

The significance lies in the momentum—or lack thereof. Liz McKeown, ONS Director of Economic Statistics, commented that growth slowed further in the third quarter of the year. Both services and construction were weaker than in the previous period.4 There is a fear that the economy is struggling to gain solid traction. This suggests that the recent modest expansion was built on shaky foundations. As we head into the traditionally busy end-of-year period, the nation is potentially vulnerable to further shocks.5

Analyzing the Causes Behind the Unexpected Decline

The primary culprit for the sharp monthly drop in September was unequivocally the production sector, which fell by a stark 2.0%.6 Within this, the manufacturing of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers experienced a monumental 28.6% decline.7

  • The Cyber-Attack Shock: Experts attribute a substantial portion of this manufacturing collapse to the crippling cyber-attack on Jaguar Land Rover (JLR). This cyber-attack forced a prolonged shutdown of production lines.8 The ONS highlighted that this one event contributed a negative 9$0.17$ percentage point drag to the monthly GDP figure.10 This highlights a modern, non-traditional threat to economic stability.
  • Wider Manufacturing Weakness: While the JLR incident was the most dramatic factor, the production sector weakness was broader.11 The ONS reported a fall in all production subsectors, indicating that broader global headwinds and subdued demand for manufactured products are also weighing heavily.12
  • Consumer Caution and Uncertainty: While the services sector managed a slight 0.2% growth in September, overall consumer-facing services fell in the third quarter. High inflation (at 3.8% in September 2025) coupled with political and fiscal uncertainty ahead of the Chancellor’s Autumn Budget likely led to increased caution, with households opting to save more rather than spend.13 This is a crucial factor holding back a broad-based recovery.
ALSO READ :  Fidelity National Financial Hacked: Real Estate Industry in Chaos

Short-Term and Long-Term Impacts

The UK economy contraction in September will have immediate and lasting consequences for key economic players.

1. Businesses

Short-Term: Manufacturers, especially those in the automotive supply chain, face immediate revenue hits. They urgently need to bolster their digital resilience against cyber threats.14 Business confidence is likely to be fragile. Persistent rumours of potential tax hikes in the upcoming Budget could further complicate the situation. These rumours may stifle investment plans.15

Long-Term: The fall in business investment, down 0.3% in Q3, is a major concern. Without sustained private sector investment, the UK’s long-term productivity puzzle will remain unsolved. This puzzle is characterized by stubbornly low growth in output per hour. It will cap the potential for stronger, non-inflationary UK economic growth in 2025 and beyond.

2. Consumers

Short-Term: The simultaneous rise in the unemployment rate to 5% coupled with the weak growth figures confirms a softening labour market.17 This combination of anaemic growth and rising joblessness will undoubtedly dampen wage expectations and consumer confidence, leading to further saving rather than spending.

Long-Term: Stagnant growth and low productivity translate directly into a continuation of the living standards squeeze. This reinforces a trend of real GDP per head growth. The growth is far too weak to deliver meaningful improvements for the average household.

3. Government Policy

The weak data significantly increases the pressure on the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).18 Given the figures, and the narrow 5-4 vote to hold rates at 4.0% in November, expectations for a December rate cut have substantially increased. Markets are now pricing in a reduction to 19$3.75\%$. This is seen as a measure to stimulate activity.20

ALSO READ :  NATO’S Space Policy Ups the Stakes?

For the Chancellor, the figures pose a dilemma:

  • Fiscal Tightening: To meet fiscal targets, the Chancellor is expected to announce a large package. This will involve fiscal tightening such as tax rises or spending cuts.21
  • Growth Trade-Off: However, a significant fiscal contraction could “slam the brakes on the economy.” This makes the already difficult goal of achieving sustainable growth even harder. The UK financial outlook is precarious, and any policy misstep could easily tip the economy into a recession.

Conclusion and Call to Action

The 0.1% UK economy contraction in September is a stark reminder that the journey to robust economic health is far from over. Stripping away the single-event shock of the cyber-attack, the underlying picture remains one of a sluggish economy struggling with low productivity, cautious consumer spending, and the chilling effect of policy uncertainty.

The immediate focus must be on bolstering business confidence—not undermining it with unexpected tax burdens—and strategically targeting investment that addresses long-term structural issues. The upcoming Budget must be a pivotal moment, offering a clear and consistent long-term plan rather than short-sighted measures designed merely to balance the books. The UK financial outlook hinges on whether policymakers view this data as a temporary blip or a critical warning sign that requires a fundamental change in growth strategy.

Will the government seize this moment to outline a bold vision for the future, or will we continue to drift into an era of low growth and rising uncertainty? The answer will define the rest of UK economic growth 2025 and well beyond.


Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2019-2025 ,The Monitor . All Rights Reserved .

Discover more from The Monitor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading