Development
The Importance of Leadership Skills to bring Change in Organization
Introduction: The leadership is the key to succeed in the competition of the co organizations. The leadership gives you the possibility to go ahead with the right direction with ease. The leader also drives the vehicle of Organization and makes it reach its destination.
In several Organization where is there is the dearth of good leadership they always fail in the long run and cannot make their way through a difficult time. The Leader never thinks about his gratitude or reward of what he does for the betterment and strength of the organization and always brings changes in the Organizational setup and rules and regulations.
But the best Leaders are always those who first of all pursue and motivate the Staff when they are ready to accept the change, the Leader starts making changes so as to avoid rebellion in the Organization. If we take the example of the educational institution, it is very hard and difficult to bring some immediate changes. Because the Institution has relations with Community, students and Teaches as well .
The change in the rules and policies may affect the Educational standards or the Students including their parents . So to bring the changes, all of them should be taken into confidence and motivated to accept the challenge. If any of them is unwilling to accept the challenge, then there is possibility of clash which may result dangerous for the organization , students or parents or the community at large .
The good leader can solve the problems in few moments but leadership lacking will result collapse of the organization in terms development. Communication is the best tool for the leadership as the leader uses the words in decent style to attract the listener. The Listener makes a positive impression about the Leader .
Table of Contents
Functions of Leadership
Leaders are the decision-makers so they are free to take the decision. But first of all, they must consult with the team and then impose the decision . But there are some points which are no liable to be consulted with staff . They are the principles set by the organization and governing the code of conduct.
The most important quality of the Leadership is to asses the performance of the Organization and Reputation among the public . If the organization is an educational Institute , then it must sustain its standard and provide quality education along with talented scholars.The leadership functions also contains an alignment of organizational practices with values and Vision .
This mean that the Organization must follow values and the Vision .The Leader can alter Organizational practices and standards so as to make them suitable for the people to adapt and avail. He takes initiative for the improvement of the intuition and its products. He also facilitates s the quality interactions among the staff as well as the general public or consumers.
IMPACTING AND INFLUENCING TO BRING CHANGE:
The abilities which are the core issues of the leadership having capacities that enable powerful strategies to become actualized. These capacities include people, processes, supports, models, techniques, structures, plans, frameworks and other inputs needed to enact, bring to scale and sustain powerful change. Some examples of core capacities follow:
- · Collective vision and results framework
- · Governance structure
- · Group processes such as governance, decision making, problem-solving and conflict resolution
- · Resident leadership and authentic civic demand
- · Strategic use of data
- · Effective partnerships among residents, institutions and others
- · Support for collaborative learning and accountability to results
- · Communication plan and structure
- If a person wants to achieve impact; influence and leverage outcomes he must pursue others to accept the change. A good example is the influence outcome of changing community norms on tolerating crime in the neighbourhood.
Certain core capacities are vital to effecting this norm change, such as engaged resident leadership; the collective vision for results; effective partnerships among residents, institutions and others; and capacity to communicate core messages, ideas and beliefs. As these building blocks of change are brought into play, neighbours may change their views on accepting the level of crime and become motivated to mobilize for action.
For instance, flyers for block watch (based on a communication strategy) may be distributed in schools, stores, faith organizations and neighbourhoods (effective partnerships among residents, institutions and others) based on the action plan of an engaged neighbourhood group (resident leadership).
The block watch activity may further mobilize residents, sparking them to forge new types of partnerships with law enforcement agencies. These shifts in behaviour, partnerships and law enforcement strategies illustrate influence, the result of core capacities leading to strong building blocks of change.
If the changes in neighbourhood mobilization and law enforcement strategies lead to a decline in the crime rate, the core capacities have achieved an impact outcome. If the new strategies are replicated in other neighbourhoods throughout the city, the strategies will be brought to scale. Further, the engaged residents will remain in place to address other neighbourhood issues.
Implementation of Change and Effects
As it has already been discussed that the Change can be implemented when the staff or the team members of any organization are ready to accept and adapt the change without the Resistance. If there is any type if resistance then it becomes agitated and cause s the differences in the Organization. To implement change first of the team members or the staff should be apprised and motivated.
Secondly, the staff should be informed about the advantages of the new change and its effect on Organizational functioning. Suppose that if the organization where the change is being made in the policies by the leader is Us Military, then first of all the Leader will take all the soldiers into confidence in order to escape the rebellion or resistance which may affect upon the discipline of the force and result in danger.
Change cannot be implemented in any organization until all of the staff or team accept it heartedly and act according to the change. No body is the born Leader but it is skill and Competency which is got by the certain person to rule and administer the staff and implement the change in such a way that it may not cause dispute.
Preparing for the change and Reducing Negative effects
To reduce the negative effects of change, it necessary to go by the principles set by the Leader and implemented after the due consultation with staff employed in a certain Organization. The first thing is to mobilize the staff and bring the change gradually that will have less effect then the change which come to effect at one.
The immediate change may affect organizational functioning and reputation as well. The gradual change can be applied in any Organization which will come in effect in parts and it proves less negative. The team should be apprised for the change and safety measures should be taken in advance in order to meet the negative effects at their early stages.
The Military is such organization which is so sensitive and the leaders think twice even thrice to bring changes in commands and policies because such p [policies have far-reaching effects and may engulf the others when there is resistance or revolt among the soldiers. They should pursue to avoid frustration among the team members.
Motivational Initiative
The leader is the key player in decision-making and when it comes to reforms or changes in the organization. The Leader has got some extraordinary qualities to face the problems occurring from time to time in the wake of policymaking and change-making in the methods, policies and rules. Those changes are usually acceptable for some persons because there are also some troubles makers stop to resist the Changes and stop working until their demands are fulfilled.
The leader is responsible to govern the organizations set up and day-to-day working. As the leadership competency cannot be learned for only having some training sessions but it demands skills such as administrative, communicative and motivational which are the real prerequisites for the good leader. According to the Psychologists that every child passes through the series of mental development and at last starts thinking about the things and distinguishes between them.
If take the group into consideration that if all people claim to be the leaders, they will not succeed in their mission because every person will do their own and try to excel one another. Instead, if there is a leader of the group and the group accepts his decision then their mission can be successful.
Conclusion
Finally, Social change is the main component and can be influenced with suitable alternatives. , the leaderships the backbone for the of development and structure of any organization. The Company can move on provided that it has been run by able and skilled leadership. If the Leadership is not supportive, it abruptly effects upon the organizational performance and reputation.
Leaders are needed in all circumstances even for the more routines tasks to help run the company smoothly. If we take the example of the Family the Leadership Function is considered as the basis of the parents. Because we are the team members and our parents has to decide about us. Similarly, the boss drives the members and the Leader teaches them to acquire competency.
Finally, the leader is necessary to guide and make decisions for the improvement and development of the Organization. He can bring changes but he must inform the team members about that in advance.
The Organization such as Army needs discipline so that the orders may be carried out.
If the leader imposes the decision they have to accept them but there will be many who do not want to comply with it. So in this regard pre-information is the key [point in order to bring change; be it personal, Organizational or Institutional.
Analysis
Biden Boosts Pacific Diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. Engagement in the Indo-Pacific
Table of Contents
Introduction
In an era marked by shifting global power dynamics, economic interdependence, and regional security challenges, the United States under the leadership of President Joe Biden has placed a renewed emphasis on its engagement in the Indo-Pacific region. The Indo-Pacific has emerged as a geopolitical epicentre, where economic vitality, strategic interests, and diplomatic endeavours converge. President Biden’s commitment to boosting Pacific diplomacy underscores a strategic shift aimed at reinforcing America’s presence, fostering regional stability, and building enduring partnerships.
This blog post delves into the multifaceted aspects of President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy strategy, examining its objectives, key initiatives, and implications for the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific. As we explore the dynamics of this critical region, we will see how President Biden’s approach seeks to address complex challenges while capitalizing on the vast opportunities presented by the Indo-Pacific.
Understanding the Indo-Pacific
Before delving into President Biden’s initiatives, it is imperative to comprehend the significance of the Indo-Pacific region. Stretching from the eastern shores of Africa to the western coast of the Americas, the Indo-Pacific encompasses a vast expanse of land and sea, home to over half the world’s population and accounting for a significant share of global economic output. It is a region of immense strategic importance, characterized by diverse cultures, economies, and geopolitical interests.
The Indo-Pacific hosts major global players, including China, India, Japan, and Australia, each with its own vision for the region’s future. China’s rapid economic rise, military modernization, and assertive behaviour in the South China Sea have sparked concerns among its neighbours and the broader international community. India’s burgeoning economy and growing influence further add to the region’s complexity.
The United States has long maintained a security presence in the Indo-Pacific through its alliances and partnerships, notably with Japan, South Korea, and Australia. However, in recent years, concerns arose about the sustainability of this commitment, prompting a reassessment of U.S. priorities in the region.
President Biden’s Pacific Diplomacy: Objectives and Initiatives
President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy strategy is rooted in a clear set of objectives aimed at promoting a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific. These objectives can be summarized as follows:
- Strengthening Alliances and Partnerships: The cornerstone of President Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy is the reinforcement of existing alliances, such as the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the cultivation of new partnerships. The Quad, a strategic forum comprising the United States, Japan, India, and Australia, has gained prominence as a mechanism for enhancing cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.
- Countering China’s Assertiveness: While the Biden administration has emphasized competition with China across various domains, it also seeks areas of cooperation, such as climate change and global health. The administration’s approach balances competition with engagement, recognizing that competition does not preclude cooperation.
- Economic Engagement: Recognizing the economic significance of the Indo-Pacific, President Biden has underscored the importance of trade and investment in the region. His administration has explored opportunities for economic partnerships and infrastructure development, such as the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative.
- Promoting Democracy and Human Rights: Upholding democratic values and human rights is integral to President Biden’s foreign policy approach. In the Indo-Pacific, this translates into support for democratic institutions, civil society, and the rule of law.
- Addressing Climate Change and Environmental Challenges: Climate change poses a significant threat to the Indo-Pacific, with rising sea levels and extreme weather events affecting many countries in the region. President Biden’s commitment to addressing climate change aligns with the region’s urgent need for environmental resilience.
Key Initiatives and Partnerships
- The Quad: The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or Quad, has emerged as a critical platform for security and strategic cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. President Biden has reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to the Quad, which includes regular meetings among the leaders of the United States, Japan, India, and Australia. The Quad’s agenda covers a wide range of issues, including maritime security, cybersecurity, infrastructure development, and vaccine distribution.
- AUKUS: The Australia, UK, and US (AUKUS) security partnership has garnered significant attention for its focus on enhancing defence capabilities and technology sharing. AUKUS aims to bolster Australia’s naval capabilities, particularly through the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. This initiative signals a deeper commitment to regional security in the Indo-Pacific.
- ASEAN Engagement: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) plays a central role in regional diplomacy. President Biden has actively engaged with ASEAN member states to strengthen ties and address common challenges. The United States is also working to advance the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, which emphasizes ASEAN centrality and principles of inclusivity and transparency.
- Infrastructure Investment: The Indo-Pacific is in dire need of infrastructure development to support economic growth and connectivity. President Biden’s administration has introduced the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative, aimed at mobilizing private sector investment in areas such as climate-resilient infrastructure, digital technology, and health security. This initiative complements China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and offers an alternative approach to infrastructure development.
- Climate Change Mitigation: Recognizing the existential threat posed by climate change, President Biden has prioritized climate action as a cornerstone of his foreign policy. The United States has engaged with Indo-Pacific nations to promote clean energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance climate resilience in the region.
Implications and Challenges
President Biden’s emphasis on boosting Pacific diplomacy carries profound implications for the United States, its allies, and the broader Indo-Pacific region. Some of the key implications and challenges include:
- Balancing Competition and Cooperation: Striking the right balance between competition and cooperation with China is a delicate task. While competition in the Indo-Pacific is inevitable, the United States and its allies must identify areas of common interest where cooperation is possible.
- Enhancing Regional Stability: The Indo-Pacific faces numerous security challenges, including territorial disputes, North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, and the rise of non-state actors. President Biden’s strategy aims to enhance regional stability through strengthened alliances and partnerships.
- Economic Opportunities: The Indo-Pacific offers immense economic opportunities, but it also presents challenges related to market access, trade disputes, and intellectual property protection. President Biden’s administration must navigate these complexities to promote economic growth.
- Geopolitical Shifts: The Indo-Pacific is witnessing shifting geopolitical alignments, with countries reassessing their strategic priorities. President Biden’s approach seeks to align the United States with like-minded nations while preserving flexibility in response to evolving dynamics.
- Human Rights and Democracy: Upholding democratic values and human rights is a central component of President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy. Balancing this commitment with pragmatic diplomacy may require careful navigation in situations where U.S. interests intersect with autocratic regimes.
Conclusion
President Joe Biden’s commitment to boosting Pacific diplomacy represents a strategic shift aimed at reinforcing America’s presence in the Indo-Pacific and fostering regional stability. His multi-pronged approach, including strengthening alliances and partnerships, countering China’s assertiveness, promoting economic engagement, and addressing global challenges, reflects a nuanced understanding of the region’s complexities.
The Indo-Pacific is a dynamic and consequential theater, where the United States, its allies, and partners must navigate a complex web of geopolitical, economic, and security interests. President Biden’s initiatives, such as the Quad and AUKUS, signal a renewed American commitment to the region’s security and prosperity. Moreover, his emphasis on climate change and infrastructure development underscores the broader global challenges that require collective action.
As the Indo-Pacific continues to evolve, President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy provides a framework for addressing challenges, seizing opportunities, and shaping the region’s future. In doing so, the United States aims to promote a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific that benefits all nations in the region and contributes to global stability and prosperity.
Democracy
From Gerontocracy to Youthcracy: The Dilemma of Political Parties in Pakistan
Table of Contents
Introduction
The political landscape of Pakistan is undergoing a profound transformation, marked by a shift from gerontocracy to youthcracy. This article provides an in-depth exploration of this transition, its implications for political parties, and the evolving dynamics of power in the country. In a comprehensive examination, we delve into the challenges and opportunities faced by political parties as they adapt to this rapidly changing political landscape.
Understanding Gerontocracy
Gerontocracy, a term that has been frequently used to characterize the Pakistani political system, describes a situation where the elderly wield considerable power and influence in the governance of a nation. In Pakistan, this phenomenon has prevailed for decades, with senior politicians dominating the political stage. However, as the demographics of the country evolve, with a growing population of young citizens, political parties are confronted with a complex dilemma.
The Emergence of Youthcracy
The Power of the Youth Vote
Pakistan boasts a vibrant and youthful population, with a significant percentage under the age of 30. These young individuals are increasingly becoming politically aware and active, wielding the potential to reshape the nation’s political landscape. The emergence of youth power, often referred to as youthcracy, has become a defining feature of contemporary Pakistani politics.
The power of the youth vote cannot be overstated. The sheer number of young voters makes them a formidable force to be reckoned with. Political parties are beginning to recognize that winning the allegiance of this demographic is no longer an option but a necessity.
Challenges Faced by Political Parties
Balancing Experience and Fresh Perspective
One of the foremost challenges confronting political parties in Pakistan is how to navigate the delicate balance between the seasoned politicians who have long held sway and the energetic yet relatively inexperienced youth. The interplay between experience and fresh perspectives has become a pivotal factor for the success of any political party.
While experienced politicians bring a wealth of knowledge and a deep understanding of the intricacies of governance, they may also be associated with entrenched interests and resistance to change. In contrast, the youth represent innovation, fresh ideas, and a desire for reform. Striking the right equilibrium between these two demographics is crucial for political parties seeking to remain relevant and effective.
Adapting to Modern Communication
The youth are digitally connected, and their political awakening often happens on social media platforms. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok have become powerful tools for mobilization and advocacy. Political parties must adapt to these changing communication dynamics to engage with the younger generation effectively.
Traditional campaign methods, such as door-to-door canvassing and rallies, are no longer sufficient. Digital campaigns, online debates, and viral content creation have become the norm. Political parties must invest in sophisticated digital strategies, engaging with the youth where they are most active and receptive.
Strategies for Political Parties
Navigating the transition from gerontocracy to youthcracy requires strategic foresight and adaptability. Here are key strategies that political parties can employ to thrive in this evolving political landscape:
Encouraging Youth Participation
To embrace youthcracy, political parties must actively encourage young individuals to participate in politics. This goes beyond tokenism and superficial youth wings within parties. It involves offering substantial leadership roles to young politicians, mentorship programs, and providing platforms for the youth to voice their concerns.
Moreover, political parties should prioritize issues that resonate with the youth, such as education, employment opportunities, and environmental sustainability. Addressing these concerns demonstrates a commitment to the aspirations of the younger generation.
Embracing Technological Advancements
Utilizing technology for outreach, campaigns, and information dissemination is no longer optional—it is imperative. Political parties need to harness the power of data analytics, targeted advertising, and social media engagement to connect with the younger audience effectively.
Digital platforms provide an opportunity for direct interaction with voters, allowing parties to gauge sentiment, address concerns in real time, and tailor their messaging to specific demographics. This digital transformation also extends to fundraising efforts, which can now be conducted online with greater efficiency and transparency.
Promoting Transparency and Accountability
The youth are often more critical of corruption and inefficiency in government. Political parties must prioritize transparency and accountability to gain the trust of this demographic. Implementing robust anti-corruption measures, disclosing sources of funding, and holding party members accountable for misconduct are essential steps.
Furthermore, political parties should adopt a culture of inclusivity, where decisions are made collectively, and policies are developed through open dialogue. This approach not only fosters trust but also ensures that the concerns of diverse segments of the population, including the youth, are considered.
Conclusion
The transformation from gerontocracy to youthcracy is reshaping the landscape of Pakistani politics. This paradigm shift presents both challenges and opportunities for political parties. Those who successfully adapt to these changes will be better positioned to address the evolving needs and aspirations of the Pakistani population.
As we move forward, the key to political success in Pakistan lies in embracing the demographic realities of the country. The youth are not merely the future; they are the present. Their voices, aspirations, and demands must be at the forefront of political agendas.
In conclusion, the era of youthcracy in Pakistan signals a new dawn in the nation’s political history. It is a testament to the vitality and dynamism of the country’s youth. Political parties that understand this transition and respond proactively will not only survive but thrive in the evolving landscape of Pakistani politics.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- What is gerontocracy in the context of Pakistani politics? Gerontocracy refers to a political system where older individuals hold significant power and influence in the government.
- What is youthcracy, and how is it affecting political parties in Pakistan? Youthcracy represents the growing influence of the younger generation in politics, challenging traditional power dynamics within political parties in Pakistan.
- Why is the youth vote important in Pakistani politics? The youth vote is crucial because Pakistan has a significant young population, and their political engagement can shape the country’s future.
- How can political parties in Pakistan encourage youth participation? Political parties can encourage youth participation by offering leadership roles, mentorship programs, and creating platforms for young voices.
- What role does technology play in the transition to youthcracy? Technology is essential for reaching and engaging with the youth. Political parties need to utilize digital strategies for effective communication.
- Why is transparency and accountability important in attracting the youth to vote? The youth often demand transparency and accountability in politics, and parties that prioritize these values are more likely to gain their trust.
- What are the benefits of a political party embracing both experience and fresh perspectives? Embracing both experience and fresh perspectives allows a party to draw on the wisdom of seasoned politicians while also tapping into the energy and innovation of the youth.
- How can political parties effectively use social media to engage with the youth? Political parties can use social media by creating engaging content, participating in online discussions, and addressing the concerns and issues that matter most to young voters.
Analysis
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi Embarks on a 4-Day Russia Visit for Crucial Security Talks
Table of Contents
Introduction
In a rapidly evolving global landscape, diplomatic relations between nations play a pivotal role in shaping the course of international affairs. One such significant development that has garnered attention recently is the four-day visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to Russia for security talks. The visit holds immense significance, not just for China and Russia but also for the broader global community. This article delves into the key aspects of this visit, the implications it carries, and the broader context of Sino-Russian relations in the realm of security.
The Historical Context
China and Russia have a long history of diplomatic and strategic ties that have seen remarkable transformations over the years. In the Cold War era, the Sino-Soviet split created a substantial rift between these two communist giants. However, the early 21st century saw a remarkable rapprochement between the two nations, marked by the signing of the China-Russia Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation in 2001. This treaty has laid the foundation for strong economic, political, and security cooperation between the two nations.
Security Cooperation: The Heart of Sino-Russian Relations
Security cooperation has been at the heart of Sino-Russian relations, given their shared interests and concerns in various global and regional security issues. China and Russia have consistently supported each other in international forums, often in opposition to the policies of the United States and its allies. This security collaboration spans a wide range of areas, from arms sales to joint military exercises and cooperation in international organizations like the United Nations.
Key Agenda Points for Wang Yi’s Visit
Afghanistan and Regional Stability
One of the most pressing issues on the agenda is the evolving situation in Afghanistan. The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan has left a power vacuum in the region, with potential security implications for neighbouring countries, including China and Russia. Both nations share concerns about the possibility of a resurgence of extremist groups in Afghanistan and the potential for instability spilling over into Central Asia. Wang Yi’s visit to Russia is likely to involve discussions on strategies to promote peace and stability in Afghanistan.
Countering U.S. Influence
China and Russia have a shared interest in countering what they perceive as undue U.S. influence in global affairs. Both nations have voiced their concerns over U.S. policies, such as sanctions and military deployments, which they view as encroachments on their sovereignty and a threat to their security. This visit provides an opportunity for China and Russia to reaffirm their commitment to a multipolar world order and to discuss ways to counterbalance U.S. influence.
Strengthening Bilateral Security Ties
China and Russia have a robust history of military cooperation, including joint military exercises and arms sales. During Wang Yi’s visit, the two countries are likely to explore avenues for further enhancing their bilateral security ties. This could include discussions on joint defence projects, technology transfers, and information sharing to address common security challenges.
Regional Hotspots
In addition to Afghanistan, the two nations may also discuss other regional hotspots that have implications for their security interests. These may include issues related to North Korea, the South China Sea, and the Taiwan Strait. By coordinating their positions on these matters, China and Russia can exert greater influence in resolving regional conflicts and promoting stability.
The Implications
Wang Yi’s visit to Russia carries several important implications for the international community and the evolving global order:
Strengthening the China-Russia Axis
This visit is likely to strengthen the China-Russia axis, which has been characterized by deepening cooperation in multiple spheres. As both nations seek to assert themselves on the global stage, their partnership becomes increasingly influential, challenging the dominance of Western powers.
Countering Western Alliances
China and Russia’s alignment presents a challenge to the Western alliances led by the United States. Their coordinated efforts in international forums can obstruct Western initiatives and policies, leading to a more contentious international environment.
Regional Stability
The discussions on Afghanistan and other regional hotspots are essential for maintaining stability in critical areas. China and Russia, as major regional powers, can contribute significantly to conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts.
Multipolar World Order
China and Russia’s cooperation reflects their commitment to a multipolar world order. By balancing power and influence, they seek to prevent any single nation from dominating global affairs.
Economic Cooperation
While the visit primarily focuses on security talks, it could also pave the way for further economic cooperation between China and Russia. Strengthening economic ties can provide a solid foundation for their broader partnership.
Conclusion
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s four-day visit to Russia for security talks is a significant development in the ever-evolving landscape of international relations. As China and Russia continue to assert themselves as major global players, their partnership becomes increasingly influential. The outcome of this visit will not only impact the bilateral relations between the two nations but also have far-reaching implications for global security and the balance of power in the 21st century.
The world watches with keen interest as China and Russia strengthen their alliance and navigate the complexities of international diplomacy. How they choose to leverage their partnership will shape the future of international politics and security in the years to come.
-
Featured4 years ago
The Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News3 years ago
Prioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China3 years ago
Coronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada3 years ago
Socio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Conflict3 years ago
Kashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy3 years ago
Missing You! SPSC
-
Democracy3 years ago
President Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital4 years ago
Pakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills