India’s 61-run demolition of Pakistan in Colombo exposes systematic flaws in team selection, tactical nous, and leadership under Salman Agha

When Salman Agha won the toss and elected to bowl first under the Colombo floodlights on Sunday evening, few could have predicted the scale of Pakistan’s capitulation that would follow. India’s comprehensive 61-run victory—their eighth win in nine T20 World Cup encounters against their arch-rivals—was not merely a defeat. It was an autopsy of Pakistan cricket’s endemic problems: mystifying team selections, baffling tactical decisions, and a captaincy that appears chronically underprepared for the intensity of India-Pakistan clashes.

The scoreline tells part of the story. India posted 175/7 in their 20 overs, with Ishan Kishan’s blistering 77 off 40 balls serving as the cornerstone. In response, Pakistan crumbled to 114 all out in just 18 overs, their batting lineup disintegrating like a sandcastle before the tide. But the numbers alone cannot capture the deeper malaise—the inexplicable decision-making that has become a hallmark of Pakistan’s recent tournament play.

The Toss That Lost the Match

Salman Agha won the toss and decided to bowl first on what he described as a “tacky” surface, believing it would assist bowlers in the early overs. The logic appeared sound on paper: exploit early movement, restrict India to a manageable total, and chase under lights as the pitch improved. India’s captain Suryakumar Yadav, by contrast, indicated they would have batted first anyway, expecting the pitch to slow down enough to counter any dew advantage later.

The decision proved catastrophic. On spin-friendly Colombo tracks that historically become harder to bat on as matches progress, Pakistan handed India first use of the surface. As events unfolded, 175 became the highest score in India-Pakistan T20 World Cup history—hardly the restricted total Agha had envisioned. Worse, when Pakistan batted, the pitch offered turn and variable bounce that rendered strokeplay treacherous.

The toss decision encapsulated a broader failure of match awareness. Senior analysts on ESPN Cricinfo noted that if pitches are tacky to begin with, they tend to get better as temperatures drop at night—precisely the opposite of Agha’s reasoning. This fundamental misreading of conditions set the tone for what followed.

The Selection Mysteries: Fakhar, Naseem, and Nafay

Perhaps nothing better illustrates Pakistan’s rudderless approach than the team selection. Three players with proven credentials against India—or specific skills suited to Colombo conditions—were inexplicably relegated to the bench.

Fakhar Zaman, one of Pakistan’s most destructive limited-overs batsmen, watched from the sidelines despite his storied history against India. Fakhar has played 117 T20Is, scoring 2,385 runs at a strike rate of 130.75, and his 2017 Champions Trophy century against India remains one of Pakistan cricket’s defining moments. His aggressive batting style and ability to play pace and spin with equal fluency made him an obvious selection for the high-pressure cauldron of an India clash. Yet the team management persisted with Babar Azam at number four—a batsman who managed just 5 runs off 7 balls before being bowled by Axar Patel and whose recent form against India has been woeful.

Naseem Shah, the young pace sensation who has repeatedly demonstrated his ability to extract bounce and movement even from docile surfaces, was another puzzling omission. While Pakistan’s squad featured Naseem as a key pace option alongside Shaheen Shah Afridi, the playing XI instead deployed Faheem Ashraf—a bowler whose international returns have been modest at best. Naseem’s pace and ability to hit the deck hard would have provided the ideal counterpoint to India’s aggressive openers, particularly on a pitch offering assistance to quicker bowlers in the early overs.

Khawaja Nafay, named in the 15-man squad as a wicketkeeper-batsman option, similarly failed to make the cut. His exclusion was particularly glaring given Pakistan’s top-order fragility and the presence of two specialist wicketkeepers (Usman Khan and Sahibzada Farhan) in the lineup already.

The cumulative effect was a team that looked ill-equipped for the challenge, lacking both firepower and balance.

Spinner Overload: Too Many Cooks

If the batting order selections raised eyebrows, Pakistan’s bowling composition bordered on the incomprehensible. The team fielded a staggering array of spin options: Saim Ayub (part-time left-arm orthodox), Abrar Ahmed (leg-spinner/googly specialist), Shadab Khan (leg-spinner), Mohammad Nawaz (left-arm orthodox), Usman Tariq (mystery spinner), and captain Salman Agha himself (off-spinner).

Six spin options in a T20 match. The redundancy was staggering.

To make matters worse, Pakistan bowled five overs of spin in the powerplay alone—only the 13th time in T20 World Cup history that a fifth spin over has been bowled inside a powerplay. While the Colombo surface offered turn, this approach played directly into India’s hands. Kishan, a devastatingly effective player of spin, feasted on the lack of variety. Shadab Khan, Abrar Ahmed, and Shaheen Shah Afridi combined to concede 86 runs in six overs—a hemorrhaging of runs that effectively ended the contest as a spectacle.

The tactical poverty was evident in specific passages of play. Pakistan bowled Shadab Khan to two left-handed batters and brought Abrar Ahmed back despite him having a “stinker” of a night. In the death overs, rather than employing spin to squeeze India, Shaheen Shah Afridi was brought back for the final over and plundered for 16 runs, allowing India to surge past 175.

The spinner overload wasn’t merely a tactical misstep—it revealed a captain uncertain of his resources and unwilling to commit to a coherent plan.

The Batting Order Blunder: Agha Before Babar

Among the more peculiar decisions was the batting order itself. Salman Agha, the captain and an all-rounder by trade, was promoted to number three—ahead of Babar Azam, Pakistan’s most accomplished batsman.Even players like Mohammad Haris , Mohammad Rizwan ,Minhas were not picked for the squad , It is big blunder made by Aquib Javed and others who slected the squad . Pakistan team did not select the aggressive players like Abdul Samad and already wasted talented Asif Ali and Irfan Khan Niazi . There was none who could hit six to shift the pressure and speed up momentum . The chequred history of defeats against India in world cup still hounds and same happened today .Will anybody take the responsibility of poor selection and worst captaincy to step down and fix the issues . Even the smaller and new teams like,Afghanistan ,USA , Italy , Zimbabwe performed well and gave tough time to opponents . When will they learn the lesson . They prove to be a wall of Sand against India in world cup encounters disappointed and hurting the feelinhs and dreams of the fans .

The rationale is unclear. Agha’s T20 record is respectable but hardly stellar; his primary value lies in his ability to bowl tidy off-spin and provide lower-order impetus. Elevating him above Babar—who, despite recent struggles, remains Pakistan’s premier accumulator—suggested either a crisis of confidence in Babar or a fundamental misunderstanding of optimal batting orders.

When Pakistan’s chase began, the decision’s folly became immediately apparent. Hardik Pandya dismissed Sahibzada Farhan for a duck in his first over, and Jasprit Bumrah then removed both Saim Ayub and Salman Agha in quick succession. Pakistan found themselves at 13 for 3 within two overs, with their captain having contributed a meager 4 runs. Babar entered at the fall of the third wicket and lasted just 16 balls before departing for 5, caught between the need for consolidation and the mounting run rate.

The structural flaw was glaring: by promoting Agha, Pakistan had effectively wasted a top-order slot. Had Babar batted at three or as opener—his natural positions—he might have anchored the innings through the powerplay carnage. Instead, Pakistan’s best batsman arrived with the game already slipping away, the asking rate climbing, and pressure mounting exponentially.Pakistan failed to dominate both the pace and Spin attack of India .

Kishan’s Masterclass and India’s Clinical Execution

To credit Pakistan’s failings alone would be to diminish India’s superlative performance. Ishan Kishan’s 77 off 40 balls, featuring 10 fours and 3 sixes, set the template for an innings of controlled aggression. Kishan’s ability to dominate Pakistan’s spin-heavy attack—particularly his audacious strokeplay against Abrar Ahmed and Mohammad Nawaz—showcased the chasm in class and preparation between the two sides.

Captain Suryakumar Yadav contributed 32 off 29 balls, while Shivam Dube’s 27 off 17 deliveries and Tilak Varma’s 25 off 24 balls provided crucial support. India’s depth allowed them to absorb the twin blows of Abhishek Sharma’s early dismissal and Hardik Pandya’s duck, building partnerships and accelerating at will.

With the ball, India were relentless. Hardik Pandya and Jasprit Bumrah shared three early wickets, reducing Pakistan to 38/4 at the end of the powerplay. Axar Patel claimed two crucial scalps, including Babar Azam, while Varun Chakaravarthy’s 2 for 17 included back-to-back dismissals of Faheem Ashraf and Abrar Ahmed. The variety and precision of India’s attack—three seamers, three spinners, all delivering match-winning spells—stood in stark contrast to Pakistan’s scattergun approach.

A Pattern of Captaincy Failures

Salman Agha’s tenure as Pakistan captain has been brief, but the India match crystallized a troubling pattern. This was not an isolated aberration but rather symptomatic of deeper issues within Pakistan cricket: reactive rather than proactive thinking, selection driven by sentiment rather than form, and tactical naivety at crucial junctures.

Former Pakistan cricketers have been scathing. Ahead of the match, Rashid Latif, Mohammad Amir, and Ahmed Shehzad openly questioned Babar’s continued place in the team, highlighting concerns about his strike rate and diminishing returns in high-pressure games. Their prophecies proved prescient: Babar’s failure was emblematic of a team trapped between nostalgia for past glories and the brutal demands of modern T20 cricket.

The Pakistan Cricket Board’s instability has not helped. Frequent changes in leadership, coaching staff, and selection philosophy have created an environment where mediocrity is tolerated and accountability is scarce. This instability trickles down to team selection and on-field strategy, producing the kind of rudderless performance witnessed in Colombo.

What Now for Pakistan?

Pakistan’s path to the Super Eight stage remains viable but fraught with peril. They must now beat Namibia in their final group game to secure progression, a task that should be straightforward but, given recent form, carries no guarantees.

Beyond results, however, Pakistan faces deeper questions. Can Salman Agha learn from this debacle and impose a coherent tactical identity? Will the selectors have the courage to drop underperforming big names like Babar in favor of form players like Fakhar? And can the PCB provide the stability necessary for long-term planning rather than lurching from crisis to crisis?

The answers will define not only this tournament but Pakistan cricket’s trajectory for years to come. For now, the evidence suggests a team—and a system—in disarray.

Key Takeaways

• Toss Blunder: Pakistan’s decision to bowl first on a pitch that would deteriorate backfired spectacularly
• Selection Errors: Fakhar Zaman, Naseem Shah, and Khawaja Nafay inexplicably benched despite strong credentials
• Spinner Overload: Six spin options diluted Pakistan’s bowling attack, allowing India to dominate
• Batting Order Chaos: Salman Agha promoted above Babar Azam defied logic and wasted a top-order slot
• Systemic Issues: PCB instability and lack of accountability continue to undermine team performance

Match Summary:
India 175/7 (20 overs) – Ishan Kishan 77 (40), Suryakumar Yadav 32 (29); Saim Ayub 3/25
Pakistan 114 (18 overs) – Usman Khan 44 (34); Hardik Pandya 2/16, Jasprit Bumrah 2/17, Varun Chakaravarthy 2/17
Result: India won by 61 runs

About the Match: The encounter at R. Premadasa Stadium marked India’s eighth win over Pakistan in nine T20 World Cup meetings, reinforcing their psychological dominance in cricket’s most-watched rivalry. The result secured India’s passage to the Super Eight stage while leaving Pakistan’s campaign hanging by a thread.

The roar of the crowd in Rawalpindi was less a cheer for a victory and more a collective, heaving sigh of relief for a nation. When Babar Azam punched that ball through the covers to bring up his landmark century in the 2nd ODI Rawalpindi against Sri Lanka, it felt like the end of the most excruciating period of his already brilliant career. For months, the phrase Babar Azam Century Drought had haunted every analysis, every post-match show, and every fan’s worried conversation.

But this innings wasn’t just a number—it was a definitive roar from the Babar Azam Maestro, silencing the ridiculous whispers of doubt and catapulting him straight into the history books by tying the legendary Babar Azam Saeed Anwar Record. This hundred, achieved with that classic Babar grace under the most intense Pressure imaginable, wasn’t just a blip on the scorecard; it was the powerful re-affirmation that the world’s premier White-ball cricket batsman still has the unique heart and talent required to single-handedly win a match. The drought, often dramatically and unfairly labelled the 83 Innings Failure, now stands merely as a necessary struggle preceding a monumental historical achievement: matching Saeed Anwar’s formidable tally of Pakistan ODI Centuries.

🤯 The Weight of 83: Anatomy of the Longest Babar Azam Century Drought

If you want to know the true measure of a champion, don’t look at their peaks—look at how they survive the absolute pits. For a player who literally sets global benchmarks for consistency, an 83-innings stretch across all formats without a triple-digit score felt like an eternity. Honestly, the narrative began to get ugly: was the Maestro losing his signature touch? Was the unforgiving burden of expectation and captaincy simply too much?

The psychological impact of a run like that is impossible for us to truly comprehend. Every time he got out in the 70s or 80s, the public debate reached a fever pitch. Unlike a younger or lower-ranked player, the expectation on Babar is not just to score runs, it’s to score match-winning hundreds. This entire period of the 83 Innings Failure was a severe, public test of his incredible mental Resilience. It’s the kind of pressure few players in the modern game have had to live through. Babar carried the emotional weight of a cricket-mad country on his shoulders, and the longer the Babar Azam Century Drought persisted, the heavier that collective weight became. The century in the 2nd ODI Rawalpindi was thus more than a score; it was a deeply personal, cathartic, and collective release of tension.

🖼️ The Rawalpindi Masterpiece: Why This Century Was Different

The innings itself was exactly what we’ve come to expect from Babar Azam: authoritative, beautiful, risk-averse, yet relentlessly punishing against anything loose. It wasn’t some ugly, desperate slog for the line; it was a measured work of art built on an absolutely flawless technique.

On a surface at the Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium that demanded respect and concentration, Babar showed the world why he is considered an artist with the bat. His timing was crisp, and the sight of his majestic cover drive was truly Poetry in Motion. He expertly picked up singles and doubles, never allowing the Sri Lankan bowlers to settle, before finally shifting gears and accelerating seamlessly in the late overs. The key factor here is that he did this under pressure, helping the team set a truly challenging total that ultimately proved decisive. This was the performance of a genuine Match-winner, demonstrating both the incredible patience to absorb pressure early on and the explosive power to dominate when it mattered most.

👑 The Historical Context: Tying the Pakistan ODI Centuries Record

This is the part that will be engraved in stone. By scoring his 20th ODI century, Babar Azam drew level with the legendary Saeed Anwar for the most Pakistan ODI Centuries.

The comparative speed is simply astonishing. Saeed Anwar will always be one of the most iconic stroke-makers Pakistan has ever produced, but Babar has reached the very same summit in almost half the innings. This statistic isn’t just trivia; it powerfully highlights the generational shift and Babar’s sheer, unparalleled efficiency in White-ball cricket. The Babar Azam Saeed Anwar Record is more than a simple numerical tie; it perfectly symbolizes Babar’s arrival as the modern, high-volume standard-bearer for Pakistan ODI Centuries, brilliantly continuing the legacy of attacking, world-class batting established by players like Anwar decades ago.

🔢 From ‘Failure’ to ‘Fastest’: The Statistical Rebuttal of the Maestro

The media noise and public fixation on the Babar Azam Century Drought—the so-called 83 Innings Failure—conveniently ignored his underlying, world-class excellence. Even during that drought, Babar was consistently churning out vital half-centuries, maintaining a truly elite batting average well above 50. The fact remains: Babar Azam is historically among the fastest players in the game’s history to reach numerous career milestones (2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 ODI runs). This century acts as the perfect, powerful statistical rebuttal to all the negativity. It fully reaffirms his remarkable conversion rate compared to his peers and puts him firmly back where he belongs—among the global ODI elite, where his average and consistency are genuinely rivalled by only a handful of players in history.

🚀 Conclusion: What’s Next for the Maestro?

The century in the 2nd ODI Rawalpindi wasn’t just a personal win; it was a desperately needed, huge injection of confidence for the entire Pakistani team. The breaking of the Babar Azam Century Drought clears the mental slate for the captain and star batsman, allowing him to focus solely on the team’s massive goals ahead. With the Babar Azam Saeed Anwar Record now tied, the obvious next step—and the next guaranteed headline—will be breaking it. The Babar Azam Maestro has just proven that his mental resilience is every bit as potent and reliable as his signature cover drive. This historic, drought-ending innings serves as a loud reminder that true champions don’t stop scoring runs; they merely take a powerful, visible breath before their next statement of dominance. For Babar Azam, the agonising wait is finally over. The real, defining legacy, however, is just getting started.

The ongoing India vs Australia cricket series has delivered high-octane action, but one subplot that’s capturing headlines is the return of wrist-spinner Kuldeep Yadav. After being benched in the initial ODIs, Kuldeep’s inclusion in the third match has reignited discussions about India’s spin strategy and his role in the team’s future.

🏏 India vs Australia: A Series of Twists

The bilateral series between India and Australia has been anything but predictable. With both teams experimenting ahead of the T20 World Cup, the matches have seen a mix of youth and experience. India, led by Shubman Gill in the ODIs and Suryakumar Yadav in the T20Is, has shown flashes of brilliance but also faced setbacks—especially in the first ODI loss at Perth The Indian Express.

Australia, captained by Mitchell Marsh, has fielded a power-packed lineup with names like Travis Head, Josh Inglis, and Tim David. Their aggressive approach has tested India’s bowling depth, particularly in seam-friendly conditions.

🔁 Kuldeep Yadav: From Sidelines to Spotlight

Initially left out of the playing XI in the first two ODIs, Kuldeep Yadav was finally brought into the squad for the third ODI after an injury to all-rounder Nitish Kumar Reddy NDTV Sports. His selection wasn’t just a tactical move—it was a response to growing calls from fans and analysts who questioned India’s reluctance to use a proven match-winner in spin-friendly conditions.

Kuldeep’s wrist spin offers a unique edge, especially against aggressive Australian batters who prefer pace on the ball. His ability to turn the game with middle-over breakthroughs makes him a valuable asset, particularly on slower pitches like those in Sydney and Adelaide.

📊 Why Kuldeep’s Role Matters

• Middle-over control: Kuldeep’s variations disrupt partnerships and slow down scoring.
• Left-arm wrist spin rarity: Few bowlers in world cricket offer his angle and deception.
• Proven record vs Australia: He has consistently troubled Aussie batters in past encounters.

With the T20 World Cup on the horizon, India’s management will be closely watching his performances. If he delivers, Kuldeep could cement his place not just in the playing XI, but in India’s long-term white-ball plans.

📺 What’s Next in the Series?

As the T20Is unfold, fans can expect more surprises. India’s young guns like Abhishek Sharma and Tilak Varma are making their mark, while veterans like Jasprit Bumrah and Rohit Sharma provide stability Pragativadi. Whether Kuldeep continues to feature will depend on pitch conditions and team balance—but his recent inclusion suggests the tide may be turning in his favor.

SEO Keywords: india vs australia, kuldeep yadav, india vs australia 2025, kuldeep yadav comeback, india playing XI, india vs australia T20I, kuldeep yadav vs australia