Opinion
Muskan’s Defiance will Explode India
India is imploding fast and it will be exploded soon. The minorities are not safe there. The Muslims are facing the worst kind of persecution in today’s India at the hands of goons of RSS and BJP on the behest of the state because the Prime Minister is a fanatic who believes in Hindutva. Narendra Modi has made India the most dangerous country for minorities. No Muslim is safe in India today including cricketers, actors, and now the students. The fire that was started by the extremist goons of RSS will destroy India and it is just written on the wall.
After years of persecution and suffocation, there is now a Muslim uprising in India as evident from the daring act of chanting ‘All-O-Akbar’ slogans by Karnataka’s Muskan in front of RSS goons backed by Modi and his BJP. Muskan was heckled by the goons and fanatics as she was wearing a Burqa or Hijab.
The episode has stirred an outrage within India itself and led to many protests when schools in Karnataka state-imposed ban on female students wearing Hijab. Muskan showed great courage just in front of the goons and she is still in high spirits. She said that she will continue wearing Hijab as it is part of being a Muslim.
The friends of Muskan from other communities have also vowed to support her. Muskan narrates the story of that day when she went to college to submit an assignment. Those goons were not allowing her to go inside because she was in the Burqa. They started shouting the slogan ‘Jai Shri Ram’ in front of Muskan and she started reciting ‘Allah-o-Akbar’ in response. Muskan says that it is her basic and fundamental right to wear Hijab or Burqa and she will continue exercising her due right.
The ban on Hijab in schools has invited severe outcry among Muslims in southern India as it led to large crowds to take to the streets to protest against the restrictions. It has developed a sense of fear among the minority Muslim community that thinks that it is sheer persecution under the Hindu nationalist government of Modi.
After years of persecution and suffocation, there is now a Muslim uprising in India.
Some members of the ruling party are giving statements while defending the decision of ban that is further threatening for the Muslims as it encourages the RSS goons.
The Chief Minister of Karnataka Basavaraj Bommai failed to control the situation and announced to close all the schools and colleges in the state for three days. Some incidents of violence were also reported from several districts after the controversy over students wearing Hijab on campus got intensified. The Education Minister of the state BC Nagesh also refused to lift the ban. He asked the students to explore the other options if they are unwilling to follow the uniform dress code defined by the state.
The insane decision was criticized even within India as Bollywood celebrities, media professionals, intellectuals and politicians condemned the Modi government’s Hindutva-inspired policies. The opposition parties have also warned the Modi government that this continuous discrimination against Muslims will not go well with the country as it will be catastrophic in days to come. A student also went to the court for filing the petition in which she maintained that wearing the Hijab is a fundamental right to religion guaranteed by the constitution of India. The Karnataka High Court also appealed for peace and calm.
Growing extremism in India in Modi’s tenure is truly worrisome for all communities and it should be a wake-up call especially for Muslims to take a firm stand and fight for their rights. The Muslims are in continuous danger in India since Narendra Modi took over the reins. The minorities are being lynched. Their homes are put on fire while they are being labeled as traitors under the sedition charges.
In today’s India, Bollywood stars hailing from the Muslim community aren’t safe anymore. The hatred has crossed all the limits as Muslim players in the Indian cricket team are also facing the worst bigotry by the goons of RSS and BJP. Just last year, Pakistan defeated India in a cricket match and then the goons of RSS started blaming Muhammad Shami-the only Muslim player in the Indian cricket team- for the defeat while also labelling him a ‘traitor’.
Modi is proving Jinnah right, who used to say that Hindus and Muslims are two separate nations and they cannot live together. In Modi’s India, the two-nation theory by Muhammad Ali Jinnah proves to be right.
What happened with actor Shah Rukh Khan at the funeral of legendary singer Lata Mangeshkar is very disturbing. The BJP started a campaign against him whether he ‘spat’ on Lata’s mortal remains or recited a prayer. It was a great moment when Shah Rukh walked to the coffin of the legendary singer to pay his last homage along with his manager who was a Hindu. Shah Rukh paid his last homage in his Muslim way while reciting some prayers while his manager did in her Hindu way but that great moment was polluted by the fanatics of RSS and BJP mindset.
It is really unfortunate that instead of guarding the minorities, the state itself is involved in the persecution of Muslims at the behest of Modi. It is a matter of shame that those who bulldozed the Babri mosque are now sitting in the power corridors of India while tarnishing the image of their own country.
The time isn’t far away when the Muslims in India will decide about their future because they are continuously facing the worst kind of persecution. They are beaten up for eating beef. They aren’t allowed to offer prayers in public places. Now, extremism has reached educational institutions, which is really unfortunate.
India has to decide whether it believes in democracy or Hindutva. It should be decided what will be the future of Muslims in India. The future scenario for minorities living in India looks extremely grim. The defiance of Muskan has exposed India badly in the public.
Via DT
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Finance
Jennifer Garner’s Latest Projects: Business Ventures Beyond Hollywood
Most celebrity business ventures are licensing deals wearing a founder’s costume. The name goes on the label, the cheque clears, and an operating company nobody has heard of does the actual work.
Jennifer Garner’s is not that. On 6 February 2026, she rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange as Once Upon A Farm went public at $18 per share with a valuation of $724 million.
The company she co-founded is now a listed public entity with audited financials, a board seat in her name, and a stock price that has since gone down. That last detail is the most interesting part of the story.
Key Takeaways
- The IPO: Once Upon A Farm listed on the NYSE as OFRM, raising $197.9 million at the midpoint of its marketed range.
- The pop: shares closed day one up about 17%, then traded at $25.10 by 9 February — nearly 40% above the listing price.
- The reality check: the stock was down about 15% for the year by August 2026.
- The business is real: $225 million in annual revenue for the year ending September 2025, up more than 40%.
- Her role is contractual and disclosed: board director, co-founder and spokesperson, with compensation set out in the S-1.
What Once Upon A Farm Actually Is
The company sells organic, cold-pressed refrigerated food for children — pouches, smoothies, applesauce and oat bars — through grocery retail and direct-to-consumer channels.
It was founded by serial entrepreneurs Cassandra Curtis and Ari Raz, with Garner and CEO John Foraker joining as co-founders two years later. Foraker’s background matters to the credibility of the operation: he ran Annie’s Homegrown for more than a decade and served as a president at General Mills.
Note: founding-date reporting varies between 2011 and 2015 depending on the source. Verify before publication.
The Financial Trajectory
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Annual revenue (yr ending Sept 2025) | $225 million |
| Year-on-year growth | Over 40% |
| CAGR since 2018 | More than 60% |
| IPO valuation | $724 million |
| Capital raised | $197.9 million |
| Shares sold by company | ~7.6 million |
| Shares sold by existing holders | ~3.4 million |
| Lead bookrunners | Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase |
A compound annual growth rate above 60% sustained over seven years is not a celebrity endorsement outcome. It is a consumer packaged goods outcome — and CPG is one of the hardest categories in which to build distribution from scratch.
What Her Actual Job Is
This is where the Once Upon A Farm story diverges most sharply from the celebrity-brand template, because the terms are public.
The S-1 discloses that Garner serves on the public company’s board of directors and continues as co-founder and spokesperson — “Farmer Jen” — a role for which she was paid $1 million in the prior year, with $2 million to $3 million in expected annual compensation through 2028, separate from stock options and an IPO-linked bonus.
She also worked the roadshow directly. Garner described the investor meetings to Forbes as rooms full of existing customers, noting that families already trusted the product.
That is a meaningful distinction for anyone assessing celebrity-backed companies. There is a difference between a founder who licenses a likeness and a founder who sits on the board, pitches institutional investors and has compensation disclosed in a registration statement.
The Mission Structure
Once Upon A Farm is a public benefit corporation — the “PBC” in its legal name — which means its charter permits management to weigh mission alongside shareholder returns.
Garner has framed the IPO itself as a mission decision. Selling to a major food conglomerate would have cost the existing team control of the business; a listing preserved it while raising capital.
The concrete expression of that mission is WIC certification. Getting products approved so low-income families can purchase them through the federal nutrition programme has been a stated priority, and the brand now holds that distinction in more than 20 states. Garner has called it the company’s north star.
It connects to a longer track record — she had been a trustee for Save the Children for several years before joining the company in 2017.
The Risks the Prospectus Discloses
A public listing forces disclosure that private celebrity ventures never face. Three risks stand out.
Tariff and sourcing exposure. The prospectus highlighted risks related to tariffs and trade barriers, particularly against Mexico and South America, from where the company sources a significant portion of its fruit and vegetable ingredients.
Key-person concentration. A brand built substantially on one founder’s public identity carries a risk no diversified CPG company does.
Acquisition framing. Ahead of the listing, Hedgeye analyst Bennett Cheer characterised the company as an acquisition “play” — a view that treats the IPO as a staging post toward a strategic sale rather than a destination.
The Post-IPO Slide, and What It Tells You
The stock’s path is the honest part of this story. Priced at $18, up 17% on day one, close to $25 within a week, then down roughly 15% for the year by August.
Garner’s stated response has been to ignore the daily price and focus on execution — her position being that the stock follows the mission rather than the reverse.
Whether or not one finds that convincing as investor communication, the underlying pattern is common and worth understanding. Consumer IPOs frequently pop on scarcity — the listing was described as a rare food offering that excited investors — and then reprice once the float settles and quarterly results replace the narrative.
For investors, the lesson generalises. A founder’s celebrity generates demand at listing. It does not generate gross margin.
The Broader Commercial Portfolio
Beyond Once Upon A Farm, Garner’s commercial activity follows a consistent pattern: long-term brand relationships rather than one-off endorsements.
She has been the recurring face of Capital One’s advertising campaigns, continuing through 2026. She brokered Once Upon A Farm’s first sports sponsorship in 2024 — a multi-year deal making it Angel City FC’s exclusive children’s snack partner.
She was named to the Forbes 50 Over 50 class of 2026 at age 54, alongside continued acting work.
What This Means for the Global Market in 2027
Coverage of celebrity businesses stops at the launch. Here is what actually determines outcomes.
Public listing is the real test of a celebrity brand. Private valuations are negotiated; public ones are voted on daily. Expect more celebrity-founded consumer companies to attempt listings after this precedent — and expect most to trade below their debut.
Governance disclosure becomes the differentiator. Once Upon A Farm published its founder compensation structure. Investors evaluating the next celebrity IPO should ask for the same and treat its absence as a signal.
Tariff exposure is the underpriced risk in food CPG. Companies sourcing produce from Mexico and South America face input volatility that margin models built in a stable trade environment do not capture.
The PBC structure will be tested. A public benefit corporation’s mission commitments have not yet been stress-tested against a sustained share price decline. Once Upon A Farm may become the case study.
Acquisition remains the likely endgame. If the Hedgeye thesis holds, a strategic buyer eventually acquires the brand. The question for shareholders is whether that happens above or below the $18 listing price.
Frequently Asked Questions
What company did Jennifer Garner found?
Garner is a co-founder and chief brand officer of Once Upon A Farm, an organic children’s food company. She joined in September 2017 alongside CEO John Foraker; the business was originally founded by Cassandra Curtis and Ari Raz.
When did Once Upon A Farm go public?
The company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker OFRM on 6 February 2026, pricing at $18 per share for a valuation of $724 million and raising $197.9 million.
How much revenue does Once Upon A Farm generate?
The company reported $225 million in annual revenue for the year ending September 2025, representing growth of more than 40% year-on-year and a compound annual growth rate above 60% since 2018.
Is Jennifer Garner paid by Once Upon A Farm?
Yes, and the terms are disclosed. She was paid $1 million in the year before the IPO, with $2 million to $3 million in expected annual compensation through 2028, separate from stock options and an IPO-linked bonus.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Inside Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon Speech Requirements: Structural Reforms and Defense Strategy
Pentagon commanders told to nominate troops meeting waist-to-height and grooming standards for the Sept 30 State of the Force address. What the memo says.
Executive Summary / Key Takeaways
- Internal emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show the Pentagon asked commanders to nominate service members meeting specific physical and grooming criteria to attend Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address on 30 September 2026.
- Nominees must pass the Army fitness test, meet its waist-to-height ratio requirement, and maintain “impeccable” grooming and uniform standards with no exceptions.
- Selection also weighs “demonstrated leadership quality and professional character,” with a clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service.
- Selected attendees may have the opportunity to take part in a physical training session with the secretary.
- The event falls exactly one year after the Quantico address to senior officers, where physical standards were a central theme — making this a measurable one-year checkpoint on that policy agenda.
Attendance criteria for a cabinet secretary’s speech would normally be an administrative footnote. In this case the criteria are the policy statement.
The Pentagon has asked commanders to nominate troops to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “State of the Force” address, specifying that service members must meet waist-to-height requirements and exhibit “impeccable” grooming standards, according to emails reviewed by the Wall Street Journal and summarised by Newsweek and other outlets. Candidates will be selected based on demonstrated leadership quality and professional character, and will also have the opportunity to work out with the secretary.
The guidance was sent to Army commanders and specifies that nominees must pass the Army’s fitness test and meet its waist-to-height ratio requirement, with grooming standards applying without exception. Nominees are expected to be top performers within their units, with a clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service, and to demonstrate strong presence, clear communication and sound judgment under pressure — serving as model representatives for peers and subordinates across the joint force. A Pentagon official declined to comment on the specific selection criteria.
2. Core Strategic Analysis
2.1 What the memo requires
| Requirement | Standard specified | Applies to | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical fitness | Must pass the Army fitness test | Nominated attendees | WSJ via Newsweek |
| Body composition | Must meet Army waist-to-height ratio | Nominated attendees | WSJ |
| Appearance | “Impeccable” grooming and uniform standards, no exceptions | Nominated attendees | WSJ |
| Character | Demonstrated leadership quality, professional character | Selection criterion | WSJ |
| Record | Clear record of integrity, discipline, selfless service | Selection criterion | WSJ |
| Event date | 30 September 2026 | “State of the Force” address | WSJ |
| Additional | Possible physical training session with the secretary | Selected attendees | WSJ |
2.2 The one-year policy arc
The address arrives exactly one year after Hegseth summoned senior generals and admirals to Marine Corps Base Quantico on 30 September 2025 for a speech centred on warrior ethos and combat readiness. Physical standards were a central theme of that address, which introduced new height and weight requirements across the armed forces. “It all starts with physical fitness and appearance,” Hegseth told the audience, framing his reforms as a matter of institutional standards and telling officers unwilling to enforce them to resign.
Subsequent implementation showed the Quantico directives being treated as binding orders across the services, with wing-level distribution of memoranda and service-specific implementation guidance following. Reporting also noted the introduction of testosterone screening for service members over 30 as part of the broader fitness agenda.
That history is what makes the current memo analytically significant rather than merely unusual. It is the second consecutive September in which physical standards have been the organising theme of the department’s flagship internal address — which suggests a sustained programme rather than a one-off emphasis.
3. Structural Drivers and Competitor Gaps
Most coverage of this story has focused on the novelty of the attendance criteria. The more consequential questions for defence contractors, analysts and policy trackers sit one level down.
Retention and medical exemption policy. The grooming component intersects with a long-standing medical exemption framework. Many Black service members have historically received medical shaving waivers because the structure of their hair causes ingrown bumps, irritation and infection when shaved — a condition recognised in military medicine. How “no exception” language interacts with existing medical waiver policy is the practical implementation question, and it has direct workforce consequences across a force of roughly 2.1 million personnel.
Departmental renaming. Several outlets now refer to Hegseth by the title Secretary of War rather than Secretary of Defense, reflecting the department’s rebranding under the current administration. For procurement documentation, contract citations and regulatory filings, the nomenclature change is not cosmetic — it affects how policy documents are indexed and cited.
Signal versus substance for contractors. A standards-and-readiness agenda has budget implications that differ sharply from a platform-and-procurement agenda. Physical readiness, medical screening, training infrastructure and personnel systems are a different contracting universe from shipbuilding or munitions. Defence-sector analysts tracking where discretionary attention is going should read the repeated emphasis on personnel standards as a directional indicator.
Selection mechanics as message control. Hand-selecting an audience by physical criteria produces an audience that visually embodies the policy being announced. Whether that is read as reinforcing standards or as staging depends substantially on the observer’s priors, and both readings have been advanced in coverage of the memo. The verifiable facts are the criteria themselves and the date.
4. Key Implications for Stakeholders
Defence contractors. The consistency of the personnel-standards theme across two consecutive years suggests durable budget attention in human-performance, medical screening and training services rather than a passing emphasis. Watch the FY2027 budget request for corroboration.
Political and policy analysts. The 30 September address is the clearest scheduled opportunity to assess what has actually changed in the year since Quantico. Substantive markers to watch: whether new force-wide requirements are announced, whether existing standards are revised, and whether the medical waiver framework is addressed directly.
Military intelligence and HR professionals. Implementation guidance, not the speech, is where the operational content will sit. Last year’s pattern saw memoranda distributed across wings with service-specific guidance following separately.
Journalists and researchers. Original documentation lives at Defense.gov. Given the volume of secondary aggregation around this story, primary releases are the appropriate citation source.
5. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What are the requirements to attend Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon speech?
Nominated service members must pass the Army fitness test, meet the Army’s waist-to-height ratio requirement, and maintain impeccable grooming and uniform standards with no exceptions. Commanders also weigh demonstrated leadership quality, professional character and a clear record of integrity and discipline.
Q2: When is the State of the Force address?
The address is scheduled for 30 September 2026 — exactly one year after Hegseth’s Quantico speech to senior generals and admirals, which also centred on physical standards and combat readiness.
Q3: Who selects the troops who attend?
Military commanders across the branches were instructed by internal email to nominate junior officers and enlisted personnel meeting the stated criteria. A Pentagon official declined to comment on the specific requirements.
Q4: Will attendees do anything besides listen to the speech?
The internal emails indicate selected troops will have the opportunity to take part in a physical training session with the secretary.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Remembering Eliana Moreno: The Legacy of NBC LA’s “Eli in the Heli”
Key Takeaways
- Eliana Moreno, longtime aerial reporter for NBC4 Los Angeles and Telemundo 52, died September 15, 2026, in a helicopter crash in Chatsworth, Los Angeles, while covering a traffic collision.
- Her pilot, veteran aviator George Marciniw, and a third person on the ground also died in the crash.
- Moreno had covered Southern California from the air since September 2010, becoming known to viewers and followers as “Eli in the Heli.”
- She graduated from Chapman University in 2010 with degrees in broadcast journalism and political science, and had said she knew she wanted to be a TV journalist since age 11.
- She was engaged to Robert Barrientos, having announced their engagement in October 2025, and is remembered by colleagues as a source of steadiness during breaking news coverage.
- The crash remains under investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board.
A Career Built in the Air
Eliana Moreno spent 16 years reporting Southern California’s biggest breaking news stories from above — traffic collisions, wildfires, police pursuits, and everything in between — for NBC4 Los Angeles and its sister station, Telemundo 52. She worked for Angel City Air Inc., the company that operates News Chopper 4, from September 2010 until her death.
Colleagues at Telemundo described her as, in their words, “the best airborne reporter in all of Los Angeles,” praising both her professionalism and her role as a calming, dependable presence in the newsroom during chaotic live coverage.
Moreno had wanted to be a television journalist since she was 11 years old. Rather than starting in a smaller regional market, as is common in local news, she moved directly into the Los Angeles market immediately after graduating from Chapman University in 2010 with dual degrees in broadcast journalism and political science. Before that, she anchored and reported in both English and Spanish for outlets in Orange County, where she was born and raised.
“Eli in the Heli”
Moreno’s Instagram handle, “Eli in the Heli,” became something of a personal brand among Southern California viewers who followed her aerial coverage and off-duty posts — sunsets over the city, long shifts during breaking news, and glimpses of life alongside her flight crew. In 2023, after working 76 hours over the course of several days covering a story, she wrote that she couldn’t complain because she had “the best job in the world.”
She and pilot George Marciniw began flying together in 2023 and developed a close working partnership, often crediting each other in the images and footage they shared publicly. Marciniw, who had more than 30 years of flight experience and graduated from Burbank High School in 1974, frequently attributed the photos on his own social accounts to “his companion and colleague, Moreno.”
Personal Life
Moreno announced her engagement to Robert Barrientos on October 28, 2025. She was also a mother. Friends and followers have described her as someone who balanced the demands of a physically and mentally grueling job — she guest-spoke at local high schools and colleges to aspiring journalists in her time off — with a full life outside the newsroom.
The Crash
The helicopter crashed the evening of September 15, 2026, between two buildings in Chatsworth while the crew was providing live coverage of a fatal collision between a bus and an SUV just blocks away. Three people died, including a person on the ground. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating; no official cause has been determined at this time.
A Community in Mourning
Tributes poured in from colleagues, viewers, and fellow journalists across Southern California within hours of the confirmation. NBC Los Angeles and Telemundo 52 both issued statements honoring Moreno’s professionalism and her years documenting the region’s biggest stories from above.
Who was Eliana Moreno?
Eliana Moreno was an aerial reporter for NBC4 Los Angeles and Telemundo 52, known as “Eli in the Heli,” who covered Southern California breaking news from a news helicopter for 16 years. She died on September 15, 2026, alongside pilot George Marciniw in a helicopter crash in Chatsworth, Los Angeles.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News5 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China5 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada5 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Democracy5 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Conflict5 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy5 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital6 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
