Several Articles in the Constitution of Pakistan deal with the process of the no-confidence motion; prescribing the legal consequences against the Prime Minister of Pakistan. A vote of no-confidence against the prime minister would be conducted by an open vote by division as per Constitution. And if the Prime Minister loses the confidence of the majority of the members of the National Assembly, the entire federal government has to resign. Till the election of a new Prime Minister, the ousted prime minister would continue as a transitory head.
The first step for the vote of no-trust motion would be that if the National Assembly is not in session as per article 54 of the Constitution to file a requisition for summoning the House and that requisition must be signed by at least one-fourth of members of the total House. The speaker of the National assembly would have a maximum of 14 days to summon the session. As per article 95 of the Constitution, a vote of no-confidence against the prime minister requires at least 20 per cent of the total MNAs, which means that 68 members have to sign a resolution for it to be voted on. After the Assembly in session, the Secretary of National Assembly would circulate a notice for a no-confidence resolution, which will be moved on the next working day. As per Article 95 (2) of the Constitution, the proceedings of vote of no confidence would not take place before the expiry of three days or not later than seven days.
If the resolution of the vote of no confidence would be passed by a majority of the total membership of the National Assembly, the Prime Minister shall cease to hold office, the Prime Minister as per Article 95 of the Constitution would cease to hold the office and his cabinet would also be dissolved simultaneously. As per Article 58 of the Constitution, the Prime Minister cannot go for the dissolution of national assembly against whom a notice of a resolution for a vote of no-confidence has been given in the National Assembly but has not been voted upon or against whom such a resolution has been passed or who is continuing in office after his resignation or after the dissolution of the National Assembly.
As per article 95 of the Constitution, a vote of no-confidence against the prime minister requires at least 20 per cent of the total MNAs.
As per Article 48 of the Constitution, the President would dissolve the national assembly in his discretion where, a vote of no-confidence having been passed against the Prime Minister, and no other member of the national assembly command the confidence of the majority of the members of the National Assembly in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, as ascertained in a session of the National Assembly summoned for the purpose. As per Article 94 of the Constitution, the President can ask the Prime Minister to continue to hold office until his successor enters upon the office of Prime Minister.
Through the 18th amendment in Constitution, Article 63A has been introduced whereby if a member of a Parliamentary Party composed of a single political party in a House votes or abstains from voting in the National Assembly contrary to any direction issued by the Parliamentary Party to which he belongs, in relation to the election of the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister or a vote of confidence or a vote of no-confidence he would be declared in writing by the Party Head to have defected from the political party, and the Party Head may forward a copy of the declaration to the Presiding Officer and the Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and further before making the declaration, the Party Head shall provide such member with an opportunity to show cause as to why such declaration may not be made against him. The said Article of the Constitution has further described that the Presiding Officer of the House shall within two days refer, and in case he fails to do so it shall be deemed that he has referred, the declaration to the Chief Election Commissioner who shall lay the declaration before the Election Commission for its decision thereon confirming the declaration or otherwise within 30 days of its receipt by the Chief Election Commissioner.
As soon as the Election Commission of Pakistan would confirm the declaration, the member of the National Assembly who violated the directions of Party Head shall cease to be a member of the National Assembly and his seat shall become vacant. However, the aggrieved member of the National Assembly by the decision of the Election Commission would have the right within 30 days to file an appeal to the Supreme Court, which shall decide the matter within 90 days from the date of the filing of the appeal.
Biden Boosts Pacific Diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. Engagement in the Indo-Pacific
Table of Contents
In an era marked by shifting global power dynamics, economic interdependence, and regional security challenges, the United States under the leadership of President Joe Biden has placed a renewed emphasis on its engagement in the Indo-Pacific region. The Indo-Pacific has emerged as a geopolitical epicentre, where economic vitality, strategic interests, and diplomatic endeavours converge. President Biden’s commitment to boosting Pacific diplomacy underscores a strategic shift aimed at reinforcing America’s presence, fostering regional stability, and building enduring partnerships.
This blog post delves into the multifaceted aspects of President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy strategy, examining its objectives, key initiatives, and implications for the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific. As we explore the dynamics of this critical region, we will see how President Biden’s approach seeks to address complex challenges while capitalizing on the vast opportunities presented by the Indo-Pacific.
Understanding the Indo-Pacific
Before delving into President Biden’s initiatives, it is imperative to comprehend the significance of the Indo-Pacific region. Stretching from the eastern shores of Africa to the western coast of the Americas, the Indo-Pacific encompasses a vast expanse of land and sea, home to over half the world’s population and accounting for a significant share of global economic output. It is a region of immense strategic importance, characterized by diverse cultures, economies, and geopolitical interests.
The Indo-Pacific hosts major global players, including China, India, Japan, and Australia, each with its own vision for the region’s future. China’s rapid economic rise, military modernization, and assertive behaviour in the South China Sea have sparked concerns among its neighbours and the broader international community. India’s burgeoning economy and growing influence further add to the region’s complexity.
The United States has long maintained a security presence in the Indo-Pacific through its alliances and partnerships, notably with Japan, South Korea, and Australia. However, in recent years, concerns arose about the sustainability of this commitment, prompting a reassessment of U.S. priorities in the region.
President Biden’s Pacific Diplomacy: Objectives and Initiatives
President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy strategy is rooted in a clear set of objectives aimed at promoting a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific. These objectives can be summarized as follows:
- Strengthening Alliances and Partnerships: The cornerstone of President Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy is the reinforcement of existing alliances, such as the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the cultivation of new partnerships. The Quad, a strategic forum comprising the United States, Japan, India, and Australia, has gained prominence as a mechanism for enhancing cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.
- Countering China’s Assertiveness: While the Biden administration has emphasized competition with China across various domains, it also seeks areas of cooperation, such as climate change and global health. The administration’s approach balances competition with engagement, recognizing that competition does not preclude cooperation.
- Economic Engagement: Recognizing the economic significance of the Indo-Pacific, President Biden has underscored the importance of trade and investment in the region. His administration has explored opportunities for economic partnerships and infrastructure development, such as the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative.
- Promoting Democracy and Human Rights: Upholding democratic values and human rights is integral to President Biden’s foreign policy approach. In the Indo-Pacific, this translates into support for democratic institutions, civil society, and the rule of law.
- Addressing Climate Change and Environmental Challenges: Climate change poses a significant threat to the Indo-Pacific, with rising sea levels and extreme weather events affecting many countries in the region. President Biden’s commitment to addressing climate change aligns with the region’s urgent need for environmental resilience.
Key Initiatives and Partnerships
- The Quad: The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or Quad, has emerged as a critical platform for security and strategic cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. President Biden has reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to the Quad, which includes regular meetings among the leaders of the United States, Japan, India, and Australia. The Quad’s agenda covers a wide range of issues, including maritime security, cybersecurity, infrastructure development, and vaccine distribution.
- AUKUS: The Australia, UK, and US (AUKUS) security partnership has garnered significant attention for its focus on enhancing defence capabilities and technology sharing. AUKUS aims to bolster Australia’s naval capabilities, particularly through the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. This initiative signals a deeper commitment to regional security in the Indo-Pacific.
- ASEAN Engagement: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) plays a central role in regional diplomacy. President Biden has actively engaged with ASEAN member states to strengthen ties and address common challenges. The United States is also working to advance the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, which emphasizes ASEAN centrality and principles of inclusivity and transparency.
- Infrastructure Investment: The Indo-Pacific is in dire need of infrastructure development to support economic growth and connectivity. President Biden’s administration has introduced the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative, aimed at mobilizing private sector investment in areas such as climate-resilient infrastructure, digital technology, and health security. This initiative complements China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and offers an alternative approach to infrastructure development.
- Climate Change Mitigation: Recognizing the existential threat posed by climate change, President Biden has prioritized climate action as a cornerstone of his foreign policy. The United States has engaged with Indo-Pacific nations to promote clean energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance climate resilience in the region.
Implications and Challenges
President Biden’s emphasis on boosting Pacific diplomacy carries profound implications for the United States, its allies, and the broader Indo-Pacific region. Some of the key implications and challenges include:
- Balancing Competition and Cooperation: Striking the right balance between competition and cooperation with China is a delicate task. While competition in the Indo-Pacific is inevitable, the United States and its allies must identify areas of common interest where cooperation is possible.
- Enhancing Regional Stability: The Indo-Pacific faces numerous security challenges, including territorial disputes, North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, and the rise of non-state actors. President Biden’s strategy aims to enhance regional stability through strengthened alliances and partnerships.
- Economic Opportunities: The Indo-Pacific offers immense economic opportunities, but it also presents challenges related to market access, trade disputes, and intellectual property protection. President Biden’s administration must navigate these complexities to promote economic growth.
- Geopolitical Shifts: The Indo-Pacific is witnessing shifting geopolitical alignments, with countries reassessing their strategic priorities. President Biden’s approach seeks to align the United States with like-minded nations while preserving flexibility in response to evolving dynamics.
- Human Rights and Democracy: Upholding democratic values and human rights is a central component of President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy. Balancing this commitment with pragmatic diplomacy may require careful navigation in situations where U.S. interests intersect with autocratic regimes.
President Joe Biden’s commitment to boosting Pacific diplomacy represents a strategic shift aimed at reinforcing America’s presence in the Indo-Pacific and fostering regional stability. His multi-pronged approach, including strengthening alliances and partnerships, countering China’s assertiveness, promoting economic engagement, and addressing global challenges, reflects a nuanced understanding of the region’s complexities.
The Indo-Pacific is a dynamic and consequential theater, where the United States, its allies, and partners must navigate a complex web of geopolitical, economic, and security interests. President Biden’s initiatives, such as the Quad and AUKUS, signal a renewed American commitment to the region’s security and prosperity. Moreover, his emphasis on climate change and infrastructure development underscores the broader global challenges that require collective action.
As the Indo-Pacific continues to evolve, President Biden’s Pacific diplomacy provides a framework for addressing challenges, seizing opportunities, and shaping the region’s future. In doing so, the United States aims to promote a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific that benefits all nations in the region and contributes to global stability and prosperity.
OIC Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir on the sidelines of the 78th session of the UN General Assembly
The OIC Ministerial Meeting of the Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir was held on September 20, 2023, at the United Nations headquarters, in New York on the sidelines of the 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly. The meeting was chaired by Mr Hissein Brahim Taha, the Secretary General of the OIC. It was attended by the foreign ministers and senior officials of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Niger and representative of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The ministers reaffirmed their support to the people of Jammu and Kashmir in their struggle to achieve the right of self-determination that was promised to them by the United Nations. The ministers also expressed their fervent desire to see an immediate end to the sufferings of the people of Kashmir so that conditions are created for a sustained and meaningful dialogue between Pakistan, India and the leadership of the people of Kashmir.
Ambassador Jalil Abbas Jilani, the foreign minister of Pakistan apprised the members of the Contact Group about the deteriorating and serious situation in Indian-occupied Kashmir, saying that “The current Indian leadership is bent upon perpetuating India’s occupation of Jammu & Kashmir.” He warned the members of the Contact Group that newly enacted laws are designed to change the demography of Kashmir. Otherwise, why India has issued millions of domicile certificates to Indian citizens to settle in Kashmir, he asked?
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah, participated today in the meeting of the Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir organized by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), on the sidelines of the 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA 78). Addressing the meeting, Prince Faisal bin Farhan said the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stands by the Muslim people in maintaining their Islamic identity and preserving their dignity. The foreign minister also reiterated the Kingdom’s support to the afflicted people in areas witnessing conflicts and unrest, including the people of the Jammu and Kashmir region.
Saudi Foreign Minister added that the Jammu and Kashmir issue constitutes one of the pressing challenges facing the security and stability of the region, the foreign minister said, warning that leaving the issue unresolved will contribute to regional instability. The Kingdom is exerting unremitting effort to mediate between the parties of the conflict in order to reduce escalation and achieve calm and a peaceful settlement to the issue in accordance with the relevant international resolutions, the foreign minister said. Such efforts emanate from the Kingdom’s unwavering stance in support of Islamic peoples. Deputy Minister for International Multilateral Affairs Dr. Abdulrahman Al-Rassi and Director-General of the Office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Abdulrahman Al-Dawood attended the meeting.
Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, representing the people of Jammu and Kashmir conveyed the gratitude of the people to brotherly member states of the OIC Contact Group for their steadfast and unwavering support extended to them in their struggle for the right of self-determination.
Dr. Fai added that the issue of Indian-occupied Kashmir continues to be unresolved and the international community has almost relinquished and retracted from the promise that was made to them in 1948. – the promise of the right of self-determination under the auspices of the United Nations. To break the will of the people of Kashmir, India has deployed over 900,000 soldiers fully armed and with unlimited powers under the draconian Kashmir-specific laws which have wreaked havoc in the region. The atrocities inflicted on the hapless Kashmiris have been documented by Indian and international human rights organizations, like Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch, including a 47-page report issued by the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights.
The following nine recommendations were made by Dr. Fai to the OIC Contact Group in Jammu and Kashmir for immediate action.
1. OIC must re-educate the member nations of the UN General Assembly that the conflict of Kashmir is primarily about the right to self-determination, no ifs and no buts.
2. OIC must persuade the United Nations to convey to the Government of India to rescind the Domicile Law which is designed to change the demography of Kashmir and change the majority Muslim character into a minority community
3. OIC should also convince the United Nations to prevail upon India to repeal all draconian laws, including the Unlawful Activity Prevention Act (UAPA), the Public Safety Act (PSA) which are being used to forcibly silence the people into submission.
4. Given the report, issued by the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights on June 14, 2018 & July 8, 2019, regarding the ‘Situation in Kashmir’, we request the OIC members of the Human Rights Council to endorse this report and initiate a joint OIC resolution to set up an enquiry commission on human rights violations in Kashmir during the forthcoming session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva to be held in February 2024.
5. Widely use and disseminate testimony of Dr Gregory Stanton, Chairman, ‘Genocide Watch’, which he gave to the United States Congress on January 12, 2022, and repeated that Kashmir was on the brink of genocide.
6. The OIC must provide ‘safe havens’ for the Kashmiri Diaspora, especially those fleeing oppression in Occupied Kashmir – scholars, activists, journalists, and businessmen – in OIC member states, in an institutional manner, like opening up visas/jobs / relocation facilitation for such skilled and professional Kashmiris, for whom living in Modi’s India has become unbearable.
7. In the ‘battle of ideas for Azadi (Freedom) of Kashmiri people, OIC must promote the 3 core causes together: PKR (Palestine, Kashmir, Rohingya); and establish a special website, combining genocide with resistance.
8. OIC should allocate emergency scholarship funds to the meritorious students of Kashmir who are the victims of Indian state terrorism.
9. OIC must persuade the Government of India to release all political prisoners unconditionally, including Mohammad Yasin Malik, Shabir Ahmed Shah, Masarat Alalm, Aasia Andrabi, Khurram Parvez, and others.
A Joint Communique was adopted unanimously during the Contact Group meeting which condemns the protracted detention of the entire Hurriyat leadership, the genuine voice of the Kashmiri political aspirations, and thousands of political activists, journalists and human rights defenders.
The Communique also reads:
Reaffirming the inalienable right to self-determination of the people of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions.
Rejecting the conduct of the G-20 Tourism Working Group Meeting, held in Srinagar on 22-24 May 2023, which aimed to legitimize India’s illegal occupation of the IIOJK and sought to project a facade of normalcy in the occupied territory.
Denouncing India’s continued refusal to allow the OIC Special Envoy, the OIC- Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC), the UN Special Mandate Holders and international civil society organizations to visit IIOJK.
Welcoming the role played by the relevant UN Special Rapporteurs, world leaders, parliamentarians, human rights organizations, and international media, in raising their voice against illegal Indian occupation and then ongoing egregious human rights violations in IIOJK.
The Joint Communique also:
Denounced the Indian authorities’ fresh plea seeking the death penalty for one of the renowned Kashmiri leaders, Yaseen Malik, who is incarcerated and has already been awarded life imprisonment; and mandated the Special Envoy on Jammu and Kashmir to take appropriate steps to raise voice against the possible award of the death penalty to Malik.
Rejected the illegal and unilateral actions taken by India on August 5, 2019, as well as subsequent steps to undermine the internationally- recognized disputed status of the IIOJK and to alter its demographic structure and political landscape.
Appreciated the countries, which decided to dissociate themselves from the G-20 Tourism Working Group Meeting in Srinagar, and,
Barrister Sultan Mehmood Choudhary, President Azad Kashmir & Mr Ghulam Mohmmad Safi, representative of All Parties Hurriyat Conference addressed the Contact Group via Zoom.
Barrister Sultan Mehmood Choudhary, President, of Azad Jammu Kashmir said that Kashmir is one of the oldest issues, pending on the agenda of the United Nations Security Council. The urgency dictates the United Nations and the OIC must come forward to support the people of Kashmir in their struggle to achieve the right to self-determination.
Mr. Safi highlighted the grave situation in Kashmir and emphasized that the Kashmir dispute needs to be resolved for the sake of international peace and security. The inaction and passivity of the world powers have given the sense of total impunity to 900,000 Indian soldiers in occupied Kashmir, Mr Safi told the group.
As America’s Influence in Asia Wanes, Asian Economies Are Integrating
Table of Contents
In the 21st century, Asia has emerged as a global powerhouse, both economically and geopolitically. The region, with its diverse cultures, languages, and histories, has seen a remarkable transformation over the past few decades. One of the most significant trends is the increasing integration of Asian economies as America’s influence in the region appears to wane. This phenomenon has wide-ranging implications for the global economy, politics, and the future of international relations.
The United States, for much of the post-World War II era, played a dominant role in shaping the political and economic landscape of Asia. The American presence was felt through alliances, trade partnerships, and military bases across the region. However, in recent years, we have witnessed a gradual shift in the balance of power. As America’s focus turned inward, and its foreign policy priorities evolved, Asia began to chart its own course. This article will delve into the factors driving the integration of Asian economies and how it is redefining the dynamics of the region.
I. The Changing Geopolitical Landscape
A. The Rise of China
One of the most significant drivers of the changing dynamics in Asia is the rise of China. With its rapid economic growth, China has become an economic juggernaut and a global superpower. Its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is reshaping the infrastructure and trade landscape across Asia, connecting China to countries throughout the region and beyond. The BRI, coupled with China’s increasing military capabilities, has significantly altered the balance of power in Asia.
China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea, its territorial disputes with neighboring countries, and its growing influence in international organizations have all raised concerns among its neighbors and global powers like the United States. The perception of a more powerful and assertive China has prompted Asian countries to rethink their alliances and seek greater economic and political autonomy.
B. U.S. Policy Shifts
The United States, for decades, played a pivotal role in ensuring stability and security in Asia. Its military alliances with countries like Japan and South Korea provided a strong deterrent against potential threats. However, recent shifts in U.S. foreign policy have raised questions about its long-term commitment to the region.
The “America First” policy of the Trump administration signaled a more transactional approach to foreign relations, leading many Asian countries to seek alternative partnerships. Furthermore, the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and its reluctance to fully engage in regional trade agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) left a void that Asian nations were eager to fill.
II. Economic Integration in Asia
A. Regional Trade Agreements
One of the most visible manifestations of Asian economic integration is the proliferation of regional trade agreements. The RCEP, signed in November 2020, is the world’s largest trade pact, covering nearly one-third of the global population and GDP. It includes countries like China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the ten member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
The RCEP is just one example of the growing trend of Asian countries coming together to promote economic cooperation. These agreements are seen as a way to reduce dependence on any single market, diversify export destinations, and promote economic growth. They also provide a platform for dialogue on non-economic issues, further deepening regional integration.
B. Supply Chain Resilience
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, prompting many Asian countries to rethink their economic strategies. The desire for supply chain resilience has led to a reevaluation of trade relationships and an emphasis on regional production networks.
Countries like Japan, for instance, have introduced policies to encourage companies to diversify their supply chains away from overreliance on China. This has opened up opportunities for greater economic integration within Asia, as countries seek to build more robust and diverse supply chains by collaborating with neighboring nations.
C. Infrastructure Investment
Infrastructure development is another key driver of Asian economic integration. China’s BRI, as mentioned earlier, is a prime example of the massive infrastructure investments taking place across the region. These projects not only promote connectivity but also foster economic interdependence.
In response to China’s BRI, Japan has launched its own infrastructure initiative, the Partnership for Quality Infrastructure (PQI). Other countries, such as India, are also investing heavily in infrastructure development to enhance regional connectivity.
III. Implications of Asian Economic Integration
A. Economic Growth and Prosperity
The integration of Asian economies has the potential to drive significant economic growth and prosperity. By increasing trade and investment flows among nations, economies can benefit from the comparative advantages of their neighbours. This can lead to increased innovation, higher productivity, and ultimately, improved living standards for millions of people in the region.
B. Geopolitical Implications
As Asian economies become more integrated, they also become more interdependent. This interdependence can act as a stabilizing force, reducing the likelihood of conflicts among nations. However, it can also create challenges if disputes arise, as economic ties can be used as leverage in diplomatic negotiations.
The changing dynamics in Asia have also led to shifts in alliances and partnerships. Some countries are hedging their bets by maintaining strong ties with both the United States and China, while others are aligning more closely with one or the other. This fluidity in alliances is a reflection of the evolving power dynamics in the region.
C. Global Trade and Investment
The integration of Asian economies has far-reaching implications for global trade and investment. As Asia becomes more economically cohesive, it strengthens its position as a global economic powerhouse. This, in turn, affects the balance of power in international institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Moreover, the rise of regional trade agreements in Asia challenges the traditional dominance of global trade agreements. The WTO, which has struggled to reach meaningful agreements in recent years, faces competition from regional pacts like the RCEP that set their own trade rules.
IV. Challenges and Considerations
A. Economic Disparities
While economic integration offers numerous benefits, it also brings to the forefront issues of economic inequality within and among countries. Not all nations in Asia are on an equal footing, and some may struggle to keep up with the pace of integration. Addressing these disparities is crucial to ensuring that the benefits of integration are shared more broadly.
B. Political Differences
Asia is not a monolithic bloc, and political differences among nations persist. Historical rivalries, territorial disputes, and differing political systems can create tensions that hinder deeper integration. Resolving these political differences will be an ongoing challenge for the region.
C. External Factors
External factors, such as the United States’ foreign policy decisions, global economic trends, and geopolitical developments, can all influence the trajectory of Asian economic integration. The region must navigate these uncertainties while pursuing its integration goals.
As America’s influence in Asia undergoes a transformation, the integration of Asian economies is gaining momentum. The rise of China shifts in U.S. foreign policy, and a growing emphasis on regional cooperation are reshaping the geopolitical and economic landscape of the continent. This integration has the potential to drive economic growth, enhance regional stability, and redefine the global balance of power.
However, the journey toward greater economic integration in Asia is not without its challenges. Economic disparities, political differences, and external factors all present obstacles that must be navigated carefully. Nevertheless, the determination of Asian nations to shape their own destiny and assert their influence on the world stage is a defining feature of the 21st century.
In today’s changing world, it is crucial to closely monitor the growth of Asia and its economic integration. The choices made by Asian nations in the upcoming years will not only impact their own futures but also have significant consequences for the global community. With the evolution of America’s role in Asia, the narrative of Asian economic integration will undoubtedly steer the direction of the 21st century.
The Birthday of the Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him): The Blessing of the World
Why Beijing’s security pact with Solomons has been a huge blunder
Opinion : How China Can Avoid the Japan Trap
What the World Should Expect from a Second Trump Term
Russia has proved resilient to Western sanctions
US-China Decoupling Could Jeopardize AI Governance: Insights from Henry Kissinger
From Gerontocracy to Youthcracy: The Dilemma of Political Parties in Pakistan
Flooding: How Hong Kong’s Visionary Flood Control Failed the Test of Climate Change
Biden Boosts Pacific Diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. Engagement in the Indo-Pacific
Democracy at Crossroads: The Impact of America’s Gerontocracy
News2 years ago
Prioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
China2 years ago
Coronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
Canada2 years ago
Socio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
Democracy2 years ago
Missing You! SPSC
Conflict2 years ago
Kashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
Democracy2 years ago
President Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
Featured2 years ago
The Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
Digital3 years ago
Pakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills