Sports
Ten ways T20 has changed since the last World Cup
The rise of specialists, super specialists, right-left pairs, six-hitting, wristspin, and more
How long has it been since we last played a T20 World Cup? Long enough for R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja to go from being persona non grata in the format to taking the place of the two wristspinners who replaced them. Long enough for the knuckleball to go from hip to raging fad to shunned to just another delivery. Here is how much the format has changed in the intervening years.
Different players for different formats
When the T20 World Cup was played last, it had been established that T20s were not an extension of ODIs. The last five years have reinforced even more strongly that this is a completely different format. And with a completely different format come specialists. It shows in how few players taking part in this World Cup also play Tests, and more starkly, ODIs.
Over 43% of players in the 2016 World Cup had played in at least half of their teams’ ODIs over the previous three years. That number has come down to one in three. One in three had played at least half their teams’ Tests and ODIs; now it is only one in four. In a three-year period before the 2016 World Cup, half the participants had played 40.6% or more of their teams’ ODIs; the corresponding number is down to 28.5% for this World Cup.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Wristspin is in
India were the only top side in the 2016 World Cup without a wristspinner. Since then they have played 69 T20Is with a result, and have used wristspin in 65. Unpredictability and variations trump accuracy on true pitches in such a short format, which makes wristspin key.
Only three wristspinners bowled 30 or more overs in the 2016 edition of the IPL. Six did in 2017, seven in 2018, nine in 2019, and eight in 2020.
In no IPL till 2017 had wristspinners bowled 2000 balls; the four IPLs between 2017 and 2020 featured 2325, 2571, 2927 and 2723 balls of wristspin. These four remain the only editions when more than 100 wickets fell to wristspin. The role of fingerspinners accordingly fell.
Still, while a wristspinner remains a must in a squad, the really good fingerspinners have begun to fight their way back, especially if they can bat or if the pitches are likely to help them or there is a strong match-up on offer. And thus India have gone from using Ashwin and Jadeja in the 2016 World Cup to neither to both again.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
All change, all the time
For decades, cricket relied on repetitions and mastery of a stock skill, but in T20, especially if you are a bowler, you need to constantly upgrade. You are a mystery bowler one year, but by the next, batters find a way to pick your variations. You have to either add subtleties to your variations or find better deception. The same goes for slower balls. One year it is the back-of-the-hand legcutter, the next, the knuckleball. This is exactly what longer formats and early T20 cricket used to look down upon. Ashwin, for example, is no longer put down for trying too many things: offbreak, carrom ball, legbreak, wrong’un, various seam positions and releases. Sunil Narine is a bowler unrecognisable from the one who started out, and though he is not in the West Indies World Cup squad, he has remained among the best because he has kept evolving and bringing in new forms of deceit.
Don’t take your foot off the pedal
This is something bowlers feel: batting sides keep going hard even if they lose wickets. Shiva Jayaraman has tried to come up with a metric here. In the first innings (chasing innings are excluded, because there the target dictates your approach) of IPL games, look at teams’ strike rates in the 18 balls after a loss of a wicket. (Leave balls in the last three overs out, because you have to keep going in that phase regardless.) There is a sharp jump in strike rates in the years 2018, 2019 and 2020.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Right + left = right
There was a series of Indian cricket adverts in the 1990s where the man on the street would spout cricket wisdom. One such: “It’s simple, rightie gaya rightie bhej; leftie gaya, leftie bhej.” If a right-hand batter gets out, send a right-hand batter in; if a left-hand batter gets out, send a left-hand batter in. T20 is now going out of its way to maintain right-left combinations. The biggest reason is not to upset the bowlers’ rhythm, but rather to deny bowlers, spinners especially, a match-up against one style of batter.
The percentage of left-right partnerships for the top five wickets* in the IPL shot up from 41.6% in 2015 to 50.7% in 2016. Since then the numbers have been 49.2, 54.3, 52.8 and 55.9.
Has it worked? Comparing just strike rates might not be the best way to judge effectiveness, but in 2019 and 2020, left-right combinations for the top five wickets scored at a quicker rate that right-right; in 2020 left-left outpaced right-left, but left-left pairs are rare, making up around 5% of top-five partnerships.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
*Note that figures in the graphic are for all wickets, not just the top five
The rise of the super specialist
Traditionally, consistency in selection has been seen as a good thing in cricket. Not anymore in T20s. In the 2020 IPL, Mumbai Indians offspinner Jayant Yadav played only two matches, one of them the final and the other against the same opponent in the league phase. There was no injury or fitness concern that brought this about. Yadav was a superspecialist. He was brought in to counter a specific side, Delhi Capitals, that was bent on utilising right-left combinations with three right-hand and three left-hand batters in its top six. The increasing use of right-left batting combinations has brought about a return of offspinners, since there aren’t many left-arm wristspinners to take the ball away from left-hand batters.
A typical ODI World Cup squad is the 1st XI plus four players who can cover as much ground as possible as replacements should there be an injury or loss of form. T20 World Cup squads are more about picking extra players who might be used in only one or two situations. Roston Chase, batting strike rate under 130, is not a typical West Indies player on flat pitches; he plays only in low-scoring matches or against a side with a few left-hand batters.
Want to win? Find the fence
It is a fact that teams that score more in boundaries win four of five T20 matches. In the second half of the last decade, the onus on hitting boundaries has increased, but more so in the middle overs, and especially six-hitting. We can see this in the IPL. Mumbai Indians were playing less-than-modern T20 when they were not winning; then they became the leaders in the middle overs.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Sixes speak louder than the rest
ODI cricket relied a lot on avoiding dot balls, but T20s are so short that the humble, hard-working single doesn’t have enough time to make an impact on the game. Fours are okay, but sixes are where it is at. In 2016, T20 champions West Indies struck sixes every 16.3 balls against the top seven teams, compared to once every 22.5 balls by other sides in the top eight in games against each other. In the last four completed IPLs, balls-per-six have stayed under 20, possibly never to cross that mark again.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Bowlers need to bat too
Mumbai Indians once won an IPL with Harbhajan Singh, Mitchell Johnson, Lasith Malinga and Pragyan Ojha and one other bowler in their bottom five. The year was 2013 and the logic was that 20 overs were not long enough to need allrounders: you could do with six batters, including a keeper and a part-time bowler, and select five specialist bowlers to take wickets.
You will not find similar team formations today. Teams want depth to allow their main batters to go all out. There is batting till No. 7 at least, followed by at least two more bowlers capable of hitting sixes. Batters who don’t hit sixes have to be as good as Jasprit Bumrah or Yuzvendra Chahal as pure bowlers to survive.
Girish TS / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
There’s still room for anchors
You would like to believe the era of two anchors getting together for a second-wicket partnership of 66 in 8.1 overs in a match that goes at near ten an over – as happened with India in the second semi-final of the last T20 World Cup – is over. To an extent it is: England, for example, will struggle to put together such partnerships because they will not play more than one anchor batter.
However, look at teams overall and there is no statistical indicator that the role of anchor batters, or even of anchor partnerships, has receded. The role of anchors in innings so short has been part of heated debates among followers, but as of now it appears teams don’t believe pure hitting ability has evolved to the point they can do away with the notion of one batter who tries to hold the innings together. This is good news for viewers: the longer teams retain this fear of losing too many wickets, the better it is for the format as a contest between bat and ball.
Courtesy : Espn/CM
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Club América’s Financial Playbook: The Economics and Valuation of Latin American Football
While most World Cup coverage focuses on stadiums and squads, the more consequential story in Mexican football has been playing out in enterprise-value deal structures. In late 2025, American investors closed a $490 million enterprise-value transaction for stakes in Club América and Mexico City’s iconic Azteca Stadium — a deal that, alongside a broader wave of U.S. capital entering Liga MX, reveals exactly how Latin American football is being financially re-architected just months before Mexico co-hosts the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
The Deal: Grupo Águilas and the $490 Million Structure
The transaction, announced in a joint statement to the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (Mexico’s stock exchange), created a new holding entity called Grupo Águilas to own both Águilas del América and the 88,000-seat Estadio Azteca (rebranded Banorte Stadium), along with adjacent land, according to City A.M.’s reporting. The ownership structure splits 51% to Ollamani Group — controlled by former media tycoon Emilio Azcárraga Jean, who becomes Grupo Águilas’ executive president — and 49% to General Atlantic, the U.S. growth equity firm.
The deal’s most distinctive feature is its data and analytics component: Grupo Águilas engaged Kraft Analytics Group, a firm controlled by the owners of the NFL’s New England Patriots, specifically to support fan engagement and data analytics for the new entity, according to City A.M. — an explicit transfer of NFL-style commercial infrastructure into Mexican football operations.
Club América/Azteca deal structure:
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Total enterprise value | $490 million |
| New holding entity | Grupo Águilas |
| Ollamani Group stake | 51% (Emilio Azcárraga Jean, executive president) |
| General Atlantic stake | 49% |
| Assets included | Águilas del América + Estadio Azteca (88,000 capacity) + adjacent land |
| Analytics partner | Kraft Analytics Group (New England Patriots ownership) |
| Club América standalone valuation | ~$770 million |
Why América Specifically: The Numbers Behind the Richest Club in Mexico
Club América’s standalone valuation of roughly $770 million, a figure that rivals mid-tier European clubs, makes it the most valuable soccer team in Mexico by a wide margin, according to reporting on the broader Liga MX investment wave. That scale advantage matters directly to the deal economics: América’s market value alone justifies a substantial share of the $490 million enterprise price even before accounting for the Azteca Stadium asset itself, one of the most recognizable sports venues in the world and a confirmed host site for the 2026 World Cup.
The Broader Pattern: American Capital’s Liga MX Land Grab
The Club América deal is the highest-profile example of a much wider trend. According to Front Office Sports, Querétaro became Liga MX’s first club with majority U.S. ownership when it was purchased by an American capital group for just over $120 million — a price point specifically attractive to investors because, as Querétaro investor Spiegel told FOS, “a lot of the leagues in Europe are more mature… you can’t expect that you will be able to increase revenue quickly by 30% to 50%,” whereas Mexican clubs remain underpriced relative to their audience scale.
Recent U.S.-linked Liga MX investment activity:
| Club | Investor Type | Deal Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Club América / Azteca Stadium | Growth equity + media (General Atlantic, Ollamani) | $490M enterprise value |
| Querétaro | American capital group | ~$120M; first majority US-owned Liga MX club |
| Necaxa | Celebrity investor group | Half-stake; modeled on Wrexham |
| Atlético San Luis | Buyout firm (via Atlético Madrid parent deal) | Acquired as part of broader Atlético Madrid transaction |
Why Liga MX, and Why Now
Three structural factors explain the timing of this capital influx. First, viewership: Liga MX is already one of the two most-watched soccer leagues in the United States alongside the English Premier League, with matches routinely drawing hundreds of thousands more viewers than MLS games and audiences that can swell into the millions for marquee fixtures, according to Front Office Sports. An Interticket study found the average Liga MX TV audience for a 2026 Clausura regular-season game reached 687,000 — comfortably ahead of NBC’s reported average Premier League audience of 510,000 in the same period, per ESPN’s reporting.
Second, the 2026 FIFA World Cup itself. Mexico is hosting 13 of the tournament’s 104 games across stadiums in Mexico City, Monterrey, and Guadalajara — the country’s first time on football’s biggest stage in 40 years — and figures within Mexican football believe the tournament will meaningfully raise the sport’s global commercial profile, according to Front Office Sports.
Third, structural governance reform. Liga MX is bound by a Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling requiring the return of promotion and relegation beginning with the 2026-27 season, according to ESPN. Sources told ESPN that outright relegation is unlikely to return in its traditional form; instead, the league is expected to expand the first division by promoting two teams from the second-tier Liga de Expansión and then permanently eliminate relegation going forward — a structure that would functionally mirror the closed, relegation-free model American investors are already familiar with from MLS, reducing downside risk for exactly the kind of capital now entering the league.
The Revenue Model Gap: Fragmented Rights, Unrealized Upside
Despite Liga MX’s viewership strength, its commercial infrastructure remains notably underdeveloped relative to its audience. TelevisaUnivision, which holds the bulk of U.S. broadcast rights, markets Liga MX as “the most-watched club soccer league in the country, regardless of language” — yet there is no single league-wide broadcast partner, with individual clubs instead negotiating separate rights deals, creating what ESPN describes as “a fragmented landscape for viewers.” Grupo Orlegi’s Alejandro Irarragorri told Front Office Sports that centralizing those rights would let Liga MX sell overseas coverage collectively rather than club-by-club — currently near-impossible outside the U.S. because no single club carries enough international fan base to interest overseas broadcasters on its own. The English Premier League’s 2022 milestone of earning more from overseas rights than domestic ones is the explicit long-term comparison being drawn.
Final Verdict
Club América’s $490 million enterprise-value transaction is best read as the clearest evidence yet that American investors view Mexican football the way private equity viewed European mid-tier clubs a decade ago: a market with Premier League-caliber viewership numbers, World Cup-driven momentum, and valuations that remain a fraction of comparable European assets. The addition of NFL-grade analytics infrastructure via Kraft Analytics Group, alongside the league’s looming governance shift toward a closed, relegation-light structure, signals that this is a bet on operational Americanization of Liga MX’s business model, not just a passive financial stake. The unresolved variable is media-rights centralization — until Liga MX clubs coordinate broadcast rights the way the Premier League does, the league’s valuation upside relative to its audience size will likely remain only partially realized, which is precisely the inefficiency the current wave of American capital appears to be betting it can help fix.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
2026 FIFA World Cup Kicks Off: USMNT Debuts as Soccer Transforms North America
MEXICO CITY and NEW YORK — The grandest experiment in modern sports history has officially begun.
With a vibrant explosion of color, sound, and historic resonance at the Estadio Azteca on Thursday, June 11, the 2026 FIFA World Cup kicked off, anchoring a month-long, continent-spanning spectacle. For the first time, three nations—the United States, Mexico, and Canada—are co-hosting an expanded 48-team tournament, transforming North America into a temporary geopolitical and commercial epicenter of the sporting world.
As the pageantry of the opening match in Mexico City gives way to the grueling reality of the group stage, attention shifts directly north. Today, the United States Men’s National Team (USMNT) makes its highly anticipated debut on home soil, igniting a wave of digital and cultural frenzy that underscores the immense financial and social stakes of this tournament.
A Continental Business Model: The Economic Scale of 2026
From a macroeconomic perspective, the 2026 tournament represents a structural shift for FIFA and its corporate partners. Operating across three distinct currencies, regulatory frameworks, and broadcasting markets, the event is projected to generate record-breaking revenues exceeding $11 billion.
Wall Street and Silicon Valley have deeply integrated into the tournament’s infrastructure. Silicon Valley tech firms have optimized broadcasting logistics, while digital engagement has already shattered previous metrics. Within hours of the opening whistle in Mexico City, the World Cup became the most talked-about event on global social media platforms, driven by a highly coordinated push from sponsors aiming at a younger, digitally native demographic.
“We are looking at an unprecedented convergence of sports, entertainment, and regional trade,” says Marissa Vance, a senior sports equity analyst at New York-based firm Vanguard Sports Group. “The 2026 tournament isn’t just a sports event; it is a live-tested economic integration of the USMCA bloc, broadcast to four billion people.”
High Stakes on Home Soil: The USMNT Takes the Pitch
For the United States, today’s opening match is more than a sporting contest—it is a critical test of a decade-long investment in soccer infrastructure and player development. Entering the tournament with a roster largely comprised of stars playing in Europe’s top-flight leagues, expectations for the American squad have never been higher.
The cultural footprint of today’s match is visible from coast to coast:
- Public Viewings: Major American metropolitan areas have converted public parks and stadiums into massive fan zones.
- Social Velocity: Tech platforms report that algorithmic traffic surrounding the USMNT has eclipsed traditional summer sports benchmarks, drawing attention from casual viewers and die-hard fans alike.
- Corporate Sponsorship: Domestic brands have invested unprecedented capital into targeted advertising campaigns, viewing this tournament as a prime opportunity to permanently capture the shifting tastes of American sports consumers.
Changing the Guard: Soccer Eclipses Hockey in Canada
While the U.S. chases competitive validation on the pitch, Canada is experiencing a profound cultural evolution off it. Long defined by the ice rink, the country’s sporting identity has quietly but fundamentally rewritten itself over the past decade.
In Canada, soccer has officially surpassed ice hockey and all other sports in youth participation.
Youth Sports Participation Trends in Canada (Ages 5-18)
======================================================
1. Soccer ███████████████████ (Highest Growth)
2. Ice Hockey ███████████████ (Stagnant/Declining)
3. Basketball ████████████ (Steady Growth)
This demographic pivot is driven by several intersecting factors:
- Accessibility and Affordability: The low barrier to entry for soccer stands in sharp contrast to the soaring costs of ice hockey equipment and rink fees.
- Urbanization and Immigration: Canada’s major urban centers—Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal—have absorbed a diverse influx of international communities where soccer is the native sporting language.
- The Hero Effect: The rise of world-class Canadian talent on both the men’s and women’s global stages has provided tangible inspiration for a new generation of players.
This shifting ground underscores the tournament’s broader cultural reach. As the matches unfold across 16 host cities over the coming weeks, the 2026 World Cup will do more than crown a global champion—it is poised to permanently alter the cultural, commercial, and athletic fabric of North America.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Opinion
The Texans Defense Just Put the AFC on Notice—With or Without Stroud
Josh Allen didn’t just lose a football game on Thursday night; he survived a mugging.
If you watched the Texans vs Bills highlights, you didn’t see a shootout. You saw a statement. You saw a Houston defensive front that smelled blood in the water and a secondary that refused to break. By the time the clock hit zero at NRG Stadium, with the scoreboard reading Texans 23, Bills 19, one thing became violently clear: The Houston Texans are no longer just “C.J. Stroud’s team.”
They are a defensive juggernaut capable of wrecking the AFC playoff picture, regardless of who is under center.
The “Bullock Breakout” and the Pass Rush Party
Let’s start with the metric that matters most: 8 sacks.
That is not a typo. The Texans’ defensive front, led by the relentless Will Anderson Jr. (who tallied 2.5 sacks and seemingly lived in the Bills’ backfield), turned one of the league’s best quarterbacks into a frantic escape artist. Anderson has now recorded a sack in six straight games, tying a franchise record held by Mario Williams. He isn’t just rushing the passer; he is wrecking game plans.
But the true story of Thursday night was rookie safety Calen Bullock.
- 3 Total Turnovers Forced: Two interceptions and a forced fumble.
- The “Closer”: His interception with 24 seconds left didn’t just pad the stats; it iced the game.
In a league obsessed with offense, DeMeco Ryans has built a unit that wins ugly. When the Bills threatened late, it wasn’t the offense that responded—it was the defense forcing a 4th-and-27 disaster for Buffalo. This is the brand of football that travels well in January.
Davis Mills Did “Just Enough” (And That’s the Point)
Let’s address the elephant in the room: C.J. Stroud was out.
When your franchise quarterback is sidelined with a concussion, the playbook usually shrinks to the size of a napkin. Enter Davis Mills. The backup signal-caller didn’t light up the box score (153 yards, 2 TDs), but he did something far more important: he didn’t lose the game.
- Zero Turnovers: Mills protected the football.
- Red Zone Efficiency: Two first-half touchdown passes gave the defense a lead they could defend.
The “Mills Narrative” isn’t about him being a saviour. It’s about the Texans proving they have the infrastructure to survive adversity. Good teams panic when their star goes down. Great teams lean on their other units. Thursday night proved that Houston is becoming the latter.
The AFC South & Playoff Picture
So, where does this leave the Texans?
At 6-5, they are back above .500 and have firmly re-inserted themselves into the NFL playoff picture AFC. This wasn’t just a win; it was a tiebreaker goldmine against a fellow AFC contender.
With the Jaguars and Colts also fighting for the AFC South crown, this win stabilises the ship. If Stroud returns healthy for the stretch run—paired with this version of the defence—Houston is a dark horse to make a deep run. They just proved they can beat a 7-win Bills team without their best player. Imagine what they can do when he returns.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When will C.J. Stroud return?
C.J. Stroud is currently in the NFL concussion protocol. While there is no official timeline, most players typically miss one week. If he clears protocol, he could return for the Week 13 matchup against the Jaguars.
Are the Texans playoff contenders?
Absolutely. At 6-5 with a tiebreaker win over Buffalo, the Texans are firmly in the Wild Card hunt and still competing for the AFC South title. Their defence (ranking top-5 in sacks) makes them a dangerous matchup for any team.
Who is Calen Bullock?
Calen Bullock is the Texans’ rookie safety out of USC. He was a third-round draft pick in 2024 and has quickly become a playmaker, recording multiple interceptions in his debut season, including the game-sealer against the Bills.
Discover more from The Monitor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Featured5 years agoThe Right-Wing Politics in United States & The Capitol Hill Mayhem
-
News5 years agoPrioritizing health & education most effective way to improve socio-economic status: President
-
China5 years agoCoronavirus Pandemic and Global Response
-
Canada5 years agoSocio-Economic Implications of Canadian Border Closure With U.S
-
Democracy5 years agoMissing You! SPSC
-
Conflict5 years agoKashmir Lockdown, UNGA & Thereafter
-
Democracy5 years agoPresident Dr Arif Alvi Confers Civil Awards on Independence Day
-
Digital6 years agoPakistan Moves Closer to Train One Million Youth with Digital Skills
